Head and Cam or Forced Induction?
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 411
From: Harrisburg, NC/Jacksonville, FL
Head and Cam or Forced Induction?
Well which route would be the best way to go to get some good power and still have a reliable car? Also which is the better "bang for the buck"? Im about to get an LS1 and was j/w which way would be best to go. Ls1 is stock except for long-tubes and GMMG exhaust and is an A4 by the way. Any help is appreciated. 
My goals are 390-400rwhp and i would really like to stay N/A with the head/cam but if this is an unrealistic goal going the N/A route than just tell me and i can lower it.
My goals are 390-400rwhp and i would really like to stay N/A with the head/cam but if this is an unrealistic goal going the N/A route than just tell me and i can lower it.
Last edited by Skyhawk; Oct 24, 2004 at 01:43 AM.
Registered User
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 969
From: St. Louis, MO
Re: Head and Cam or Forced Induction?
blower on stock internals is asking for trouble. You'll be puking rods in no time unless you baby the car, and then what's the point of a blower? All bolt-ons and a cam alone will get you ~ 375-400 rwhp depeing on the cam.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM