General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech For general F-Body discussion that does not fit in any other forum.
For F-Body Technical/Information Discussion ONLY

c4 vs. 95 z28

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 25, 2005 | 05:28 PM
  #1  
unvc92camarors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,769
From: cinci
c4 vs. 95 z28

which one is gonna be nicer?
i know the vette should be about even with the z, but how are they habndling wise?
which one do you think would be better?

and yea, i'm THINKING of trading or selling the z, but probably not
but then again, vettes are really nice...
Old Feb 25, 2005 | 05:37 PM
  #2  
WestCoast96Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 669
From: San Jose, CA
Re: c4 vs. 95 z28

C4.

It's a Vette. Yeah, there's some nostalgic with our F-bodies, b/c most of us put so much time into them. Kinda cool to modify and see gains as you add more stuff.

Also, don't forget..you can modify the C4 as well...just cost you a hell of a lot more.

Why don't you go to a dealership and take a used C4 for a ride first.

Personally, I can't afford buying a $50K car...rather dump $10K into my $18K used Z28 and be happy with it.

You'll be happy either way...
Old Feb 25, 2005 | 10:09 PM
  #3  
1 Nasty Bird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 449
From: CHI-TOWN
Re: c4 vs. 95 z28

Originally Posted by WestCoast96Z28
you can modify the C4 as well...just cost you a hell of a lot more....

What he said!
Old Feb 26, 2005 | 12:15 AM
  #4  
Lt1t56's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 567
From: Texas
Re: c4 vs. 95 z28

I work at a shop that specializes in Corvettes only, and would rather own a F body. Corvette opti-sparks are harder to change due to the way the hood opens and no access from the bottom, clutch replacement is a lot more $ due to the fact the ZF 6 speed has a dual mass fly-wheel that needs to be replaced with the clutch and cant be resurfaced, the build quality is no better than the F body... seats fall apart like crazy, weatherstrips fall apart, etc... independant rear suspension has more parts that can fail. A/C components are more $ than an F body. I could type more things but I think you get the idea. And as stated above they are expensive to repair.
Old Feb 26, 2005 | 04:44 PM
  #5  
Z95m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,070
From: newton, kansas, USA
Re: c4 vs. 95 z28

4th gen Camaros Own C4's in looks
Old Feb 26, 2005 | 06:19 PM
  #6  
1quikZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 293
From: Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: c4 vs. 95 z28

It's a Vette. Yeah, there's some nostalgic with our F-bodies, b/c most of us put so much time into them.
Yeah we do put a lot of time into them, But I think there is just as much nostalga in a stock camaro/firebird as a vette. Its all in the eyes of a beholder, there is still a strong following to impala SS's and their FWD slugs now,(2006 will change that statement ) but to somepeople thats even better than any vette or f body. As far as handling goes i could spend 5k and make my handling way better than a stock vette and would still ring in at far less total price. Ultimately only can decide which one is going to be nicer, and whatever you choose no one can say you wrong b/c you like it and thats all that matters.

Just my .02 cents
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 07:40 AM
  #7  
Deckstripes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 209
Re: c4 vs. 95 z28

C4 versus 4th gen- It's 4th gen all the way for me. The performance of the two is so close that I'm not willing to give up the utility of the backseat and hatch. $50K???? Are you sure you're not thinking C5? A real nice C4 can be scored in the 20s, even in the teens. Now C5 versus 4th gen, the camaro goes down in flames. But it better for the $30K difference.
Zero argument on the image. My 30th annv car is pretty high profile, but can't compete with a plain-jane vette for curb appeal. That sux. Later
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 05:33 PM
  #8  
BadCo.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 226
Re: c4 vs. 95 z28

Originally Posted by Z95m6
4th gen Camaros Own C4's in looks
...yours does anyway! I took a look at your page/site
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 11:23 PM
  #9  
soontobeGN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 483
From: South Jersey
Re: c4 vs. 95 z28

Originally Posted by Deckstripes
The performance of the two is so close that I'm not willing to give up the utility of the backseat and hatch.
Are we all forgetting the dog days of the 80's pre LT1 C4's? I have layed waste to many an L98 car and that was when I was stock. I think they were rated at 230 HP from the factory. That is.....dare I say it......SN95 territory. Then you have to factor in the old-cocky-bastard-that-cant-drive factor of the people that USUALLY own vettes, and that leaves the 4th Gen F-body as the winner in this comparo.......
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 12:49 AM
  #10  
AronZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,276
From: Chattanoga & Franklin
Re: c4 vs. 95 z28

Have you ever tried getting into a C4? Its a royal pita with the high door sill. One great thing nobody has mentioned is that the Vette is lighter. It also comes with wider tires stock.

I think I'd choose the fbody for a daily driver, but definetly the Vette for the occasional weekend toy.
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 11:58 AM
  #11  
unvc92camarors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,769
From: cinci
Re: c4 vs. 95 z28

yea well, i'm gonna see if it's still there
good chance it's an auto anyways, so if it is, there is no way i'm getting it
autos are nice for d/d (like my rs) but my fun toy needs to be a stick
i'll let you guys know what i do, thanks for all the opinions/advice
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 12:06 PM
  #12  
Z28SORR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,768
From: Friendswood, TX, USA
Re: c4 vs. 95 z28

Over the years I've owned both. I sold my 87 Vette to get my 97 SS. I've always leaned towards Camaro's because of the dollar vers. perfomance ratio.
Near Vette performance at Camaro prices. The LT1 Vette vers. the LT1 Camaro is pretty much a heads up for me. I like both. It would just depend on the deal.
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 12:22 PM
  #13  
OutsiderIROC-Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,688
From: Middle of Kansas
Re: c4 vs. 95 z28

Originally Posted by AronZ28
Have you ever tried getting into a C4? Its a royal pita with the high door sill.
I was gonna say the same thing.
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 03:03 PM
  #14  
Janny's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 677
Re: c4 vs. 95 z28

I had the same choice to make a while back and I kept the Camaro. It looks nicer. It is cheaper and easier to work on. In terms of performance, the Camaro is on par with and cheaper to mod than the c4. The c4 is a freaking rattle trap full of squeaks etc. Ugh!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 29, 2015 07:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 11, 2015 06:10 PM
dbusch22
LT1 Based Engine Tech
2
Jan 5, 2015 07:14 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Dec 28, 2014 06:20 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:20 PM.