pace setters lt?
pace setters lt?
need headers and see most of you juping to the slp and pace-setter bandwagon. is it worth getting the p-s armour coated? any noticeable advantage coated with any brand? thanx in advance.
as stated, go for coated...still cheaper than uncoated hookers. They tend to have minor fitment issues, but the overall build quality is very good...i also dropped 6 tenths of a second from them (even with the pacesetter y-pipe interestingly enough
) so they do make some decent power.
) so they do make some decent power.
Check out speed inc. They have a new LT header called flow tech. They are made by a sister company of Hooker and look exactly like hooker LT's but at the pacesetter price. The first shipments will be in this week I believe and I can't wait for user feedback. In theory they would fit and perform like hooker LT's but have a pacesetter price tag.
Definately get the coated.
Good Luck
Definately get the coated.
Good Luck
coated anything has not proven ANY hp gains OR losses. and guess what, dont say they have because your WRONG. THEY HAVENT. yes they keep the engine bay a few degrees cooler. YAY. but not enough to increase or decress any HP. owned? think so. however in the long run yes it might prevent rust and unecessary wear so if ya have the extra $200-250 id get them coated.
anyways i like mine. and i think the pacesetter ORY is not to bad.. much better than stock and comparable to other after-market.. mayb you had a bad experience Antz97ZNJ?
another vote for pacesetters!
/tek.
anyways i like mine. and i think the pacesetter ORY is not to bad.. much better than stock and comparable to other after-market.. mayb you had a bad experience Antz97ZNJ?
another vote for pacesetters!
/tek.
Originally posted by tekker
coated anything has not proven ANY hp gains OR losses. and guess what, dont say they have because your WRONG. THEY HAVENT. yes they keep the engine bay a few degrees cooler. YAY. but not enough to increase or decress any HP. owned? think so. however in the long run yes it might prevent rust and unecessary wear so if ya have the extra $200-250 id get them coated.
anyways i like mine. and i think the pacesetter ORY is not to bad.. much better than stock and comparable to other after-market.. mayb you had a bad experience Antz97ZNJ?
another vote for pacesetters!
/tek.
coated anything has not proven ANY hp gains OR losses. and guess what, dont say they have because your WRONG. THEY HAVENT. yes they keep the engine bay a few degrees cooler. YAY. but not enough to increase or decress any HP. owned? think so. however in the long run yes it might prevent rust and unecessary wear so if ya have the extra $200-250 id get them coated.
anyways i like mine. and i think the pacesetter ORY is not to bad.. much better than stock and comparable to other after-market.. mayb you had a bad experience Antz97ZNJ?
another vote for pacesetters!
/tek.
Originally posted by tekker
coated anything has not proven ANY hp gains OR losses. and guess what, dont say they have because your WRONG. THEY HAVENT. yes they keep the engine bay a few degrees cooler. YAY. but not enough to increase or decress any HP. owned? think so. however in the long run yes it might prevent rust and unecessary wear so if ya have the extra $200-250 id get them coated.
anyways i like mine. and i think the pacesetter ORY is not to bad.. much better than stock and comparable to other after-market.. mayb you had a bad experience Antz97ZNJ?
another vote for pacesetters!
/tek.
coated anything has not proven ANY hp gains OR losses. and guess what, dont say they have because your WRONG. THEY HAVENT. yes they keep the engine bay a few degrees cooler. YAY. but not enough to increase or decress any HP. owned? think so. however in the long run yes it might prevent rust and unecessary wear so if ya have the extra $200-250 id get them coated.
anyways i like mine. and i think the pacesetter ORY is not to bad.. much better than stock and comparable to other after-market.. mayb you had a bad experience Antz97ZNJ?
another vote for pacesetters!
/tek.
its about an $80-$100 difference...if you live in the north east you might as well spring for it.
Originally posted by tekker
coated anything has not proven ANY hp gains OR losses. and guess what, dont say they have because your WRONG. THEY HAVENT. yes they keep the engine bay a few degrees cooler. YAY. but not enough to increase or decress any HP. owned? think so. however in the long run yes it might prevent rust and unecessary wear so if ya have the extra $200-250 id get them coated.
anyways i like mine. and i think the pacesetter ORY is not to bad.. much better than stock and comparable to other after-market.. mayb you had a bad experience Antz97ZNJ?
another vote for pacesetters!
/tek.
coated anything has not proven ANY hp gains OR losses. and guess what, dont say they have because your WRONG. THEY HAVENT. yes they keep the engine bay a few degrees cooler. YAY. but not enough to increase or decress any HP. owned? think so. however in the long run yes it might prevent rust and unecessary wear so if ya have the extra $200-250 id get them coated.
anyways i like mine. and i think the pacesetter ORY is not to bad.. much better than stock and comparable to other after-market.. mayb you had a bad experience Antz97ZNJ?
another vote for pacesetters!
/tek.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



