Forced Induction Supercharger/Turbocharger

True or false about a engine built for a Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 03:32 PM
  #1  
ericcer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 49
From: Largo, FL
True or false about a engine built for a Turbo

I was hoping to build a 383 9:1 compression with a specific turbo cam and then add the turbo later. I hear that running the car without the turbo it will run bad or very unresponsive. Is that true?
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 04:03 PM
  #2  
5.0THIS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 971
From: Colorado
Re: True or false about a engine built for a Turbo

I know a couple of people driving around with turbo motors with no turbos..... the cam in a turbo is fairly mild in nature, when it comes to LSA, and the only other factor would be comp. ratio. I dont see the motor being optomized, but I dont see it running especially bad around town
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 04:21 PM
  #3  
Josh-'04 GTO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,697
From: Petersham, MA
Re: True or false about a engine built for a Turbo

Yeah, it should drive around very similar to stock.
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 06:14 PM
  #4  
ericcer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 49
From: Largo, FL
Re: True or false about a engine built for a Turbo

One of the guys at Cam Motion thought it would run like do-do. They gave me these specs for my build up.

Duration (intake/exaust) 231/226
Lift (intake/exaust) 564/556
Lobe Center Separation 115
Intake Centerline 113
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 05:08 PM
  #5  
engineermike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Re: True or false about a engine built for a Turbo

I built a supercharger motor once and ran it for a while with no blower. It was an 8.4/1 compression 355, but it ran 11.96 at 114 all motor on poo gas.

I'm not quite sure why people insist on using and obeying Cam Motion's recommendations. You really ought to see their shop. They have no R&D equipment at all. No spin-master. No dyno. Their cam-doctor is on a temperary fold-up table. Sure, some Pro-Stock guys use them, but the Pro-Stockers design their own cams and just get Cam Motion to manufacture it. They really aren't nearly as advanced as Comp or even Crane.

Mike
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 05:46 PM
  #6  
Brady's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 472
From: Mobile, Alabama
Re: True or false about a engine built for a Turbo

Terry at Cam Motion told me they grind one off cams for the companies you mentioned.. Cam Motion is also in the winners circle after most races, that's why I went with them.
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 06:16 PM
  #7  
Josh-'04 GTO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,697
From: Petersham, MA
Re: True or false about a engine built for a Turbo

Originally Posted by Brady_96Z
Terry at Cam Motion told me they grind one off cams for the companies you mentioned.. Cam Motion is also in the winners circle after most races, that's why I went with them.
I'm sure that an employee of Cam Motion would tell you whatever it takes to get you to buy from them. That statement would mean much more if it came from a third party that is in the know. In addition, if they didn't do the R&D, then they are not truly in touch with the technology involved. Cams...they're not just "bumpsticks" anymore!
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 06:17 PM
  #8  
ericcer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 49
From: Largo, FL
Re: True or false about a engine built for a Turbo

Originally Posted by engineermike
I built a supercharger motor once and ran it for a while with no blower. It was an 8.4/1 compression 355, but it ran 11.96 at 114 all motor on poo gas.

I'm not quite sure why people insist on using and obeying Cam Motion's recommendations. You really ought to see their shop. They have no R&D equipment at all. No spin-master. No dyno. Their cam-doctor is on a temperary fold-up table. Sure, some Pro-Stock guys use them, but the Pro-Stockers design their own cams and just get Cam Motion to manufacture it. They really aren't nearly as advanced as Comp or even Crane.

Mike
I noticed that here people thought they were good. Is there a concern about quality or something? Just because the company is not big doesn't mean they aren't knowledgable.

Who else do you recommend for a custom grind?
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 06:21 PM
  #9  
engineermike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Re: True or false about a engine built for a Turbo

Terry also told me that 224 at .050" with .378" lobe lift is impossible (Comp lobe #3192).

They grind one-off cams for local engine shops also. The local shop will typically send them a grind they know works, but is damaged, and Cam Motion will copy it.

Mike
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 06:49 PM
  #10  
engineermike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Re: True or false about a engine built for a Turbo

Originally Posted by ericcer
Is there a concern about quality or something? Just because the company is not big doesn't mean they aren't knowledgable.

Who else do you recommend for a custom grind?
Since they are small, they don't have access to the technology and tools it takes to make the latest and greatest cam grinds.

To get a great custom grind, you have to go to an engine builder who is an expert in his field. Thunder Racing has had dozens, if not hundreds of different LS1 cams on the dyno. For a NA LS1 cam, go to Thunder. Duttweiller has had hundreds of turbo cams on the dyno. For a turbo cam, go to Duttweiller. It will cost extra, but you're paying for their R&D/dyno time.

And speaking of Thunder, they are located about 15 miles from Cam Motion. Who grinds Thunder's cams? Not Cam Motion.

Mike
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F'n1996Z28SS
Cars For Sale
8
Aug 23, 2023 11:19 PM
D1SC383LT4
Parts For Sale
1
Jan 26, 2015 01:41 PM
bzeilstr
Car Audio and Electronics
1
Sep 7, 2002 11:10 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02 AM.