1997 z28 or 1986 iroc z28
05-28-2008, 02:07 PM
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Jacksonville,FL
Posts: 21
Being that it's an 86, yeah. The 86's were the slowest ones (even slower than the 85's). A V6 4th gen isn't going to best the later ones though. A 90-92 IROC/Z28 with the L98 will give an LT1 a run for its money when comparing stock to stock.
05-28-2008, 02:09 PM
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 284
I've never heard of a stock l98 IROC/z28 going faster than mid 14s. Got any videos or anything?
05-28-2008, 02:12 PM
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lansing, MI via Bowling Green, KY: Dalton, GA: Nashville, TN & Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,026
I bought a blue '85 IROC brand new. That car was sharp as hell, and was the talk of my hometown for a couple of weeks, but it was the biggest POS I have ever owned.
05-28-2008, 02:28 PM
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cody,Wyoming 82414
Posts: 564
Like previously stated you do have a lot more space to work with in the engine bay of the 3rd Gen and cramming a BBC is very common with those cars. Depends whether or not the car you're looking for will be a Project or a DD. As far as reliability the 1997 z28 would be the best bet, especially if it's 6speed.
Last edited by Kaj; 05-28-2008 at 02:32 PM.
05-28-2008, 02:33 PM
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kingston Springs, TN
Posts: 279
Remember L98's had more stock torque than LT1's and only 50 less ponies tops... Comparitively, they also had a better gear ratio stock (3.23 I believe) than the 2.73 geared LT1 A4's...
05-28-2008, 02:53 PM
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 220