LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

Pacesetter vs Mac

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2003, 11:52 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
14u2nv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tenn
Posts: 10
Pacesetter vs Mac

Which would be a better Header as far as performance gains and Quality . Thanks
14u2nv is offline  
Old 06-23-2003, 01:17 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Constrictor98TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 165
Re: Pacesetter vs Mac

Originally posted by 14u2nv
Which would be a better Header as far as performance gains and Quality . Thanks
I would universally choose any long tube header over Macs. Not to say that Macs aren't good, but theyre not long tubes!
Constrictor98TA is offline  
Old 06-23-2003, 06:16 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Camaro ChriSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canadian West Coast
Posts: 1,711
I would agree with the Pacesetters as they arte a LT design and should give you a few ponies more mostly stock, and maybe 10-12 more on a H/C setup. Personally, I'm waiting for some more dyno details on these before going with them, but they seem very good for the money.
Camaro ChriSS is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GREEN3112
Parts For Sale
3
02-10-2019 09:19 PM
RUENUF
Cars For Sale
6
03-13-2016 03:37 PM
football4life
Cars For Sale
2
10-04-2015 07:48 AM
GusarskiSS
Exhaust System
1
09-02-2015 03:51 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
2
08-24-2015 06:41 AM



Quick Reply: Pacesetter vs Mac



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:47 PM.