LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

383 stroker?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 31, 2003 | 12:59 AM
  #1  
RedWS6TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 847
From: Abilene, Texas, USA
383 stroker?

i was wondering if there are special rods that have to be used in order to avoid using a small cirlce based cam. i have heard that someone makes them and was wondering if anyone is using them or know of where to get them. i am not using a complete stroker kit because i bought the crank off of a buddy of mine.
Old Dec 31, 2003 | 07:43 AM
  #2  
slopokrodrigez's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,275
Personally I have not seen a 383 that required special rods to clearance the cam. My 383 has Oliver billet rods and there is no cam clearance issues. Even Nu-tek will tell you these are some of the biggest rods you can buy but still don't have cam issues. They do however have block clearance issues which most rods in a 383 do. I had to obviously clearance the block at the oil pan rails and at the base of the cylinders. Remember to give them a minimum of .060 clearance.
Old Dec 31, 2003 | 09:19 AM
  #3  
WS Sick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,724
From: Oklahoma where trees are made of wood.
I have used both kinds of eagle rods (H and I beam) on a 383 and neither had interference problems with an over .500 lift cam.
I have seen stock rods need to have the head of the rod bolt clearanced for the bigger cams in a 383.
Old Dec 31, 2003 | 11:16 AM
  #4  
RedWS6TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 847
From: Abilene, Texas, USA
for a budget 383 could i use the stock rods without any clearance problems?
Old Dec 31, 2003 | 11:19 AM
  #5  
WS Sick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,724
From: Oklahoma where trees are made of wood.
I would definatley have it all checked. I know that over .500 lift on some of the stock rods will hit.
Old Dec 31, 2003 | 11:27 AM
  #6  
RedWS6TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 847
From: Abilene, Texas, USA
Would using 230/236 with the stock rods work even if they machine the rods for clearance.
Old Dec 31, 2003 | 11:36 AM
  #7  
WS Sick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,724
From: Oklahoma where trees are made of wood.
If they clearance the rods you will have no problems.
Old Dec 31, 2003 | 12:09 PM
  #8  
Wild1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,277
From: Orange Kounty, Kalifornia
For a fact, the Eagle 6" H-Beams will not hit... even if you go with a 396 (3.875 stroke).
Old Dec 31, 2003 | 12:18 PM
  #9  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Originally posted by RedWS6TA
Would using 230/236 with the stock rods work even if they machine the rods for clearance.
I have an XE 230/236 with Eagle H-rods.

No clearance problems at all.

I was thinking about going with a cam with more lift actually.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quickss96
Cars For Sale
6
Jan 29, 2016 05:56 PM
Z Power
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
Sep 19, 2015 11:19 PM
cristian1311
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
2
Sep 12, 2015 08:16 PM
95craz28
Fuel and Ignition
11
Sep 12, 2015 07:47 AM
alphaauto
Cars For Sale
0
Jul 26, 2015 04:40 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 AM.