3.73s or 4.10s with T56???
Not a bad E/T with a 2.3 60foot. I got a 13.4@101 with a 1.85 60 foot with the 2.97 tranny. Not I can hardly launch the thing cause it boggs its self to death. I have to launch at 3500-4000 and slip the hizzle out of it. Thats what killed my CF/DF clutch. SPEC stage 3 is on the way!!! And some 4.10s im thinking.
Originally posted by robb4964
Why would you nurse it down the track , after the launch , your not going to break that rear end .
Why would you nurse it down the track , after the launch , your not going to break that rear end .
Shifts take a toll on the rear end as well. The shock loading kills these things. At first it simply opens up the tolerances, which increases the shock loads, and on the vicious cycle goes. I've seen rear ends that weren't grenaded at the track but on the street, and not on hard launch either.I could care less about my ET. My first trip to the strip was over the summer and, while fun, isn't really what I'm saving my pennies for

I'd rather get my big brake kit installed than spend money on a 60' time
Personally, I wouldn't go higher than 3.73's. I do a lot of interstate driving and 4.10's would put me at too high of an RPM between 70 and 80 MPH in 6th.
3.73's are still ok at those speeds.
To see that max benefit of new rear gears you also need to increase your redline. You will probably do this anyways with the CC306 and RR's. If you don't increase your redline past 5700 rpm, the new rear gears will not help any after 1st gear because the max speed of each gear is less so the new torque in each gear is affective for a shorter speed range. They will still help a lot in 1st gear, but if you already have traction problems in 1st, gears may be a pain.
Dan
3.73's are still ok at those speeds.
To see that max benefit of new rear gears you also need to increase your redline. You will probably do this anyways with the CC306 and RR's. If you don't increase your redline past 5700 rpm, the new rear gears will not help any after 1st gear because the max speed of each gear is less so the new torque in each gear is affective for a shorter speed range. They will still help a lot in 1st gear, but if you already have traction problems in 1st, gears may be a pain.
Dan
Originally posted by Buttercup
Well, not the entire track but where it matters
Shifts take a toll on the rear end as well. The shock loading kills these things. At first it simply opens up the tolerances, which increases the shock loads, and on the vicious cycle goes. I've seen rear ends that weren't grenaded at the track but on the street, and not on hard launch either.
I could care less about my ET. My first trip to the strip was over the summer and, while fun, isn't really what I'm saving my pennies for
I'd rather get my big brake kit installed than spend money on a 60' time
Well, not the entire track but where it matters
Shifts take a toll on the rear end as well. The shock loading kills these things. At first it simply opens up the tolerances, which increases the shock loads, and on the vicious cycle goes. I've seen rear ends that weren't grenaded at the track but on the street, and not on hard launch either.I could care less about my ET. My first trip to the strip was over the summer and, while fun, isn't really what I'm saving my pennies for

I'd rather get my big brake kit installed than spend money on a 60' time
Yeah, I have a buddy with an auto 94Z that is running 12.4 and pulling 1.7 60 foots on an Auburn diff and 3.73s and his rear is holding together fine on a set of 17 inch drag radials.
Originally posted by Sleeper_Z
Yeah, I have a buddy with an auto 94Z that is running 12.4 and pulling 1.7 60 foots on an Auburn diff and 3.73s and his rear is holding together fine on a set of 17 inch drag radials.
Yeah, I have a buddy with an auto 94Z that is running 12.4 and pulling 1.7 60 foots on an Auburn diff and 3.73s and his rear is holding together fine on a set of 17 inch drag radials.
Load the bitch up and let her fly off the line if you've got an A4
Originally posted by Sleeper_Z
yeah but hes not easy on this one. Flashing a 3600 Vig converter isnt easy by any means on a rear.
yeah but hes not easy on this one. Flashing a 3600 Vig converter isnt easy by any means on a rear.
No no Im not disagreeing here, I was just adding my 2 cents. I deminatly agree that an M6 is alot harder on a rear than an A4. Just my nature to compare apples to orages sometimes. No disrespect intended.
Originally posted by Mystic97Z
maybe a dumb question, what is the difference between m6 and t56?
my buddy had a 96 6 speed formula, went from 3:42's to 4:10's. he said it was about a 500 rpm difference..
maybe a dumb question, what is the difference between m6 and t56?
my buddy had a 96 6 speed formula, went from 3:42's to 4:10's. he said it was about a 500 rpm difference..
I've got 3.73's in my M6 and I love em, I felt a little difference over the 3.42's and I like being able to use 6th gear more.. I dont go to the track often and I'm on the highway alot with city driving also. thats why I chose against 4.10's....
Yup M6 and T56 are the same, you will see that alot on here along with A4 which means Automatic 4-speed and M6 just means Manual 6-speed. Thanks for all the info and trap speeds. I think my mind is made up and Im gonna go for the 4.10s. Thanks again guys for all your help.
Jeremy
Jeremy



None taken, bud