LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

383 cam- what is too big?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2006, 04:30 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
96LT1TX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,035
383 cam- what is too big?

I am trying to get the most out of this new 383 w/out going above 6200-6400rpms. With that being said, here are the cams I have picked out so far, and was wondering what you guys think about them. I will get them on small base circle grinds (.95") so they will not hit my h-beams (if so im kinda screwed).

1. cmotorsports.com - Comp Cams TS233XR Camshaft 233/242 duration @ .050", .569"/.576" lift with 1.6 rockers, 114lsa.

2. thunderracing.com - Comp Cams XFI LT1 Camshaft, 242 / 248, .584 / .579 113 LSA (not sure if those lift #s are w/ or w/out 1.6s)

3. Joe O?

4. LE2?

5. ENG-290HR-12-Comp (230/244 .510/.540) 112 LSA "1800-5800 rpm. 230/244 .510/.540 @.050" 112 LSA." from speed-eng.com

anyone feel free to chime in, the heads are stock FOR NOW, later this summer to early this fall I should be getting LE2 heads. w/ stock heads CR = 11.49:1 (5.5cc 2618 wiseco pistons) and I SHOULD find out DCR but I havent yet. (I think its around 11.2:1 w/ LE2s)

Also, are EX-612 springs worthy of .600" like I was told when I bought them? I did have one break, and it very likely did cause the downfall of the stock shortblock so I do NOT want to risk this again.

thanks,

Last edited by 96LT1TX; 06-21-2006 at 04:38 PM.
96LT1TX is offline  
Old 06-21-2006, 05:25 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Mike96z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,127
Re: 383 cam- what is too big?

My 388, im using the

2. thunderracing.com - Comp Cams XFI LT1 Camshaft, 242 / 248, .584 / .579 113 LSA (not sure if those lift #s are w/ or w/out 1.6s)

Those lifts are with stock ratio rockers. I'm using 1.6rr.

You can get it from Summit $285.00 shipped. And it's great, would go wit it. The cc306 will make good power too but that other one will make more with heads.
Mike96z is offline  
Old 06-21-2006, 05:54 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
The Engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Moore Oklahoma
Posts: 1,388
Re: 383 cam- what is too big?

Originally Posted by Mike96z
My 388, im using the

2. thunderracing.com - Comp Cams XFI LT1 Camshaft, 242 / 248, .584 / .579 113 LSA (not sure if those lift #s are w/ or w/out 1.6s)

Those lifts are with stock ratio rockers. I'm using 1.6rr.
I'm building a 396 LT stroker and using the exact same Comp XFI cam, but ground on a small base circle to clear the rod bolts. The specs you listed are correct, but at the valve w/ 1.6 RRs (not 1.5s). I have the cam spec sheet. I'm expecting a power band from 2100 to 6300.

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2189634
The Engineer is offline  
Old 06-21-2006, 05:56 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
96LT1TX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,035
Re: 383 cam- what is too big?

wow, so those #s are with 1.6s? I kinda need to know which it is because I have the EX-component 612 springs, and I am told they are good to .600", but dont want to get too close to that number obviously... I am told to leave .020" clearance at least... which puts this cam at exactly .021" away from coilbind if everything is set up perfect.
96LT1TX is offline  
Old 06-21-2006, 07:36 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
97WS6SCharged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 4,784
Re: 383 cam- what is too big?

If you're going to get a set of Lloyd's heads then you may as well get the cam too. Just tell him you don't want to rev past 6200 or whatever. Just my $.02.
97WS6SCharged is offline  
Old 06-21-2006, 07:56 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: 383 cam- what is too big?

First off ditch the EX-612 springs, I think you learned that lesson already.

FWIW 3rd choice of yours is the smallest of all the cams there. For the RPM range you want to run more cam is not what you want.

I guess you could guess which choice I would pick, in the end it might be best to wait until you do the heads as well since whatever you put on that setup will be a pig without ported heads.

Bret
SStrokerAce is offline  
Old 06-21-2006, 08:23 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 3,245
Re: 383 cam- what is too big?

Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
FWIW 3rd choice of yours is the smallest of all the cams there. For the RPM range you want to run more cam is not what you want.

Bret
That looks like the cc306, won't that rev past 6200 with the LE2 heads no it?
speed_demon24 is offline  
Old 06-21-2006, 08:24 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
ABA383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Littlestown, PA
Posts: 1,903
Re: 383 cam- what is too big?

I used Joe and his head porter E.B. Porting....cam is 220ish/230ish lift just under .570 with 1.6s, heads have 2.00/1.56 valves...Shift points are 6300...Great street/strip set up that went times in my sig last year with shorties and stock wp on 16x8 wheels all around...Should be 11.20s at 120 with Kooks stepped LTs, EWP, and Bogarts....Still gets 20 mpg on the highway, too...I habe always been a huge fan of smaller cams...

--Alan
ABA383 is offline  
Old 06-21-2006, 08:29 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
96LT1TX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,035
Re: 383 cam- what is too big?

Ya, in an ideal world we have all the money in the world I know, I am about to graduate college next summer so money is very tight, it has taken me MANY months just to get this far, so I would much rather run it some as a "pig" just to beat my old bests
and then when I get tired of the performance I will just pull the heads in a weekend. I have heard smaller will give me more tq and that was my initial thoughts with the cam selection. My 350 had a xe 230/236 112 and I liked the pull at the top a LOT, but I wanted more down low.
So more tq only comes from smaller cams? Or is there some middle ground like the 224/230s? I am still learning about cams as you can see, so any input is appreciated.

p.s. my boss just got a 06 STi... thinks its fast must get the beast running

Last edited by 96LT1TX; 06-21-2006 at 08:36 PM.
96LT1TX is offline  
Old 06-21-2006, 10:09 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: 383 cam- what is too big?

Originally Posted by speed_demon24
That looks like the cc306, won't that rev past 6200 with the LE2 heads no it?
Remember this is a 383.... with stock heads it's not going to do much over about 5600rpm, but with the LE2 heads you could see HP peak in the 6200rpm range and it will hold on from there.

Bret
SStrokerAce is offline  
Old 06-21-2006, 10:51 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
tgw323's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 21
Re: 383 cam- what is too big?

.06" is more like the minimum coil bind clearance.
tgw323 is offline  
Old 06-21-2006, 10:53 PM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
96LT1TX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,035
Re: 383 cam- what is too big?

ya, it will be hard to shift at 5600rpm at the track. What type of porting is most needed? I wish someone in this town would port heads... Would make things a lot easier.

.06" hmm well what are some good valvesprings to .650"? Might as well get bigger valves too while getting heads machined for bigger springs...
96LT1TX is offline  
Old 06-21-2006, 11:17 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: 383 cam- what is too big?

Beehives are what I would run.

Bret
SStrokerAce is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bunker
Parts For Sale
2
01-30-2016 08:09 PM
smoknta
Cars For Sale
1
08-27-2015 05:07 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
08-03-2015 02:40 PM
Louey
Pacific
0
07-27-2015 09:58 PM
alphaauto
Cars For Sale
0
07-26-2015 04:40 PM



Quick Reply: 383 cam- what is too big?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 AM.