LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

Help me pick a cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 09:49 AM
  #16  
Kraest's Avatar
Retired
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,166
From: Inside Uranus
Originally Posted by SSpdDmon
I think this is the main reason we were recommending that cam Kraest. Yes, he could make more power with a bigger cam. But, keeping the duration lower with a decent amount of lift will help keep the power band a little lower and in more "useable" RPMs. He'll still be shifting at 6500rpm with a 224 cam vs. the 6800~7000rpm shifts he would have to make to fully use the bigger duration cams that give another 10~15rwhp.
Honestly, that's completely incorrect info.

The F13 come 4 degrees advanced and will peak at around 6200 rpm. You shift it at around 6400-6500 max.

My F15 (236/239) was only ground with 2 degrees of advance and it peaked at 6600 in a 346ci motor.

The cam that's currently in my car is retarded 6 degrees to make it peak later since it's a small cam in a big cube motor.

Mike
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 09:51 AM
  #17  
Kraest's Avatar
Retired
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,166
From: Inside Uranus
Originally Posted by SSpdDmon
I think he meant you should learn a little more in depth about how cams make power with the timing of valve events, dynamic compression ratios, etc. If you have some reading time invested in those topics (frequently discussed over at LS1Tech.com's Internal Engine forum), you wouldn't need to ask which cam to recommend because you could make your own choice. Some people don't get that involved in the details and would like to have a little help so they can call it a day. Either way, I stand by my recommendation based on the criteria you established at the start of the thread.
Actually, if he spent time reading the amount of bull**** at LS1Tech, he'd be even more confused.
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 09:55 AM
  #18  
Kraest's Avatar
Retired
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,166
From: Inside Uranus
Originally Posted by WheelmanZ28
Hey Mike,

Is this the F13 you were talking about?

FMS Custom Grind Camshaft - 230"/232" .595"/.585" 112LSA - aggressive profile with a 2500-6800 RPM range, rough idle (from Futral site)

This cam is pretty intriguing to me, but it seems pretty beefy as well. Is that lift too high that stock heads will constrict flow? Would I be good with this cam if I waited a year and then added heads? That thing is pretty streetable huh?
Yep. That's the one.

It works perfectly on the stock heads and will work even better when you add a set of heads down the line. It's perfect for both NOW and LATER.

In MY opinion, the TR224 is too small for a heads/cam application because it peaks too early and doesn't fully utilize the extra amount of power that you can make with a good set of heads.

Simply put: You run out of cam with a 224 when you add heads.
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 09:58 AM
  #19  
WheelmanZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,158
From: Chicagoland Area
Originally Posted by Kraest
Actually, if he spent time reading the amount of bull**** at LS1Tech, he'd be even more confused.
lol. I posted over there and I have received NO useful information.

The good people at Camaroz28.com ftw.

Anyways, I'm not a total cam noob. I did a lot of the work on my LT1 and I have a very good understanding of dynamic and static compression, duration, lift in realtion to port size, etc. I'm by no means advanced, but I am familiar with the basics.

I am VERY new to the LS1 world. I wanted to gain familiarity with the different setups out there so I can make good decisions, thats why I ask these questions.

Back to the subject: Final gearing is difficult to determine. I was considering eventually stepping up to a 4.10, but that would be waaaaay in the future. I'm very comfortable with the 3.42 in my M6 (this is my manual car as well). I have also considered 3.73 in the past, but everyone seems to discourage that. So its stay 3.42 unless i decide to commit to 4.10 i suppose.
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 09:58 AM
  #20  
Kraest's Avatar
Retired
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,166
From: Inside Uranus
Originally Posted by YBNORMEL
Something that hasn't been discussed is what final gear ratio are you going to use. If you are staying with the stock rear gears then a FM 13 is probably as big as you want to go for drivabililty. The 224/224 comp is a good daily driver cam.
Yep. The F13 will work fine with the stock 3.42s, but I'd recommend getting a 4.10 with a 6-speed for more fun

My buddy has been daily driving his F14 Vette for the last 20,000 miles in the last year without a problem.
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 10:00 AM
  #21  
Kraest's Avatar
Retired
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,166
From: Inside Uranus
Originally Posted by WheelmanZ28
lol. I posted over there and I have received NO useful information.

The good people at Camaroz28.com ftw.

Anyways, I'm not a total cam noob. I did a lot of the work on my LT1 and I have a very good understanding of dynamic and static compression, duration, lift in realtion to port size, etc. I'm by no means advanced, but I am familiar with the basics.

I am VERY new to the LS1 world. I wanted to gain familiarity with the different setups out there so I can make good decisions, thats why I ask these questions.

Back to the subject: Final gearing is difficult to determine. I was considering eventually stepping up to a 4.10, but that would be waaaaay in the future. I'm very comfortable with the 3.42 in my M6 (this is my manual car as well). I have also considered 3.73 in the past, but everyone seems to discourage that. So its stay 3.42 unless i decide to commit to 4.10 i suppose.
I like the 4.10s in the 6-speed because it makes 6th gear actually usable. The 3.42s make it hard to use 6th under 70-80 mph.
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 10:09 AM
  #22  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
I say that your rear gear selection depends on your plans for the car.

If you're going to stay at near-stock power, I'd say 4.10 all the way. The problem is that with 4.10 gears and a stock rev limiter, you're limited to 115.3mph in the quarter (unless you want to shift to 5th gear, which is generally not considered a good idea with respect to minimizing your ET). If you're willing to increase your rev limit to 6500, you can go 120.9mph without shifting to 5th.

