Turbo 1 5/8" vs. 1 3/4" primaries
Turbo 1 5/8" vs. 1 3/4" primaries
Just wondering what everyone thinks about header primaries when constructing turbo headers. I see a couple people use 1 3/4", but then in HotRod last month there was a 1000 hp Mustang using 1 5/8" primaries. Does the smaller size help increase exhaust gas velocity, and not hurt top end, or is it pretty much a cubic inch thing. I believe the mustang was only 306 cu.in, would 1 5/8" primaries be too small for a 350 or 383
Guess it would depend on your goals and your choice of parts. For a 350, you could probably get by with 1 5/8" primaries, but for 383+ I would be looking at 1 3/4". I'm planning to use 1 7/8" primaries for my twin turbo project, after I finish paying for Christmas. So, header contruction should begin in June, maybe.
Originally posted by jnjspdshop
See if you use Mild steel you could be done and driving your car by June
See if you use Mild steel you could be done and driving your car by June
See if you use Mild steel you could be done and driving your car by June
Plus I have to keep my 97 running so I can get back and forth to work (and I really want a new SQ trim, my V1 is too noisy). All the above mentioned work is for my 87 GTA. I'll make a new sig then with stock parts listed.
I'll have 1-5/8" primaries into a 2-1/2" MAX log. This is on a 383 though. Depending on the size of turbos you're running, I'd bump the size up a little on that 427.
Are you getting the headers coated afterwards?
Are you getting the headers coated afterwards?
No, I'm planning to use 321 stainless, so they will be put into a burnishing machine to make them shine. As far as turbos go, I'm probably going to use two PT68s or something like that, haven't completely decided yet.
427 cu.in WOW... I have been thinking lately you are better off spending money on fuel system, turbos, and intercoolers, then spending money on huge cubic inches. I mean look at Buick GN's most are under 4.0 liters in displacement and some are running 9 second quarters. I think CID matters less with a turbo, than with a supercharger
keep the cubes down, (dutweiller style) and run 1-5/8".. velocity is everything, back pressure is caused by the turbine wheel/exhaust housing.
I've currently got a 427" small block but I'm knocking the stroke back to 3.5" and increasing the bore from 4.125 to 4.130.
You don't need cubes, remember, there is a replacement for displacement.
good luck!
I've currently got a 427" small block but I'm knocking the stroke back to 3.5" and increasing the bore from 4.125 to 4.130.
You don't need cubes, remember, there is a replacement for displacement.

good luck!
Sorry to hijack, but I've got one quick question for Brady:
What distributor setup did you use on that big block? Looks like it fits under the cowl just fine. Can something like that be used on a SBC?
What distributor setup did you use on that big block? Looks like it fits under the cowl just fine. Can something like that be used on a SBC?
it's the MSD crab-cap crank trigger distributor.. it's cheap and fits with plenty of clearance... you can lift the distributor and turn it 180* if you need to (don't ask how I know)..
laterz
...Brady
laterz
...Brady
FWIW This guy is a friend of mine
www.hartlineperformance.com ...... His car is a 4.5L V6 making 1000HP (That's more displacement per cylinder than a 5.7L V8) and he runs 1.5 inch primaries and a 2.25 inch crossover.
Velocity makes a big difference ...6 second Mustangs at the Orlando Streetfinals were in the 377-408 CI with 1 5/8 primaries, 2.5 inch crossover pipes, and 101-104 MM turbos.
So run 1 7/8 headers if you think you know something those guys don't, but your car will probably be faster with 1 5/8 or 1 3/4 MAX
www.hartlineperformance.com ...... His car is a 4.5L V6 making 1000HP (That's more displacement per cylinder than a 5.7L V8) and he runs 1.5 inch primaries and a 2.25 inch crossover.
Velocity makes a big difference ...6 second Mustangs at the Orlando Streetfinals were in the 377-408 CI with 1 5/8 primaries, 2.5 inch crossover pipes, and 101-104 MM turbos.
So run 1 7/8 headers if you think you know something those guys don't, but your car will probably be faster with 1 5/8 or 1 3/4 MAX
run a primary that will handle your motor "NA".
that 4.5L v6 probably runs very high boost pressure, which means higher exhaust pressures, which means he can get away with smaller tubing.
I would say 1000rwhp v8 is where you get close to the 1 5/8th or 1 3/4 gap. I would say you are still aways away from 1 7/8th territory
I plan on making 900+ rwhp with 1 5/8ths.
that 4.5L v6 probably runs very high boost pressure, which means higher exhaust pressures, which means he can get away with smaller tubing.
I would say 1000rwhp v8 is where you get close to the 1 5/8th or 1 3/4 gap. I would say you are still aways away from 1 7/8th territory

I plan on making 900+ rwhp with 1 5/8ths.
I can see using the smaller diameter pipe with a huge turbo, 100+ mm turbos take a hellacious amount of exhaust velocity to make them spool. However, with a large displacement and two smaller turbos (like 60 something mm), I don't forsee a problem with a larger exhaust primary (as always, I could be wrong). And, if there is a problem, I can always make another set of headers in a smaller diameter. Besides, a little lag on take off will probably be a good thing, don't want to completely overpower the tires now.
So Jordon, what do you consider to be 1 7/8" territory?
So Jordon, what do you consider to be 1 7/8" territory?


