CamaroZ28.Com Message Board

CamaroZ28.Com Message Board (https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/)

- General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech (https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/general-1967-2002-f-body-tech-46/)

- - 3.42s vs. 3.73s (https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/general-1967-2002-f-body-tech-46/3-42s-vs-3-73s-296038/)

99BlackTA

08-28-2004 10:24 AM

3.42s vs. 3.73s

3.42s or 3.73s in an auto LT1 daily driver?

n2ceptor

08-28-2004 10:45 AM

Re: 3.42s vs. 3.73s

This has been discussed quite a few times... Conduct a search and you will probably find your answer...:)

http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=252904

Donohue96M6Z28

08-29-2004 01:28 AM

Re: 3.42s vs. 3.73s

410s ;)

silversupersport

08-29-2004 04:25 AM

Re: 3.42s vs. 3.73s

if i had an auto i would go with 3.73's or 4.10's with a manual. if you already have 3.23's then i dont see the point in going to a 3.42, unless you are only interested in 1/4 mile times. 3.73's= way more fun for a daily driver. :)

87DJP2001

08-29-2004 08:31 AM

Re: 3.42s vs. 3.73s

3:42 if you enjoy driving your car under all conditions. ;)

Dave89IROC

08-29-2004 09:17 AM

Re: 3.42s vs. 3.73s

I put 3.73's in a 305 TBI A4 third gen, love them, still good on the freeway, and great around town, and almost no impact on fuel mileage

Skull Leader

08-30-2004 02:01 AM

Re: 3.42s vs. 3.73s

Quote:

Originally Posted by SupaChargdZ28

410s ;)

YEAH!!!!! I knew a guy that had 4.10s in his A4 93Z. On the highway, he'd be around 4000 rpms cruising at 50. :lol:

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 PM.