My Yank Transmission story, or How I broke A th-400 with 320rwhp - CamaroZ28.Com Message Board

Go Back  CamaroZ28.Com Message Board > 1967-2002 Powertrain Discussion > LS1 Based Engine Tech
My Yank Transmission story, or How I broke A th-400 with 320rwhp >

My Yank Transmission story, or How I broke A th-400 with 320rwhp

LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

My Yank Transmission story, or How I broke A th-400 with 320rwhp

Reply

 
Old 07-18-2002, 05:14 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Plantation, FL USA
Posts: 4
Post My Yank Transmission story, or How I broke A th-400 with 320rwhp

I have never gotten loud about this, but I have had a hell of a time with Yank. Here is my death tally of Yank trannys:

Pro Yank 4L60E - 2-3 shift went bad, N20, 417 RWHP
Pro Yank 4L60E - 2-3 shift went bad, N20, 486 RWHP
Pro Yank TH-400 - 2.75 1st gear,Gearset disintegrated, all motor, 320rwhp, in the car 8 weeks
Pro-Yank TH-400 - 2.75 1st gear, Gearset problems, all motor, 320rwhp, in the car less than 4 weeks.

Now, let me make clear that Mike, the owner of Yank, has been pretty good about the whole thing. He paid some of my labor charges, and some of the shipping. However, this whole mess has cost me well over $1000 additional out of my own pocket. But through the whole ordeal, he has made something very clear to me.

He does not build these transmissions, nor is he responsible for them.

Not only does he farm out his work, but he is rather reluctant to stand behind any of it. It got to the point that I was dealing direct with the gentleman who DOES build them. And Mike's answer on a number of occasions was that he was not respobsible for ANY of it, and he was covering it out of the kindness of his heart.

My view is that, at least as far as the TH-400 goes, I never got what I paid for. I mean, his website says that it is good to 1000 horsepower. I NEVER hit one of the th-400's that blew up with the bottle. Both of them died on 100% motor, dynoed at 320rwhp. After the second one died, I requested a refund, as I felt that I had never gotten what I had paid for. He refused, and said that he'd help as much as he wished, and beyond that I was out of luck.

The whole reason behind this post is not necessarily to slam Yank. I just want EVERYONE to know what I went through, and how Yank feels they are responsible, or NOT responsible, for their transmissions.

- Matt

PS - I tried to be as fair as possible in this post, and stated pure fact. I would appreciate it if the mods would leave it here, or at least tell me what specifically they don't like about it, and not just delete it. Thanks.
Trans Am WS6 420 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2002, 06:35 PM
  #2  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Plantation, FL USA
Posts: 4
Post

Trans Am WS6 420 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2002, 09:29 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canadian West Coast
Posts: 1,711
Post

Sorry to hear your problems. I wish I had some answers. Frustrating.

The automotive industry is a scary one, and honestly, the minute you start modifying your car, you put yourself at the mercy of the mechanics/shops. It shouldn't be that way, but it is. There is always disclaimers made that "I'm not responsible..." or "This is just an estimate...".

The classic example for me is with a friend who just had a H/C set up done. Estimate was $4K. Turns out there were some slowdowns and stumbling blocks encountered and the bill was rising up to $6K very quick. Honestly, it wasn't a problem that the performance shop could forsee, nor the customer - so who should shoulder all the blame?

In my friend's case, he couldn't really just take the car away - it was in parts and a lot of work had been done right (by a good reputable shop too - not the type that you want to take your work away from). The shop is a good one and neither shop nor customer is to blame. Unfortunately, nothing is predictable when you mod the car, no warranties exist, and you have to be willing to accept the risks. In theory it should work, but in reality, so much can go wrong.

I really do feel your pain. And I think you post is fair, not singling out blame.

------------------
2000 Pewter SS #C161
SLP Dual-Dual, Bilstein suspension, Eibachs, 21mm/35mm swaybars, GMAF
SLP CAI w/lower plate, !EGR, Direct-Flo, SLP STB, Ported TB, ASP Crank pulley
SLP/AAM Differential cover, SLP 2600, Powershot, MSD wires, NGK's,
BMR Boxed LCAs, BMR PHB, G2 DSL, Heavy Lead Foot...
http://community.webshots.com/user/murlynd
Camaro ChriSS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2002, 07:58 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: vanc wa usa
Posts: 18
Post

I don't know the whole story, but I could buy you 5 turbo 400s out of junkyards that could hold 320 rwhp. Holy crap, I put 20000 miles on the turbo 400 in my 69 Cutlass with a decently built 455 in it without any trouble. That sucks so bad. Sorry.
brad-z is offline  
Reply With Quote
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
supercharged94Z28
Drivetrain
1
06-02-2015 04:32 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
05-18-2015 12:50 PM
BigWil
LT1 Based Engine Tech
12
03-29-2015 01:24 PM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
0
03-01-2015 02:33 PM
sscott
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
0
01-17-2015 05:30 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: My Yank Transmission story, or How I broke A th-400 with 320rwhp


Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.