LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

14 mpg. What is wrong?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 03:29 PM
  #16  
Red96Lt1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,253
From: Birmingham, Al
Tell us what worked for you.
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 02:26 AM
  #17  
MikeGyver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,497
From: Orem, UT
You can easily test o2 sensors.

1)Remove from car.
2)Put 12 volts to the heater (2 same colored wires) and it will heat up in a couple minutes, if not replace
3)find the pin with continuity to the case. Attach volt meter ground to this pin or case.
4)the remaining wire is the 0-1v sensor output

5)in air, the sensor will read zero or slightly negative voltage. Using a butane lighter, displace the atmosphere inside the cage with fuel (no flame) and the voltage should rise to over 500mV, if not replace.


Sensor should have immediate reaction time. With butane in the cage, you will need to blow into it to remove the butane too see a quick voltage fall time.

I've tested several like this recently and Ive noticed the ones that have failed see a decrease in voltage (go negative) when oxygen is displaced (opposite of a good sensor).

Last edited by MikeGyver; Feb 6, 2009 at 02:35 AM.
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 08:43 AM
  #18  
97LT4SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 29
From: Seymour, CT
Never put two and two together. My driver's side JBA shorty has been leaking from #3 since they were installed in 2003 but never thought an exhaust leak at the header flange would lead to bad gas mileage. I put no more than 500 miles max on the car over the summer so I just figured I had a heavy foot. This thread explains why I only get 10 mpg at best.

Can the exhaust leak lead to future problems or just bad gas mileage, O2 sensors are original? Motor runs great and consistently puts down 360 rwhp.

For those that remember my MAF Pink wire hasn't been an issue since replacing the Pigtail last summer
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 09:04 AM
  #19  
The_Bishop's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 316
From: Purgatory... Also known as New Jersey.
You should be getting better than 20 MPG on the highway. Hell, I get that from my car at 70 and I'm running 4.10 gears in an A4!
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 09:06 AM
  #20  
Red96Lt1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,253
From: Birmingham, Al
I get about 24 when i drive 80
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 09:14 AM
  #21  
97LT4SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 29
From: Seymour, CT
The shop which performed my mods 2 years ago also told me that the stock fuel pump was starving the engine while on the dyno. They suggested a new Walpro, which would of course require dropping the rear & exhaust so I haven't done anything, no $ at the time. Maybe this summer I'll have them do the swap. I'd do it myself but no lift in my garage.

Could an overworked fuel pump also cause bad mpg?
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 12:21 PM
  #22  
Kevin Blown 95 TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,684
Originally Posted by 97LT4SS
The shop which performed my mods 2 years ago also told me that the stock fuel pump was starving the engine while on the dyno. They suggested a new Walpro, which would of course require dropping the rear & exhaust so I haven't done anything, no $ at the time. Maybe this summer I'll have them do the swap. I'd do it myself but no lift in my garage.

Could an overworked fuel pump also cause bad mpg?
I doubt it. I would think you would be starving for fuel at some point if your pump was going south. That doesnt' have the same effect as a header leak.
Old Feb 7, 2009 | 02:40 AM
  #23  
MikeGyver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,497
From: Orem, UT
Originally Posted by 97LT4SS
They suggested a new Walpro, which would of course require dropping the rear & exhaust...
Cutting a hole in the trunk to access the fuel pump is such a better way of going about this... I can pull my pump in 5 minutes.
Old Feb 7, 2009 | 11:15 AM
  #24  
97LT4SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 29
From: Seymour, CT
Yes, I know but SLP only made 106 LT4's in '97 so I'd hate to cut sheetmetal. Thanks for the suggestion.
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 07:19 AM
  #25  
redneckgames's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 325
From: Lincolnton, NC
lol, well I averaged 20 mpg two tanks in a row, then the next it went back to 14, then yesterday at 15.

next weekend I plan on fixing or atleast locating the exhaust leak, somewhere on passenger side. Im going to also try seafoaming it and check the 02 sensors.
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 03:34 PM
  #26  
MikeGyver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,497
From: Orem, UT
I'd test the 02's first. If one fails it will default to open loop and noticably increase fuel consumption.

or maybe someone was joyriding it
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Aaront810
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
13
Aug 29, 2020 09:34 PM
9t4lt4z28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
1
Oct 2, 2015 10:28 AM
fift5
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
11
Oct 1, 2015 10:31 AM
95craz28
Fuel and Ignition
11
Sep 12, 2015 07:47 AM
Aaront810
LT1 Based Engine Tech
1
Sep 11, 2015 11:24 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 AM.