New spark plugs
#2
Re: New spark plugs
No experience with the ac delco's, I use NGK's myself, tr6's or 55's if a colder plug is needed. Seems a lot of other people do as well.
.040 is probably a bit toght for a mostly stock NA combo. I would however, gap them tighter than GM's f-body recommendation: try .050. People report better/smoother idle, and maybe even a tiny bit better performance with that gap. The Vette's are also gapped to that spec, so it wont harm anything.
.040 is probably a bit toght for a mostly stock NA combo. I would however, gap them tighter than GM's f-body recommendation: try .050. People report better/smoother idle, and maybe even a tiny bit better performance with that gap. The Vette's are also gapped to that spec, so it wont harm anything.
#3
Re: New spark plugs
Got the 41-110's in my 99 Z28 set at the stock (.040) gap and haven't noticed that much of a difference at all to be honest. Originally had the stock 41-952 (.060 gap) in there. A lot of guys in my area run the ngk tr55's and love em.
The reason gm went with the 41-110's was for a more "fuel" economical aspect. Before the plug change on my car I was getting an average of 27mpg, and it stayed the same after as well.
The reason gm went with the 41-110's was for a more "fuel" economical aspect. Before the plug change on my car I was getting an average of 27mpg, and it stayed the same after as well.
#4
Re: New spark plugs
Got the 41-110's in my 99 Z28 set at the stock (.040) gap and haven't noticed that much of a difference at all to be honest. Originally had the stock 41-952 (.060 gap) in there. A lot of guys in my area run the ngk tr55's and love em.
The reason gm went with the 41-110's was for a more "fuel" economical aspect.
The reason gm went with the 41-110's was for a more "fuel" economical aspect.
To the OP: NEVER CHANGE THE GAP ON AN IRIDIUM PLUG!!!!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post