LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

11.8:1 Compression?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 12:14 AM
  #16  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Re: 11.8:1 Compression?

Originally Posted by 94zgreenmachine
This was more Lloyd than Bret. I had some troubles when it came to doing my 4 bolt conversion. A cap was NOT seated in the register complete and it was out of whack. I had to have it align bored (again ) and they decked the block (again ). My piston ended up being .010 in the hole and using the fel pro 5716 .026 we came up with .036 quench. Lloyd said between .035 and .045 would be good but no tighter. Bret was sorta forced to work with it. That would explain the "different" cam specs. I still think its weird but don't dwell much on it cause it pulls like a **** and thats all that counts.


I have run .030 on the street,but don't recommend it for the novice builder 'cause most don't have the tool's to check it with or take the time to do it. The fun stops when it sounds like the valves need adj or an exhaust leak, but valve adj don't fix it and no leak.
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 10:25 AM
  #17  
94zgreenmachine's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,309
From: Oshkosh, Wisconsin
Re: 11.8:1 Compression?

Originally Posted by 1racerdude
I have run .030 on the street,but don't recommend it for the novice builder 'cause most don't have the tool's to check it with or take the time to do it. The fun stops when it sounds like the valves need adj or an exhaust leak, but valve adj don't fix it and no leak.
I pretty much had to order my engine builder to do it. He kept telling me I would need race fuel. He really wanted to port my heads and I wouldn't let him. He kept trying to sell me some top pro line heads. I had to tell him over and over that unless they are reverse cool, forget it. I had to stay on him to just do what Lloyd was asking for.His mentality is the old big block knuckle dragger type. I'd be scared as hell to bring him an LS1
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 10:34 AM
  #18  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Re: 11.8:1 Compression?

Originally Posted by 94zgreenmachine
I pretty much had to order my engine builder to do it. He kept telling me I would need race fuel. He really wanted to port my heads and I wouldn't let him. He kept trying to sell me some top pro line heads. I had to tell him over and over that unless they are reverse cool, forget it. I had to stay on him to just do what Lloyd was asking for.His mentality is the old big block knuckle dragger type. I'd be scared as hell to bring him an LS1

Yea,I hear ya. Some of the shops do what has prove reliable for THEM and don't want to walk on the wild side 'cause of making a mistake and having to warranty their mistake.
Luckily I have a machine shop that is owned by an old fart(like me) and has the knowledge it takes to keep up with the latest. He also builds some FINE engines and we understand each other.
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 11:48 AM
  #19  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Re: 11.8:1 Compression?

Originally Posted by ChrisUlrich
How much timing was pulled to make it work? How much pinging/knocking did you have or do you have...?

My friend is insisting that I can't run 11.8:1 compression on pump gas without pulling a serious amount of timing and losing a serious amount from the high compression motor.

Also insists that nitrous on pump gas is a complete no no
No timing was pulled. Your friend is thinking about old school SBCs. The LT1 is reverse cooled and can take a lot of compression.

Higher compression is more efficient.

You have to pull timing for nitrous if you run the same pump gas. I think its 2 degrees for every 50 shot.
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 12:55 PM
  #20  
Sergio's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 224
From: Holland
Re: 11.8:1 Compression?

Racerdude sure knows his stuff !
Thanks for your effortless help and helping some of us newbies out ....
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 01:02 PM
  #21  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Re: 11.8:1 Compression?

Originally Posted by Sergio
Racerdude sure knows his stuff !
Thanks for your effortless help and helping some of us newbies out ....

Anytime

THANKS

Last edited by 1racerdude; Jul 10, 2005 at 01:06 PM.
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 02:04 PM
  #22  
swemdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 237
From: Western MI
Re: 11.8:1 Compression?

94zgreenmachine- what is your dynamic compression ratio if I may ask?
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 08:03 PM
  #23  
94zgreenmachine's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,309
From: Oshkosh, Wisconsin
Re: 11.8:1 Compression?

Originally Posted by swemdog
94zgreenmachine- what is your dynamic compression ratio if I may ask?
9:1 . It is the safest to run on pump gas. I am sure it could be stretched a bit but a good tune is also very important.
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 08:06 PM
  #24  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Re: 11.8:1 Compression?

Originally Posted by 94zgreenmachine
9:1 . It is the safest to run on pump gas. I am sure it could be stretched a bit but a good tune is also very important.

Good cooling also.
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 08:15 PM
  #25  
94zgreenmachine's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,309
From: Oshkosh, Wisconsin
Re: 11.8:1 Compression?

Originally Posted by 1racerdude
Good cooling also.
yup. The car runs a tad bit hotter now than it did when stock but it still never gets above 180*. I suppose when you double the HP of the car thats to be expected!
Old Jul 15, 2005 | 03:11 PM
  #26  
93ZM6Tally's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 870
From: Tallahassee, FL
Re: 11.8:1 Compression?

