LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

355 LE Dyno tune this Friday...Guess my numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2008, 01:13 PM
  #226  
Registered User
 
ulakovic22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lantana, TX
Posts: 1,872
Originally Posted by black96z28
Thats the ones I ordered the 8501-BSBC, but Patriot has the retainers on backorder and said it would be three weeks before they could get them to me, did you find a set and where at LE let me know.......
I'm not at all familiar with Patriot springs. What are the pressures associated with those springs? What I remember being quoted earlier was close to the same closed pressure as the beehives, but a higher open pressure. Assuming the same heights were compared the patriots just have a higher spring rate?

Since there is a problem getting the Patriot springs timely along with an associated out of pocket cost why not go to Lloyd and see if he will set you up with another set of springs and get them installed correctly this time and see what happens?
ulakovic22 is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 02:04 PM
  #227  
Registered User
 
89385formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,114
Originally Posted by speed_demon24
Do you have any personal experience with this cam? Have you run it in your personal car? If not then you are just bs'in. And Lloyd setup the springs on the LE2 heads, not me. We've already been over this, I did one pull with the springs installed at 1.78" on my old heads, saw the valve float, and limited my RPM's to 5k until I supposidly fixed the problem which I obviously didn't. If my springs were bad he would have never put them on my LE2 heads. If they couldn't control the stock valves at 1.78" I don't see how they can control the heavier ferrea valves at 1.75" safley and last 30-40k miles. What qualifies you to make these kind of calls about saying what springs are good enough and what aren't? What are your credentials in valvetrain design? If you have never personaly run this cam how can you know what works and what doesn't work?
No I don't run this specific cam in my car, because I run a LS1 in my car. I have plenty of experience with these cams, and the install to make the claims. There are also other people on the boards here that run this cam and similar without issue? I am not gonna bicker with you back and forth, we already know that you can't setup springs properly and don't measure pushrod length. I am not claiming to be a valvetrain expert, I happen to be friends with a few people that set valvetrains up like this all the time and don't have issues. Not to mention I run Beehives with a cam in my car that conventional online wisdom would say won't work, and they work flawlessly. My advice was to take advice from people that have made the setup work, not people such as yourself that couldn't make it work. Any more questions for me feel free to PM me.
89385formula is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 02:13 PM
  #228  
Registered User
 
git_sum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Central, KY
Posts: 147
Originally Posted by 89385formula
I would personally stick with the PAC beehives, most likely the 1518's shimmed up.
Don't those have more spring pressure than the PAC1218's? I'm not giving you a hard way to go here but it appears that even now your saying the PAC1218s won't work and your suggesting a spring with more pressure.

To me it just seems smarter to go with the Patriots, they've been proven time and time again in ls1 cars with bigger cams and they seem to work just fine, plus they're pretty cheap given what they come with.
git_sum is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 02:17 PM
  #229  
Registered User
 
marshall93z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 2,640
Originally Posted by git_sum
Don't those have more spring pressure than the PAC1218's? I'm not giving you a hard way to go here but it appears that even now your saying the PAC1218s won't work and your suggesting a spring with more pressure.
Are you suggesting springs with LESS pressure?
marshall93z is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 02:25 PM
  #230  
Registered User
 
git_sum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Central, KY
Posts: 147
Originally Posted by marshall93z
Are you suggesting springs with LESS pressure?
No i'm suggesting to run the Patriot setup. The other guy said he'd run the PAC1518's shimmed up instead of the PAC1218's. I'm pretty sure the 1518's are the stronger springs. Not to bust his nuts or anything but now it just seems he's back peddling and even saying they should use a stronger spring than what they both have.
git_sum is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 02:28 PM
  #231  
Registered User
 
ulakovic22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lantana, TX
Posts: 1,872
Originally Posted by git_sum
Don't those have more spring pressure than the PAC1218's? I'm not giving you a hard way to go here but it appears that even now your saying the PAC1218s won't work and your suggesting a spring with more pressure.

To me it just seems smarter to go with the Patriots, they've been proven time and time again in ls1 cars with bigger cams and they seem to work just fine, plus they're pretty cheap given what they come with.
That makes no sense. He suggested going with a slightly higher spring pressure and rate so that when the springs lose the 5-10% pressure after breakin they still give more pressure than what the OP was running. Why would he want to run a spring with less pressure. To cure float you either need to reduce your valvetrain weight or get a little stronger spring to help control the valve on the way back down.
ulakovic22 is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 02:29 PM
  #232  
Registered User
 
89385formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,114
Originally Posted by git_sum
Don't those have more spring pressure than the PAC1218's? I'm not giving you a hard way to go here but it appears that even now your saying the PAC1218s won't work and your suggesting a spring with more pressure.

