Forced Induction Supercharger/Turbocharger

turbo or supercharger...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 9, 2003 | 01:56 PM
  #1  
glennxx1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 491
From: south carolina
turbo or supercharger...

whats the plus sides to turbo....u have lag, where as supercharger u dont ...im debating on what i want to do with my engine..if i want supercharger or if i want to turbo it, ive never seen any1 with a turbocharged camaro, well turbo v8 anything around where i live, and that'd be the unique part, plus i could stop worrying about getting headers, is there a turbo kit that will let it still be my every day driver? for instance comes with all the remounting parts to keep AC and all that? or do you have to forget about ac and all when you get it ...whats safe amount of boost to go with on a stock lt1, and what kinda gains would you be looking at getting?...i watched the 525 hp 600 torq video and...it doesnt have the extreme blow off like a eclipse gsx that'd be what i'd want...can you have that with camaros or no?
Old Oct 9, 2003 | 02:02 PM
  #2  
JZ 97 SS 1500's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 762
From: Huntsville, Alabama
Turbo is the way to go, and yes you can have the blow-off sounds if you want...just have to put on a loud blow-off, like an HKS SSQV, or Tial 6 port.

Jose
Old Oct 9, 2003 | 02:05 PM
  #3  
glennxx1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 491
From: south carolina
whats the deal on increasing boost...at 1500 rpms u only have 3-4? and then 5000 or 6000 u have 8 or 9?...but supercharger u have 8 psi from idle basicly till u let off...or does turbo kick to max boost faster than that?

and what kinda boost would u wanna run on stock lt1? ...sense i have 100k miles would i want to do a rebuild b4 i put her on there? or get dished pistons at least?...i'd prob wanna get 8 or 8.5:1 pistons then i get heads done to put me up 2 9 or 9.5:1 or not smart? leave the heads alone and get higher compression pistons? (higher than 8 or 8.5:1)

Last edited by glennxx1; Oct 9, 2003 at 02:09 PM.
Old Oct 9, 2003 | 02:30 PM
  #4  
mongse_1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,450
From: Belleville, IL
A supercharger makes boost based on the speed of the crankshaft(since it spins the impeller). Since a turbo is exhaust driven, it doesn't have a linear curve(straight) and boost will typically increase faster at higher RPMs.

Turbo is definitely the way to go. Little to no lag with a small block because the motor moves more air than a 4-banger of V6.

The BOV sound can be changed like Jose said. Some BOVs are quieter for the stealthy approach, some are loud and let everyone know what you're running.
Old Oct 9, 2003 | 03:01 PM
  #5  
JZ 97 SS 1500's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 762
From: Huntsville, Alabama
Like mongse_1 said, a S/C is more linear on boost. With a turbo you can hit peak boost very quickly and hold it over the entire rpm range. As for how much boost on stock motor...well I hear anything below 7-8psi is marginally safe. Doesn't really matter how much boost you run, its still going to need a rebuild if you wanting to make any real hp #'s. For compression...I personally would go 9:1 or below.

Jose
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 12:29 AM
  #6  
TimbrSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 392
From: Columbus, Ohio
I'm not convinced that turbo is definitely the way to go. You have to look at each situation individually.

A turbo may be the way to go, if you have unlimited funds, and/or the skills to fabricate your own setup. You could go with one of the few kits available, but if you want a monster setup, you'll be peicing your system together. You will aso have a harder time getting it tuned, and will most likely need an aftermarket fi system if you are going for 600+hp. The PTK kit looks good for a LT1 street car.

A supercharger, (and I'm talkin centrifical for LT1's, LS1's) will be cheaper, and easier to install and setup. Vortech and ATI are both good choices. Because of the linear boost, it will be easier to tune, and the stock computer can be used, even on some beastly cars like LJ's. Since the SC kits are more common, and have been out longer, it's easier to find help troubleshooting problems. You can have a BOV on a SC too, and you get that cool whine.


Either system on a built motor can can provide enough power to render street tires useless at 65mph. Either system will drive pretty much like stock, and isn't really noticed, till you mash the gas.

If I was trying to build a car to break all the LT1 records, and had 1.5 craploads of cash to do it with, and the skill and time to put it together, I'd go big single turbo. But then again, the records that'd I would be trying to break have been set by SC'd cars.

