LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Which 230/236 cam for a 383?

Old Apr 30, 2003 | 12:18 PM
  #1  
R_Andersen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 190
From: Long Island, NY
Which 230/236 cam for a 383?

I plan on ordering all the internal parts for a 383 LT1 buildup in the next week or so and i would like to go with one of the cam kits from Cmotorports. I have decided on the 230/236 cam since I am going to have to deal with emissions and I feel that with the right tuning I can get this cam to pass. My question is which version of the cam would be best for my setup? I will be running approx 11.5:1 compression on well ported LT1 heads with an M6. Cmotorsports lists the following cams:

NCC-230HL 230/236 duration @ .050", .560"/.570" lift with 1.5 rockers, .598"/.608" lift with 1.6 rockers.

NCC-230XH 230/236 duration @ .050", .584"/.585" lift with 1.5 rockers, .622"/.624" lift with 1.6 rockers.

NCC-230XL 230/236 duration @ .050", .510"/.521" lift with 1.5 rockers, .544"/.555" lift with 1.6 rockers.

The 230XH has the least amount of overlap at 59 degrees so it would seem like the best for emissions, but it also has the highest lift and extreme ramps. I also like the look of the 230HL as far as lift goes with 1.6RR's but it has 64 degrees of overlap and might be harder to pass emission with.

Any advice on cam choice for this setup would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Rob A.
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 01:30 PM
  #2  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Thats a lot of lift.
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 01:45 PM
  #3  
kmook's Avatar
Advanced Tech Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,262
From: Nashville
Id go with the NCC-230XH IMO. Just make sure you have ok PTVC when you get one of these.
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 01:51 PM
  #4  
R_Andersen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 190
From: Long Island, NY
Originally posted by kmook
Id go with the NCC-230XH IMO. Just make sure you have ok PTVC when you get one of these.

Would you recomend this cam with 1.5 or 1.6 ratio rockers? The lift numbers start to get realy big at 1.6. Also, at what lift will I start to run into piston clearance issues with stock LT1 heads and flat top pistons?

Thanks Again,
Rob
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 01:58 PM
  #5  
kmook's Avatar
Advanced Tech Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,262
From: Nashville
Hmm, well Seth at CM would have more knowledge on what you could probably get away with on that combo and still have ok clearance. I dont want to make any guesses and have you commin after me ...
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 02:12 PM
  #6  
94Sleeper's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 196
From: Tucson, Az
I installed the Comp XE 230/236 cam with the same lobes as the XL cam that CMS is selling. The HL and XH lobes have very fast/steep ramps. The steep ramps are a little rough on hydraulic lifters and may shorten their life. If you choose the HL or XH cam you should seriously consider the Comp R Lifters as well.
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 03:38 PM
  #7  
ChuckZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 152
From: Cincinnati,Ohio,U.S.
Yeah be careful with the piston to valve clearance. On my cam I had exactly .060 left which isnt much to play with. I have this on stock pistons.
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 03:42 PM
  #8  
R_Andersen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 190
From: Long Island, NY
Originally posted by ChuckZ28
Yeah be careful with the piston to valve clearance. On my cam I had exactly .060 left which isnt much to play with. I have this on stock pistons.
What lift lobes was that with and what ratio rockers were you using? Thanks...
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 04:58 PM
  #9  
notfastenuf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 39
From: Ft Walton Beach Florida
hey man I am going with the .598 .608 cam in my 12-1 com. 355
the motor isnt together yet but seth atCMS said that I should have plenty of room so I hope that helps you alittle
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 11:30 PM
  #10  
ChuckZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 152
From: Cincinnati,Ohio,U.S.
.3800 intake and .3830 exhaust on 1.6rrs. If you want I can scan my cam card and email it to you. Just let me know. At least I was told it was at .060 when It was put in and its still only on the 350 motor

Last edited by ChuckZ28; Apr 30, 2003 at 11:34 PM.
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 11:59 PM
  #11  
WS6T3RROR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,517
From: Engineerland
probably wont be able to pass emissions with any of those but feel free to try. if it were me i'd take the NCC-230HL little easier on HR lifters. ported stock heads wont utilize the lift gained over 600 anyhow for the most part its just harder on springs and other things like that. just mho. any of those should make good power though good luck
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
drptop70ss
Forced Induction
1
Mar 26, 2015 01:50 AM
transam_388
LT1 Based Engine Tech
9
Mar 15, 2015 11:53 AM
Queens94z28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
5
Nov 20, 2014 06:03 PM
slocody
LT1 Based Engine Tech
7
Feb 10, 2003 01:04 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 AM.