LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

350 vs. 355 vs. 383 build price

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-31-2007, 04:40 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Camarocracy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 992
350 vs. 355 vs. 383 build price

Let's say that I wanted to rebuild my motor for boost. What did you guys pay to have your motor rebuilt at the stock 350ci, 355ci and a 383 stroker?

And do you still have the stock rear end and transmission?
Camarocracy is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 05:03 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
joe-96z1le's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 440
The numbers on this will be all over the place. Depends on the quality of parts you want to use and whether or not you'll be doing the labor or you'll be paying someone to do it. And some of that cost will depend on how much boost you'll want to run. What I would consider a good, balanced rotating assembly (Lunati, Callies, Diamond pistons) is costing at least $3k. Head work $2k+. A decent s/c kit alone is about $4k. And the supportting mods can add up pretty quick. I have a Strange unit so add about $2400 for that. Clutch, another $500+. Driveshaft $300. The T56 should hold up to 600HP+. And don't forget the dyno tuning.

But, if your going to replace the rotating assembly, a 383 is the way to go. Get the extra CI since your replacing the crank anyway. If you know the boost and HP you want contact someone like VRE and get a complete shortblock price.

Last edited by joe-96z1le; 03-31-2007 at 05:07 PM.
joe-96z1le is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 05:54 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
reamo04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,706
talked to my local machine shop, the only price difference for machining is
$45 for clearancing the block
$25 for clearancing the rods

so, another $70 for a 383 over a 355, assuming all your parts cost the same
reamo04 is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 06:15 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
seawolf06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,034
Originally Posted by reamo04
talked to my local machine shop, the only price difference for machining is
$45 for clearancing the block
$25 for clearancing the rods

so, another $70 for a 383 over a 355, assuming all your parts cost the same
If you're going to be building for boost, then you're going to need all new middle to top of the line rotating assembly, so the price difference isn't going to be that great from 355-383. Most people stay with the stock crank, which is why a 355 is cheaper for other people.
seawolf06 is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 06:22 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
joe-96z1le's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 440
Oh yea. Tack on another $1k for supporting fuel system mods.
joe-96z1le is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 08:29 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
DarthIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Teeter-tottering between Brilliance and Insanity
Posts: 1,292
If your doing a rebuild, your probbaly going to be at 355 even if you dont stroke. Its always a good idea to take it to .030 over just so your working with new metal as oppossed to just a bore hone.
DarthIROC is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 10:54 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
turnin20s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 597
Not to jack the thread, but I'm doing a 355 with a stock crank and rods but with new pistons what will the stock pieces hold up to? I'm planning on some ARP rod bolts and main studs for some more insurance.
turnin20s is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 11:10 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Critter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: fort worth/burleson Tx
Posts: 1,513
355 is the best bet... most of the time the 355 comes out being a better lt1 that 383 lt1's i have read about on the forums.
Critter is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 11:25 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Originally Posted by Critter
355 is the best bet... most of the time the 355 comes out being a better lt1 that 383 lt1's i have read about on the forums.
Probably has more to do with too many people thinking cubes are power and neglecting the topend.

If you need to buy a crank I would do a stroker, if you are OK with reusing the crank then a 355 can make good power.
The stock pistons are pretty heavy yet the whole stock rotating assembly is fairly reliable. Many aftermarket pistons are lighter even forged which only serves to reduce load on the rods and crank effectively making them safe at higher speeds yet.

Comes down to budget and goals.

Far as the transmission, if you have the 4L60E it gets a bad rap but that is because of bad builders, there are a number of shops out there that can build them very well just there are even more than can't.

The 7.5" axle is weak but it usually takes either dragstrip launches on sticky tires or wheelhop to break it. An automatic tranny does not shock it as hard as a manual so they can last behind an auto at least to a point.
96capricemgr is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 11:45 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
DarthIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Teeter-tottering between Brilliance and Insanity
Posts: 1,292
Originally Posted by Critter
355 is the best bet... most of the time the 355 comes out being a better lt1 that 383 lt1's i have read about on the forums.
I dont really agree with that, i think why you notice more problems with 383s is the fact that there are more hardcore builds with 383s than 355s. Most of the time a 355 is a near stock rebuild. And of course with a more radical set-up comes more bugs.

Stroking a motor has its issues but they are minimal to be honest. Going to a longer rod with the longer stroke helps some. IMO theres no real reason not to take the extra 30 ci
DarthIROC is offline  
Old 04-01-2007, 12:19 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Critter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: fort worth/burleson Tx
Posts: 1,513
Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Probably has more to do with too many people thinking cubes are power and neglecting the topend.

If you need to buy a crank I would do a stroker, if you are OK with reusing the crank then a 355 can make good power.
The stock pistons are pretty heavy yet the whole stock rotating assembly is fairly reliable. Many aftermarket pistons are lighter even forged which only serves to reduce load on the rods and crank effectively making them safe at higher speeds yet.

Comes down to budget and goals.

Far as the transmission, if you have the 4L60E it gets a bad rap but that is because of bad builders, there are a number of shops out there that can build them very well just there are even more than can't.

The 7.5" axle is weak but it usually takes either dragstrip launches on sticky tires or wheelhop to break it. An automatic tranny does not shock it as hard as a manual so they can last behind an auto at least to a point.
like you said it has a lot to do with neglecting the heads!
Critter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
10-31-2016 11:09 AM
cheapchevy
LT1 Based Engine Tech
11
04-08-2015 08:48 PM
transam_388
LT1 Based Engine Tech
9
03-15-2015 11:53 AM
Jrlt1
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
01-03-2015 07:38 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
12-28-2014 06:20 PM



Quick Reply: 350 vs. 355 vs. 383 build price



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 AM.