So, figure out how fast you want to go on your days at the strip, and figure out if you care about shifting to 5th gear. Figure out what the extra 1-2 highway mpg with 3.73s is worth to you.

Once you know those things, it should be pretty easy to decide.
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 10:13 AM
  #23  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by Kraest
I like the 4.10s in the 6-speed because it makes 6th gear actually usable. The 3.42s make it hard to use 6th under 70-80 mph.
What? I use 6th at 50-55mph all the time (about 1100 rpm). There's not much power, but the car can accelerate well enough, and it's fine with the cruise control set, and I don't mind dropping a gear (or two, or three, or four) when I want better acceleration.
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 10:31 AM
  #24  
Greed4Speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,507
From: FTW, TX
You'll find the trend in the US LS1 world at the moment is towards overly large cams. People are running MS3, MS4 and TRex cams in daily drivers. In Australia they're running narrower LSA, larger lift, shorter duration cams and making great power too. Then you also need to take into consideration how often you're willing to play around with valve springs. More agressive cams will wear them out quicker.

You need to decide if these large cams are good for you or not. Go onto another board or even a different local section of the same board and you'll get more MS3 recommendations than F13 or vice versa. It just depends on whats popular locally.

Another thing to consider is that you usually only hear the good reports on a specific grind. A friend of mine went from the stock like GT2-3 cam that was making 400 hp w/ported heads (from GTP) to the F13 with the same heads and only made a couple more hp. Long story short he is back to the GT2-3.

Why post about this on tech when you can search and find a plethora of data to answer your question for yourself. Thats probably why you didn't get help over there. When a forum sees this same question asked daily it tends to get ignored.
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 11:29 AM
  #25  
WheelmanZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,158
From: Chicagoland Area
wow great information guys, thank you so much.

It sounds like I am going to have to make some choice on driveability vs power and make a few sacrafices. I'm still paying for the car, so I don't want to commit to an all out power-based setup just yet.

A little more then a Mild cam that I can run on stock heads, but potentially later upgrade with heads that has a smooth mid-rpm powerband would be preferred.

Jake - that was some very helpful information for the strip, thank you.
Kraest - you have me sold on the 4.10s earlier than I wanted to be I still think I'm gonna run with the 3.42s for another year or so, maybe upgrade them when I do heads next season.

It seems like this thread is turning into the 224 vs the F13. Is there something in the middle ground that would satisfy my preferences, or should I commit to a setup featuing one of those?

Thanks again!
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 12:29 PM
  #26  
SSpdDmon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,747
From: Farmington, MI
Originally Posted by Kraest
Honestly, that's completely incorrect info.

The F13 come 4 degrees advanced and will peak at around 6200 rpm. You shift it at around 6400-6500 max.

My F15 (236/239) was only ground with 2 degrees of advance and it peaked at 6600 in a 346ci motor.

The cam that's currently in my car is retarded 6 degrees to make it peak later since it's a small cam in a big cube motor.

Mike
Guess I was off a little. I should know better than to assume...

Anyway, did you see this thread Wheelman?

http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showth...ight=224%2F228
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 12:49 PM
  #27  
Kraest's Avatar
Retired
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,166
From: Inside Uranus
Originally Posted by WheelmanZ28
wow great information guys, thank you so much.

It sounds like I am going to have to make some choice on driveability vs power and make a few sacrafices. I'm still paying for the car, so I don't want to commit to an all out power-based setup just yet.

A little more then a Mild cam that I can run on stock heads, but potentially later upgrade with heads that has a smooth mid-rpm powerband would be preferred.

Jake - that was some very helpful information for the strip, thank you.
Kraest - you have me sold on the 4.10s earlier than I wanted to be I still think I'm gonna run with the 3.42s for another year or so, maybe upgrade them when I do heads next season.

It seems like this thread is turning into the 224 vs the F13. Is there something in the middle ground that would satisfy my preferences, or should I commit to a setup featuing one of those?

Thanks again!
Once again, I don't think the 224 is a great choice because you're leaving alot on the table once you do heads. You want to do a good cam for both now and later. The F-13 is honestly very drivable and makes great power cam-only and heads/cam.

With that being said, a cam in the middle of the two that also has seen great success (I've seen it hit over 450rwhp with a heads/cam setup) would be the F-11.

Mike
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 06:44 PM
  #28  
Greed4Speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,507
From: FTW, TX
F-11 or any 226 or 228 grind with decent lobes. Different lobe designs is another area I'd suggest you investigate before buying a cam.
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 07:22 PM
  #29  
Zitty'sZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 217
From: Homestead,FL
Originally Posted by Greed4Speed
F-11 or any 226 or 228 grind with decent lobes. Different lobe designs is another area I'd suggest you investigate before buying a cam.
I agree, you mentioned that you might add a set of Patriot heads later on, are you aware that they sell a 226/226- 585/585 with a 112 lsa that is pretty popular and a very good price of $ 280 or somewhere close to that price. That is the cam I bought, but I still have not gotten around to installing it yet ,but I have heard it in someone elses car and it sounded awesome.
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 11:31 AM
  #30  
Greed4Speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,507
From: FTW, TX
I'm running a 226/226 grind. It isn't Patriot though its a GTP420.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:58 PM.