To me it just seems smarter to go with the Patriots, they've been proven time and time again in ls1 cars with bigger cams and they seem to work just fine, plus they're pretty cheap given what they come with.
Not backpeddling at all! PAC 1518's are a better spring. The member was worried about longevity once the issue was resolved, thats why i recomended the 1518's.
89385formula is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 02:32 PM
  #233  
Registered User
 
git_sum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Central, KY
Posts: 147
Originally Posted by ulakovic22
That makes no sense. He suggested going with a slightly higher spring pressure and rate so that when the springs lose the 5-10% pressure after breakin they still give more pressure than what the OP was running. Why would he want to run a spring with less pressure. To cure float you either need to reduce your valvetrain weight or get a little stronger spring to help control the valve on the way back down.
How does it not make sense? Before he said the 1218's were fine, now he's suggesting a spring with more pressure as if the 1218's arn't good enough.... I'm just bustin his chops is all.
git_sum is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 02:40 PM
  #234  
Registered User
 
ulakovic22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lantana, TX
Posts: 1,872
Originally Posted by wrd1972
Just pulled both beehives off of #1 cylinder. Seat pressure is 115@1.775 and 120@1.750 for the intake valve. Seat pressure is 130@1.775 and 135@1.750 for the exhaust. The springs have less than 2K miles and are junk just like blue said.
Typically the intake valve experiences float first because it weights more than your exhaust valve. Most springs will see 5-10% decrease in pressure after breakin and the fact that your exhaust valves followed this guideline while the intake didn't proves you did in fact have float.

The reason the float occured on the other hand could have been from running to low a pressure to begin with causing the spring to wear prematurely. I believe you said these spring were rated at 135 at 1.78 and they are currently 115? That's way too much and shows there was a valvetrain problem. Looking at the exhaust though shows even at 1.78 installed it still controlled the valve and didn't lose it's pressure like the intake. It only lost 5 lbs which is normal and falls in the 5-10% range.

I wouldn't count these springs out just yet and if you are able to get a set from Lloyd for free your car will be back up sooner and you will be out less money.
ulakovic22 is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 02:43 PM
  #235  
Registered User
 
ulakovic22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lantana, TX
Posts: 1,872
Originally Posted by git_sum
I'm just bustin his chops is all.
Oh ok, missed the

ulakovic22 is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 02:47 PM
  #236  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kantuckee Yo'
Posts: 4,405
Again my feelings are that the Pac 1218's are on the thresh hold, they work with some and not others depending on components used and proper set up. The only mistake I made was having them at 1.775" install height which is the way they came from LE but at that the they had Comp 918's installed. The 918's busted in 20 miles do to springs defects. I then installed the PAC 1218's that LE provided and Voila the install height was 1.775" once again. I cant say for sure if I had float or not when they were rather new.

AINT NO WAY IN HELL I AM TRYING COMP 918'S AGAIN.

I am still deciding between the Patriot Golds and the extremes. I am leaning toward the Golds hoping they would be strong enough over the 1218's to do the job without producing un-needed pressure. I dont mind monitoring them or even replacing them every few years. I talked to Patriot and they said either would be fine and far supperoir to the beehives.

I also talked to several other well respected folk that suggested the same springs.

I am also leaning toward going to 1.5 ratio roller rockers to bring the lift down to the 570's to slow the valve train down and reduce the beating.
wrd1972 is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 03:11 PM
  #237  
Registered User
 
Colin91Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 968
Originally Posted by wrd1972
I am also leaning toward going to 1.5 ratio roller rockers to bring the lift down to the 570's to slow the valve train down and reduce the beating.
If it makes you feel any better, I'm running 1.52 promags with a 3100 series lobe BRE cam (not the same lobe as you have, 2 steps bigger) and 918s.

I just took a pair of my springs off last night and had them checked today, both intake and exhaust were ~135lbs @ 1.75...I pulled all of my lifters and checked them and the cam lobes over very well....and I have no indication of any valvefloat whatsoever, even with my 7k shiftpoints....
Colin91Z is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 03:12 PM
  #238  
Registered User
 
git_sum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Central, KY
Posts: 147
1.5 rocker arms are for pussies, keep the 1.6's in there.
git_sum is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 03:14 PM
  #239  
Registered User
 
Colin91Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 968
Originally Posted by git_sum
1.5 rocker arms are for pussies, keep the 1.6's in there.
Mine still runs........
Colin91Z is offline  
Old 04-03-2008, 03:17 PM
  #240  
Registered User
 
ulakovic22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lantana, TX
Posts: 1,872
My worry is that with switching to a conventional spring that the increased pressure will be offset by the increased weight you are adding to the valvetrain system. Also switching to a 1.5 ratio probably won't do much in terms of slowing the valvetrain down as you put it. Most of the time the inertia of the valvetrain causes the spring to fully compress anyway. That's why builders pick springs that use the solid state to help control the spring. I would try the 1218's again and have them setup properly. You saw that the exhaust valves barely lost any pressure, so fatigue really shouldn't be a concern. What are the pressures on the Patriot springs?

Last edited by ulakovic22; 04-03-2008 at 03:43 PM. Reason: Grammer
ulakovic22 is offline  


Quick Reply: 355 LE Dyno tune this Friday...Guess my numbers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:58 PM.