LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

SS VS. WS6 comparision

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 1, 2004 | 07:34 PM
  #16  
8_4_berlinetta_'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 239
From: mobile alabama
Originally posted by 95GRNZ
Might want to try some other search words.

Found 4 threads for you and I'm sure there are more.

My 2 cents? Both are nice. Wouldn't mind owning either one, but I'm still happy with my Z28.

TS
thanks
Old Feb 1, 2004 | 07:38 PM
  #17  
Greed4Speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,507
From: FTW, TX
Hmmm.....

The SS has a Chevy bowtie and the WS6 TA has a Pontiac dart and there you have it!
Old Feb 1, 2004 | 07:47 PM
  #18  
kinyu's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 190
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally posted by Greed4Speed
WS6 TA has a Pontiac dart
lol, actually, I dont think the ws6 has the dart logo on it ;p
Old Feb 1, 2004 | 08:06 PM
  #19  
99blackSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,719
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally posted by kinyu
I havent seen actual numbers, but the ws6 has to be heavier (though not by much) . By the way, popular mechanics did an article a couple years ago on the 13 fastest production cars, and the firebird was a couple cars quicker than the camaro. The article said it was funny, being as how they are practicly twins ... but said the design was just a tad better for the firebird.
Well there you have it WS6 is faster.
Old Feb 1, 2004 | 08:31 PM
  #20  
Omega9's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 615
From: Lexington, Kentucky
Originally posted by kinyu
lol, actually, I dont think the ws6 has the dart logo on it ;p
Just on the wheels (01+), steering wheel, and under the hood. Oh, and the WS6 owns ALL.
Old Feb 1, 2004 | 08:44 PM
  #21  
kinyu's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 190
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally posted by 99blackSS
Well there you have it WS6 is faster.
I didnt write the article, I'm just telling you from memory what it said. So don't be a jackass by rolling your eyes

PS, I didnt say ws6 ... it could have been a formula.
Old Feb 1, 2004 | 08:59 PM
  #22  
kinyu's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 190
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally posted by 99blackSS
Well there you have it WS6 is faster.
In fact, Mr. eyeroller. Here is the camaro clip of the article:

"This Camaro SS, powered by the same 320-hp LS1 V8 as our Pontiac Firebird Formula WS-6, ran a 13.42 at 106.15 mph - more than quick enough to beat archrival Mustang and assure its place on the quickest-Camaros-of-all-time list. However, it's not even close to the blistering time delivered by the Pontiac. Why?

The answer, again, is traction. The Camaro is very difficult to launch cleanly. Too many revs, like anything over 1500, and the tires go up in smoke for all of First gear. Too few and the car bogs. The Firebird, however, is very easy to launch. Tach up to 2500 rpm, ride the clutch just a bit and you're out of there. Why the difference between the two seemingly identical cars? That's like asking why two socks go in the laundry and only one comes out. It's one of the mysteries of the world, especially when you consider that both cars wear the same-size Goodyear Eagle F1 tires, have the same engine, same gearing, etc.

Despite being slower than its GM brother, the Camaro is still one of the most fun cars to blast down the track thanks to its awesome engine, its strong clutch, its short throw shifter and its musclecar soundtrack. This car rumbles up to the line. It launches with a roar from its two exhaust pipes and it sounds like Steve McQueen's Mustang running after that Dodge Charger on the gear changes."

You like fruit? How 'bout them apples?
Old Feb 1, 2004 | 09:03 PM
  #23  
99blackSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,719
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally posted by kinyu
I didnt write the article, I'm just telling you from memory what it said. So don't be a jackass by rolling your eyes
Yes, you pointed out ONE magazine article in which the Firebird finished ahead of the Camaro. Are you saying you didn't imply that as the Firebird being faster? Why else would you mention it?

I am sure lots of magazines also ran a Camaro faster then a Firebird, comes down to the driver.
Old Feb 1, 2004 | 09:09 PM
  #24  
SSpdDmon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,747
From: Farmington, MI
The last article I saw listed the SS ahead of the WS6 on a road course because it handled the turns better. They said it had something to do with the WS6 being a little heavier (especially in the nose of the car). However, in straight line acceleration, the WS6 edges out the SS because of it's more efficient/direct intake. Other than that, they're the same car with different skins inside and out...
Old Feb 1, 2004 | 10:33 PM
  #25  
Antz97ZNJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,223
From: Browns Mills, New Jersey
same car
Old Feb 2, 2004 | 09:14 AM
  #26  
Lt1 and Ls1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,460
From: Texas
Same car except one looks like a catfish and the other a gorilla.
Old Feb 2, 2004 | 11:48 AM
  #27  
Greed4Speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,507
From: FTW, TX
Originally posted by Lt1 and Ls1
Same car except one looks like a catfish and the other a gorilla.
I've thought the same thing.
Old Feb 2, 2004 | 07:12 PM
  #28  
kinyu's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 190
From: Phoenix, AZ
lol, its just one for the ages ... like "is pepsi better than coke"?
Old Feb 2, 2004 | 07:19 PM
  #29  
Knowklew's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 897
From: Bartlett, IL
wow im surprised this didnt get locked yet
Old Feb 2, 2004 | 07:50 PM
  #30  
Lt1 and Ls1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,460
From: Texas
I knew it wasn't just me



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:18 AM.