Overal, comparison- Iroc, C-3, C-4
ANYONE HERE HAVE ANY OF THESES CARS??
POWERWISE?
EASE OF MAINTENANCE?
LEAST MAINTENANCE?
COST?
HANDLING ,
RELIABILITY?
350 CU. IN.
LETS SAY THERE WERE ALL $5000

LETS SAY ALL 150,000 MILES?
Last edited by ketanojaun; Feb 6, 2007 at 02:02 PM.
IROC hands down.
C-4's had the same TPI engine,just aluminum heads...its slow (for me). I dont like the C4 body style.
Once you drive a real IROC,then you'll understand.
Edit: StOp UsInG CaPiTaL lEtTeRs. A capital letter indicates a new sentence,a name,or a place.
C-4's had the same TPI engine,just aluminum heads...its slow (for me). I dont like the C4 body style.
Once you drive a real IROC,then you'll understand.
Edit: StOp UsInG CaPiTaL lEtTeRs. A capital letter indicates a new sentence,a name,or a place.
I totally agree,go for a 4th gen LT1.3rd Gen Irocs are o.k but don't have much top end power,quite torquey but run out of steam after 100mph,unlike the LT1 which is just getting into it's stride.I would also recommend the manual over the auto.
Best regards,Mark.
Best regards,Mark.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mark0006
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
0
Feb 28, 2015 07:12 PM
guionM
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
0
Sep 5, 2002 09:20 AM



