ported maf
ported maf
after seeing a bit of discussion on ported mafs, i just happened to read an article titled "LS1 Do's and Dont's" in the Summer 2004 Issue of Camaro Performers. Three "LS1 Experts" were polled on specific ideas...
there are a lot of helpful tips, along with this one regarding the maf
just figured this might clear up some confusion on the topic?
there are a lot of helpful tips, along with this one regarding the maf
DON'T: Port the Stock MAF
All our experts agree it's a bad idea. Here's why: A hogged-out mass airflow meter that hasn't been re-calibrated will likely cause all kinds of problems. For one, the metering element won't be able to communicate the difference in airflow. Consequently, the computer won't know there's actually more air entering the engine. The confusion between actual airflow and what the computer thinks is the airflow will likely cause drivability problems, and the computer will probably pull timing because it senses a lean condition. Less timing means less power.
'We've got turbocharged F-cars that make 500 horses at the tires running the stock MAF,' says Detroit Speedworks' Greg Banish. 'Cars with a few bolt-ons just don't need a higher-flowing mass air meter.'
Bill Strope concurs: "Trying to trick the computer just doesn't work,' he says. 'I usually refuse to tune a car that doesn't have the stock MAF, or at least, a correctly calibrated aftermarket meter.'
A MAF translator can help, but only with dyno-tested air/fuel measurements, says SLP's Brian Reese. 'And if you're going to all that trouble to port a MAF, just buy a calibrated 85mm meter,' he says. 'They're inexpensive any they work.'
All our experts agree it's a bad idea. Here's why: A hogged-out mass airflow meter that hasn't been re-calibrated will likely cause all kinds of problems. For one, the metering element won't be able to communicate the difference in airflow. Consequently, the computer won't know there's actually more air entering the engine. The confusion between actual airflow and what the computer thinks is the airflow will likely cause drivability problems, and the computer will probably pull timing because it senses a lean condition. Less timing means less power.
'We've got turbocharged F-cars that make 500 horses at the tires running the stock MAF,' says Detroit Speedworks' Greg Banish. 'Cars with a few bolt-ons just don't need a higher-flowing mass air meter.'
Bill Strope concurs: "Trying to trick the computer just doesn't work,' he says. 'I usually refuse to tune a car that doesn't have the stock MAF, or at least, a correctly calibrated aftermarket meter.'
A MAF translator can help, but only with dyno-tested air/fuel measurements, says SLP's Brian Reese. 'And if you're going to all that trouble to port a MAF, just buy a calibrated 85mm meter,' he says. 'They're inexpensive any they work.'
Re: ported maf
The only way it can possibly be good is if your running rich to some degree, and porting it causes you to lean it out. Even then, you are taking a complete guess how many points it will lean you out. It is a complete shot in the dark.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
colts0455
LT1 Based Engine Tech
18
Sep 2, 2015 12:41 PM