Originally Posted by 94zgreenmachine
.....My piston ended up being .010 in the hole and using the fel pro 5716 .026 we came up with .036 quench.

Are you maybe meaning a Mr. Gasket 5716. Only reason I ask because I'm looking at different head gasket options and I so far haven't found a FelPro 5716.

Thx.
Old Jul 15, 2005 | 06:42 PM
  #27  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Re: 11.8:1 Compression?

Originally Posted by 93ZM6Tally
Are you maybe meaning a Mr. Gasket 5716. Only reason I ask because I'm looking at different head gasket options and I so far haven't found a FelPro 5716.

Thx.
Chris,
If ya go with tight quench and it runs good,don't tell everybody that ya did the tight quench.Let um find out on their own.It took several years of trial and error for me to catch a clue. For board members .
.036 is fine if ya got GOOD quality steel rod's.I would rather see the combustion chamber in the head v part of it in the block with the piston being in .010 in the block,but I'm picky.
Old Jul 15, 2005 | 09:58 PM
  #28  
94zgreenmachine's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,309
From: Oshkosh, Wisconsin
Re: 11.8:1 Compression?

Originally Posted by 93ZM6Tally
Are you maybe meaning a Mr. Gasket 5716. Only reason I ask because I'm looking at different head gasket options and I so far haven't found a FelPro 5716.

Thx.
sorry, I didn't even catch that. Your right, I meant Mr. Gasket.
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 09:56 AM
  #29  
Mindgame's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,985
From: In a house by the bay
Re: 11.8:1 Compression?

Originally Posted by 1racerdude
I have run .030 on the street,but don't recommend it for the novice builder 'cause most don't have the tool's to check it with or take the time to do it. The fun stops when it sounds like the valves need adj or an exhaust leak, but valve adj don't fix it and no leak.
You talking about a mag base and dial indicator, deck-to-piston-@-TDC, measurement 'dude?

Yeah, I do that too. Even check it on all eight cylinders.

My problem with the "tight is right" arguement is this.... you can't calculate the dynamic clearance easily. Take into account some of the variables we'll need to do that and ask some questions....

How much does the rod stretch at peak rpm or at off-throttle?
How much does the crank flex?
How much does the piston expand (perpendicular to the pin bore)?
Piston rock?

Too many variables for a static check to be the end-all that determines where the piston and head won't touch.

And I'm sure many of you remember this discussion from Advanced Tech. Circle Track magazine did a test a number of years ago showing the effect of tighter quench and found a point of very diminishing returns. .025 vs .035-.040 power differences were less than a % in a 600 hp asphalt race motor.

Just my 2 cents.

-Mindgame
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 10:27 AM
  #30  
93ZM6Tally's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 870
From: Tallahassee, FL
Re: 11.8:1 Compression?

Originally Posted by Mindgame
You talking about a mag base and dial indicator, deck-to-piston-@-TDC, measurement 'dude?

Yeah, I do that too. Even check it on all eight cylinders.

My problem with the "tight is right" arguement is this.... you can't calculate the dynamic clearance easily. Take into account some of the variables we'll need to do that and ask some questions....

How much does the rod stretch at peak rpm or at off-throttle?
How much does the crank flex?
How much does the piston expand (perpendicular to the pin bore)?
Piston rock?

Too many variables for a static check to be the end-all that determines where the piston and head won't touch.

And I'm sure many of you remember this discussion from Advanced Tech. Circle Track magazine did a test a number of years ago showing the effect of tighter quench and found a point of very diminishing returns. .025 vs .035-.040 power differences were less than a % in a 600 hp asphalt race motor.

Just my 2 cents.

-Mindgame
Not to hijack, but Mindgame I'd be interested in your opinion on the below. Because I'm not too smart I've got a block that's been o-ringed, (long story), at any rate my current setup has my piston's .016 in the hole, giving me a .056 quench with my current Flatout Gasket. I probably can go to a .031 gasket that would put me at about .046 quench. They sell a .021 which would put me right where I want to be but they wouldn't recommend that because the wire could cut through the gasket. Do you think I should live with the .056 or maybe the .046 rather than scrap the current block and just start over. I'm even a little apprehensive about the .030 gasket as the wire, about .010 would be into the copper about a third of the gasket thickness. I really don't want the orings or the copper gasket but I'm kind of forced to live with it right now.

Kind of weighing my options right now, I even put the existing block that I've already got too much money in up for sale to see if there would be any interest. I'm pretty frustrated but it's my own fault, I should have done more research before starting out with this block.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 AM.