For the cheap (well, at least cheaper) and easier setup, on a street car I'm just looking to have lots of fun with, and still be faster than 99% of the cars on the road, I'll take a SC.
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 09:32 AM
  #7  
glennxx1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 491
From: south carolina
but can i push as much boost with a sc as a turbo?...and just curius (i have a 91 z tuneport with a paxton supercharger..would sound sick with blow off valve
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 09:41 AM
  #8  
kmook's Avatar
Advanced Tech Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,262
From: Nashville
Originally posted by glennxx1
but can i push as much boost with a sc as a turbo?...and just curius (i have a 91 z tuneport with a paxton supercharger..would sound sick with blow off valve
Either can do what is needed. 25lbs sound good? Either a turbo or blower can provide that.

And blowers cant really use a BOV like turbos due, and have the same effect/sound. I've tried it.
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 11:27 AM
  #9  
Markbo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 117
From: Houston
Originally posted by glennxx1
but can i push as much boost with a sc as a turbo?...and just curius (i have a 91 z tuneport with a paxton supercharger..would sound sick with blow off valve
Boost is boost, it doesn't matter how you obtain it. There are guys running 30 pounds of boost around here (Houston) on S/C's. Anything is possible with the right equipment and enough money.
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 11:34 AM
  #10  
Rival's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 165
From: il
The tubro will be more work in the long run and most likely cost more too. It does have a few advantages over a blower but if you going to have a forced induction car your going to put up big numbers any way you do it. Provided that you have a forged bottom end and a fuel system. Do you have any real power goals? With all the tubro threads going around you probably want one of them. But I wouldn't rule out a sc too quick. There are so much more popular and easier to get tuned. I am not sure about your mechanical level and the less you have the more money you will be spending at a shop. Read in here for a bit, you will find out what you want to do with your money pretty quick.
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 01:08 PM
  #11  
glennxx1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 491
From: south carolina
i want to basicly run 10.5-11 and it be my every day car...that is my goal
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 02:57 PM
  #12  
mongse_1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,450
From: Belleville, IL
You'll have a lot of money sank into it if you want to run 10.xx and drive it everyday. If those are the goals, I'd consider nitrous.

One other thing that I do like about turbochargers over superchargers is the lack of stress on the cranksnout by the turbo. The belt on a high-boost setup will put quite a bit of stress on a crank. Even at 12#, I was running a double keyed crank hub.

Last edited by mongse_1; Oct 10, 2003 at 02:59 PM.
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 08:18 PM
  #13  
TimbrSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 392
From: Columbus, Ohio
Originally posted by kmook
And blowers cant really use a BOV like turbos due, and have the same effect/sound. I've tried it.
When I let off the gas coming off of boost, or even at high rpm, my BOV goes "PSSHHHHHHHHHHHH" I think it sounds badass, many people agree. I haven't heard anyone say they didn't like it. You musta done something wrong.
Old Oct 14, 2003 | 09:26 AM
  #14  
glennxx1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 491
From: south carolina
single turbo system runs off of 1 header or is at the y pipe? does turbo need to cool after you'v run it hard? or is that waht innercooler is for?
Old Oct 14, 2003 | 09:47 AM
  #15  
Turbocharged's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 54
From: Utah
Turbo is the way to go. You can choose how much boost you want with the flip of a switch. You can run 5 psi to wheel around town, then flip to 20 (if you want) when somebody pulls up next to you and wants to run.

We need to coin a new term called Supercharger Lag. Cause every centrifugal supercharger has it. Why do people think they will get full boost at idle from a supercharger? And then go buy a centrifugal supercharger? If you want full boost at any rpm put a 6-71 on it. Don't think you are going to get it from an ATI or Procharger or Vortech. They have LAG clear to redline and fall on their face with every shift. If you want to run any more than 10 or 12 psi you will tear the hub off your crank and smoke your belt. I've run almost every kind of supercharger, blower, turbo, NOS, you name it for over 20 years, and I'm sold on turbos.

Our STS turbo kit bolts on with no modifications in about 3 hours and we put down 522 RWHP and 620 RWTQ with stock heads, stock cam, stock fuel system, stock computer, automatic trans and 2.73 gears - With our basic system and our methanol injection system. Car drives like stock, gets about 30 mpg, goes about 200 mph, and runs 11's at very high elevation. Whole setup is only $3500. You can get up Saturday morning, put it on, and drive to lunch with way more streetable power than you can imagine.

That is my 2 cents. Actually, now that I have read it again it sounded more like about 6 cents.

Good Luck with your project, Rick @ STS



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 PM.