SS VS. WS6 comparision
Originally posted by 95GRNZ
Might want to try some other search words.
Found 4 threads for you and I'm sure there are more.
My 2 cents? Both are nice. Wouldn't mind owning either one, but I'm still happy with my Z28.
TS
Might want to try some other search words.
Found 4 threads for you and I'm sure there are more.
My 2 cents? Both are nice. Wouldn't mind owning either one, but I'm still happy with my Z28.
TS
Originally posted by kinyu
I havent seen actual numbers, but the ws6 has to be heavier (though not by much) . By the way, popular mechanics did an article a couple years ago on the 13 fastest production cars, and the firebird was a couple cars quicker than the camaro. The article said it was funny, being as how they are practicly twins ... but said the design was just a tad better for the firebird.
I havent seen actual numbers, but the ws6 has to be heavier (though not by much) . By the way, popular mechanics did an article a couple years ago on the 13 fastest production cars, and the firebird was a couple cars quicker than the camaro. The article said it was funny, being as how they are practicly twins ... but said the design was just a tad better for the firebird.
Originally posted by 99blackSS
Well there you have it WS6 is faster.
Well there you have it WS6 is faster.

PS, I didnt say ws6 ... it could have been a formula.
Originally posted by 99blackSS
Well there you have it WS6 is faster.
Well there you have it WS6 is faster.
"This Camaro SS, powered by the same 320-hp LS1 V8 as our Pontiac Firebird Formula WS-6, ran a 13.42 at 106.15 mph - more than quick enough to beat archrival Mustang and assure its place on the quickest-Camaros-of-all-time list. However, it's not even close to the blistering time delivered by the Pontiac. Why?
The answer, again, is traction. The Camaro is very difficult to launch cleanly. Too many revs, like anything over 1500, and the tires go up in smoke for all of First gear. Too few and the car bogs. The Firebird, however, is very easy to launch. Tach up to 2500 rpm, ride the clutch just a bit and you're out of there. Why the difference between the two seemingly identical cars? That's like asking why two socks go in the laundry and only one comes out. It's one of the mysteries of the world, especially when you consider that both cars wear the same-size Goodyear Eagle F1 tires, have the same engine, same gearing, etc.
Despite being slower than its GM brother, the Camaro is still one of the most fun cars to blast down the track thanks to its awesome engine, its strong clutch, its short throw shifter and its musclecar soundtrack. This car rumbles up to the line. It launches with a roar from its two exhaust pipes and it sounds like Steve McQueen's Mustang running after that Dodge Charger on the gear changes."
You like fruit? How 'bout them apples?
Originally posted by kinyu
I didnt write the article, I'm just telling you from memory what it said. So don't be a jackass by rolling your eyes
I didnt write the article, I'm just telling you from memory what it said. So don't be a jackass by rolling your eyes
I am sure lots of magazines also ran a Camaro faster then a Firebird, comes down to the driver.
The last article I saw listed the SS ahead of the WS6 on a road course because it handled the turns better. They said it had something to do with the WS6 being a little heavier (especially in the nose of the car). However, in straight line acceleration, the WS6 edges out the SS because of it's more efficient/direct intake. Other than that, they're the same car with different skins inside and out...



Oh, and the WS6 owns ALL.