LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

5.7 rods vs 6.0 rods ?! ---

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2007 | 05:40 PM
  #1  
AlwaysCode390's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 915
From: STL
Lightbulb 5.7 rods vs 6.0 rods ?! ---

Is it actually 5.7" length vs 6.0" length rods? Why would running longer rods be better if you are using pistons that correct the extra length? Wouldnt the longer rods be heavier and weaker? Are the longer rods only better to clear STROKER cranks (the weights)? Thanks ---

ps. sorry for the newb question, but I searched and couldnt find a question exactly like mine ---
Old Feb 16, 2007 | 06:12 PM
  #2  
seawolf06's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,034
From: Raleigh, NC
http://web.camaross.com/forums/showt...ght=rod+length

http://web.camaross.com/forums/showt...ght=rod+length

Did you read those? I think it's mostly for stroker clearances, but there's a lot of theory behind it.
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 12:40 PM
  #3  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
On some cranks you need more rod length to clear the counterweights, common in BBC stuff that is internally balanced. The big deal with the weight is that the piston will be smaller in a longer rod setup, so the total mass will go down because even though the rod gains a few grams the piston loses more than the rod gains.

Bret
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 01:55 PM
  #4  
MyShibbyZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,783
Longer rods also travel further distance for the same amount of degrees, so the rod puts less side load on the up/down travel of the piston (since the distance is the same with the same crank, the longer rod travels less degrees. That puts less side load on the block wall). It's another theory that is suppose to free up all possible power.

The reason they make pistons to correct the extra .3" is so your piston does not hit your head. If your piston is already flat with the deck, and you add .3" to the stroke your piston is going to hit the head, and with a lot of force (short answer, it's bad). So if they have a piston that sits the wrist up .3" it now corrects for the extra .3" of the rod, and now the piston is still flat with the deck.
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 03:47 PM
  #5  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Ya can't tell the difference in either one.
If ya have the small weight dia size on your crank ya can use the 5.7. The compression height will be different making the 6.0 piston lighter.

Ya can't tell the difference on a dyno or in the car or longetivety.
The effect on the intake port is another book.
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 05:10 PM
  #6  
my94blackz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,064
From: Dobson, NC
Longer rod makes a hair more tq. They also say it will help the life of the engine.
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 05:46 PM
  #7  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Before everyone goes spouting data of what rod length will do, just don't as dude said there is not much of a difference.

Bret
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IndyZman
Cars For Sale
3
Oct 22, 2015 02:17 PM
karpetcm
Parts For Sale
2
Sep 29, 2015 10:08 AM
Z Power
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
Sep 19, 2015 11:19 PM
Daluchman1974
Cars For Sale
1
Sep 11, 2015 06:12 AM
plattted
West South Central
0
Sep 7, 2015 02:45 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37 PM.