396 Dyno #'s...Opinions Please

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Feb 5, 2006 | 11:22 PM

#46

Cmr0z28

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2003

Posts: 4,287

From: Palm City, Florida

Re: 396 Dyno #'s...Opinions Please

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1racerdude

Don't know about a 200 shot.Must be another engine.

The numbers I gave him were ALL MOTOR with my camshaft in it.

Sorry, not talking about your motor. He said his made 622 on a 200 shot which um....yeah nevermind.

Feb 5, 2006 | 11:26 PM

#47

firetird

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2004

Posts: 378

From: austin

Re: 396 Dyno #'s...Opinions Please

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cmr0z28

~500rwhp on a 200 shot in a 398ci...not bad I'd say!!!!!!!!

So that's like...310-315rwhp N/A?

I think he is saying his new setup will make that to the wheels on motor, without nitrous. i dont know what kind of computer he is running but i doubt he will hit that with the stock lt1 computer, the auto, and the 12 bolt but who knows.

mean94ta, what kind of intake are you running?

Feb 5, 2006 | 11:39 PM

#48

2fast97z

Registered User

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 119

Re: 396 Dyno #'s...Opinions Please

does seem a bit low...im at 399 all motor on a 357 cu. in. with mods in sig

Feb 5, 2006 | 11:56 PM

#49

1racerdude

Banned

Joined: May 2003

Posts: 6,661

From: LA (lower Alabama)

Re: 396 Dyno #'s...Opinions Please

Quote:

Originally Posted by firetird

The 505RWHP was with a stock TUNED computer,and 18% taken off the 617FWHP for the driveline.
Have gone to 556RWHP with stock computer tuned by the right person. Not going to get into a debate as to who that person is either.

2fast97z
The 380RWHP or so he originally posted is very low for the equipment that's there. It definately has problems somewhere.

Feb 6, 2006 | 12:03 AM

#50

1racerdude

Banned

Joined: May 2003

Posts: 6,661

From: LA (lower Alabama)

Re: 396 Dyno #'s...Opinions Please

Here is a real STROKER

Feb 6, 2006 | 12:14 AM

#51

Cmr0z28

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2003

Posts: 4,287

From: Palm City, Florida

Re: 396 Dyno #'s...Opinions Please

LOL, I like the ladders built into the block.

Feb 6, 2006 | 12:25 AM

#52

1racerdude

Banned

Joined: May 2003

Posts: 6,661

From: LA (lower Alabama)

Re: 396 Dyno #'s...Opinions Please

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cmr0z28

LOL, I like the ladders built into the block.

Yea that's for oil control

This thing made 5,608,312FWTQ @ 102RPM's and
108,920FWHP @ 102RPM's

Feb 6, 2006 | 12:29 AM

#53

Cmr0z28

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2003

Posts: 4,287

From: Palm City, Florida

Re: 396 Dyno #'s...Opinions Please

Pfft...childsplay

Feb 6, 2006 | 12:37 AM

#54

1racerdude

Banned

Joined: May 2003

Posts: 6,661

From: LA (lower Alabama)

Re: 396 Dyno #'s...Opinions Please

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cmr0z28

Pfft...childsplay

Hell--- all it needs is a 200 shot

They will bring a tanker truck full of NO2.
Can ya imagine the size of the turbos....

Feb 6, 2006 | 12:41 AM

#55

Deenasty

Registered User

Joined: Jan 2004

Posts: 1,322

From: San Francisco

Re: 396 Dyno #'s...Opinions Please

hey Larry you think my 12 bolt can handle that?

Feb 6, 2006 | 12:50 AM

#56

1racerdude

Banned

Joined: May 2003

Posts: 6,661

From: LA (lower Alabama)

Re: 396 Dyno #'s...Opinions Please

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deenasty

hey Larry you think my 12 bolt can handle that?

Yea if ya got good brgs and a Moser case. Damn skippy. It will have to be geared 1-1 and the tires ain't gonna hook anyway. It only turns 102RPM's and makes 5 million ft lb's of torque.

I think they need a cam change or NO2 not enough RPM's for my taste but sure like the torque.

Feb 6, 2006 | 09:12 AM

#57

93turbo5oh

Registered User

Joined: Dec 2002

Posts: 690

From: Denton, TX

Re: 396 Dyno #'s...Opinions Please

Quote:

Originally Posted by 94ZVert

Well the heads are a "full race port" by MTI in Texas before they stopped doing LT1's and focused exclusively on LS1's. They usually make some pretty good stuff and are pricey, so I hope they're not the weak point. As for flow numbers, I don't have the paperwork anymore.
I would post the dyno graph if I could but I can't post attachments and I don't have anywhere to hang it.
As for driveabilty, I really can't complain. It drives pretty well...

my buddies 396 made 435rwhp with those heads under his 396 back in 1998. is the cc306 a small base circle cam? i didnt think it was. i didnt think that would clear the rods with that much stroke?

Feb 6, 2006 | 03:21 PM

#58

amean94ta

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 1,991

From: pa

Re: 396 Dyno #'s...Opinions Please

first yeah the cc306 is a small base circle but it still sucks

second the 622 rwhp was with a 200 shot on saints camaro not my transam

larry sent me that he could put me 505 rwhp n/a with a solid roller

Feb 6, 2006 | 03:55 PM

#59

97FormulaWS-6

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2001

Posts: 2,667

From: SLC, UT

Re: 396 Dyno #'s...Opinions Please

Ok, well, I'm working on starting a 396 build myself... but after reading this thread I'm a little Concerned...

I'm planning on a VRE 396 Race Shortblock topped off with a set of AI 210 CNC TFR heads and matched cam, as well as the matched LT1 intake also done my AI. Any ideas on RWHP numbers??? I was really hoping for the 500RWHP mark, or atleast close to it.... this is on a M6/Strange 12-Bolt car...