LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

Dyno So Low Its Pathetic!!!!

Old Sep 11, 2006 | 11:55 PM
  #1  
ZachXSmith's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 116
From: Frankenmuth, MI
Dyno So Low Its Pathetic!!!!

My car put down 305 h.p. with 333 torque. with listed mods after tune on mustang dyno??? 284 h.p 301 torque before headers..

Last edited by ZachXSmith; Sep 13, 2006 at 12:05 AM.
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 11:56 PM
  #2  
ZachXSmith's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 116
From: Frankenmuth, MI
Re: Dyno So Low Its Pathetic!!!!

ls6 intake was not on during the dyno, just bought it on the forums..
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 12:08 AM
  #3  
AL SS590 M6's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 1998
Posts: 6,247
From: Charlotte,MI USA
Re: Dyno So Low Its Pathetic!!!!

Originally Posted by ZachXSmith
My car put down 305 h.p. with 333 torque. with listed mods after tune on mustang dyno??? something is wrong I believe!! No signs of anything being wrong??

All you have is a lid and headers. What did you expect? 305 on a Mustang is = to ~ 330 on a dyno jet.
I ran 12.15 @ 110 mph with just 314 at the wheels on a dynojet. Dyno #s mean squat.
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 01:16 AM
  #4  
Bayer-Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,592
From: N Falmouth MA
Re: Dyno So Low Its Pathetic!!!!

Need a tune

Check my low dyno # thread.

Last edited by Bayer-Z28; Sep 12, 2006 at 01:28 AM.
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 01:45 AM
  #5  
shock6906's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,577
From: Sandy VJJville
Re: Dyno So Low Its Pathetic!!!!

I've read that track times are a much better way to measure your car than the wavering numbers that various dyno's can give you.
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 06:20 AM
  #6  
teke184's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 8,319
From: US 1 Mile Marker 52 in the Florida Keys
Re: Dyno So Low Its Pathetic!!!!

the slp air temp module is probably causeing you some timing retard on the top end...check out the tread on it in the "general tech" forum....

and like stated, you have minimal real world mods. not to mention you're losing a few hp due to the heavy *** 17x11 rims...and not having the ls6 intake.

for a mustang dyno i think you're pretty much on the money...partucularly with no tune.
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 07:29 AM
  #7  
psychocabbage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,901
From: Houston, Tx USA
Re: Dyno So Low Its Pathetic!!!!

what I find funny is how people dont have any baseline runs on the same dyno before mods then complain when they finally do get on a dyno..
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 08:31 AM
  #8  
iamsickofitall's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 105
From: Nutley, NJ
Re: Dyno So Low Its Pathetic!!!!

Originally Posted by psychocabbage
what I find funny is how people dont have any baseline runs on the same dyno before mods then complain when they finally do get on a dyno..
yup...there's no way to make an accurate comparison. for all we know, the car could have been putting down 250 to the wheels out of the factory

Originally Posted by shock6906
I've read that track times are a much better way to measure your car than the wavering numbers that various dyno's can give you.
yup...dyno's are just a tuning tool, the numbers mean NOTHING. I beat cars on the street that run mid 11's in the 1/4 with a RWHP number that would theoretically only get me low 12's, high 11's


you were also on a mustang dyno. those put a decent load on the car and will give you a lower reading than a dynojet. the extra load, however, does make it easier to give the car a more precise tune.
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 09:13 AM
  #9  
SLED28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 133
From: Toronto,Canada
Re: Dyno So Low Its Pathetic!!!!

Originally Posted by ZachXSmith
My car put down 305 h.p. with 333 torque. with listed mods after tune on mustang dyno??? something is wrong I believe!! No signs of anything being wrong??
Mustang dynos are 10-15% lower then a dynojet, your at least 330rwhp
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 10:19 AM
  #10  
myslowcamaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,326
From: fairless hills pa
Re: Dyno So Low Its Pathetic!!!!

Originally Posted by AL SS590 M6
I ran 12.15 @ 110 mph with just 314 at the wheels on a dynojet. Dyno #s mean squat.
just like al said, it dont mean a thing. look at his run with 314rwhp, i ran almost the same time 11.87-12.1 @ 118 (two differant tracks) with 420rwhp. the 106 extra hp didnt help me much in my case. now he may have some better mods than me to make up the differance. im on a stock tc, dont know if al is or not, and i dont have any suspension work done. anyway, dyno numbers dont mean anything at the track or on the road.
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 10:47 AM
  #11  
fastdan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 79
From: Palm Coast, Florida
Re: Dyno So Low Its Pathetic!!!!

That's actually a good number for having a lid and headers. Most LS1's dyno about 290-320 stock. Your lid and headers gave you 10 whp tops.

Dan
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 11:12 AM
  #12  
Kraest's Avatar
Retired
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,166
From: Inside Uranus
Re: Dyno So Low Its Pathetic!!!!

Sounds right to me. Don't know why you're freaking out.
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 12:24 PM
  #13  
iamsickofitall's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 105
From: Nutley, NJ
Re: Dyno So Low Its Pathetic!!!!

Originally Posted by fastdan
That's actually a good number for having a lid and headers. Most LS1's dyno about 290-320 stock. Your lid and headers gave you 10 whp tops.

Dan
you're not taking into account that it's a mustang dyno...that range you gave is what people usually see on a dynojet. the higher end being 01-02 F-bodies that came with the LS6 Intake out of the box.
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 12:39 PM
  #14  
scrmnws6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 321
Re: Dyno So Low Its Pathetic!!!!

Not as bad as a friends Mustang...

Had the whole engine rebuilt, all forged parts etc., put down 142 hp to the wheels. The guy who built this engine just stole the 15k from him and set him up with a completely f'ed up engine.
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 12:55 PM
  #15  
myslowcamaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,326
From: fairless hills pa
Re: Dyno So Low Its Pathetic!!!!

Originally Posted by scrmnws6
Not as bad as a friends Mustang...

Had the whole engine rebuilt, all forged parts etc., put down 142 hp to the wheels. The guy who built this engine just stole the 15k from him and set him up with a completely f'ed up engine.

ouch ...... kill the guy

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 AM.