LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

3:42's better over stock 3:23's in A4?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 05:53 PM
  #1  
Eddie Z-28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 449
From: Wilkes-Barre PA
3:42's better over stock 3:23's in A4?

I was thinking about changing my 3:23's over to 3:42s in order to maybe make some extra horsepower or lose some time off my ET. Would it help with a mainly stock car, or am I beter off spending my money elsewhere?
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 06:02 PM
  #2  
95_LT1_6SPD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,093
From: Caledon Ontario Canada
gears wont make more hp, it will just seem that way, personally i would go 3.73 instead of 3.42 get off the line faster, and still cruise at a decent rpm
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 06:09 PM
  #3  
HM Murdock's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 465
From: The Great State of Texas.
It'll only cost you ~300rpm to get 3.73's but it will give you more benefit at the track. I have had both, 3.42's and an LS1, and 3.73's and an LT1, and I like both, but I could feel more of a difference with 3.73's, it just picks up faster.
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 06:56 PM
  #4  
Got-LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 811
From: tallahassee, FL
3.73s were one of my early mods, the car gets off the line so much better.
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 07:53 PM
  #5  
Hotwire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 719
From: Summerfield, NC USA
you wouldn't really notice a difference going from 3.23s to 3.42s, it will feel like a waste of time and money after you are done. I did the same thing and wasn't happy w/ the results.
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 07:55 PM
  #6  
S8ER95Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 609
From: Quad Cities
If your not worried about your top speed at all.. go with the 3:73s I have 3:42s and they are great... I think 3:73s would be tricky to launch on the street..and bad in the snow (I drive year round). Not to mention I can still hit 165+ with no issues and still have RPM left. Just depends on if your a track junky or not. Since most of my races end up on the interstate..Ive considered downgrading back to 3:23s and focusing on getting the HP numbers up.

Basically.. You want to see a difference in ET and visit the track regularly..get the 3:73s... that doesnt fit your bill?? Spend the money elsewhere and leave the 3:23s in there.
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 08:02 PM
  #7  
zoso1959's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 187
From: ill
Thumbs up good point

Originally posted by S8ER95Z
If your not worried about your top speed at all.. go with the 3:73s I have 3:42s and they are great... I think 3:73s would be tricky to launch on the street..and bad in the snow (I drive year round). Not to mention I can still hit 165+ with no issues and still have RPM left. Just depends on if your a track junky or not. Since most of my races end up on the interstate..Ive considered downgrading back to 3:23s and focusing on getting the HP numbers up.

Basically.. You want to see a difference in ET and visit the track regularly..get the 3:73s... that doesnt fit your bill?? Spend the money elsewhere and leave the 3:23s in there.


***************************
I plan on replacing my stock 2.73 with a set of strange 3.42.................
After I had did some looking around, I found that thunder racing offered the best package, i have a 2.73 gear in my car now and this weekend, i'll be putting in a strange 3.42.
I went with the complete kit, I don't think you need the delux kit, unless your rear end is in bad shape.
the complete kit comes with the gear, pinion, t/a cover with fill &
drain plugs,bearings,shims,sleeves.all the fluids
and at the price of 399.00 I think its a good buy.

The team that did "one lap America" in a '95 TA, tested the gears 2.73 till 4.10 and they concluded that 3.42's gave the best overall performance.

I had talked to tech rep at thunder racing and they had told me that staying with the 2 series carrier is fine, your not giving anything on quality or strength from the gear.
you just don't have as many options to choose from with other
gear sizes.

I also don't plan on getting radical with my engine, I'm happy with what she puts out, just wnated a little more zip off the line.
hope all this helps...................................
zoso

Last edited by zoso1959; Oct 29, 2003 at 08:04 PM.
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 08:54 PM
  #8  
pu12en12g's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,007
From: USA
For what it's worth, I went from 2.73 to 3.73, and the difference is minimal.


So IMO, there would be hardly any difference from 3.23 to 3.42
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 09:01 PM
  #9  
Hotwire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 719
From: Summerfield, NC USA
Originally posted by pu12en12g
For what it's worth, I went from 2.73 to 3.73, and the difference is minimal.


So IMO, there would be hardly any difference from 3.23 to 3.42
man, I don't mean to step on toes, but you saying going from 2.73s to 3.73s showed a minimal difference would lead me to believe you are smoking crack.

unless you changed tire size to 33.50 x 10.50 at the same time as the gear change, you had to have noticed a difference!!! It blows my mind to think you couldn't really tell a difference.

If you had someone else do the gear change, I would check to make sure they installed the right gear!!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
canbaufo
Parts For Sale
7
May 25, 2015 12:01 PM
MyShibbyZ28
Parts For Sale
0
Feb 14, 2015 12:05 PM
siguy
Parts For Sale
3
Nov 27, 2014 10:07 AM
Z28Wilson
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
7
Aug 1, 2002 04:27 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 PM.