thought id show you lt1 guys the potential of ls1's lol
the first graph is corrected and the second is uncorrected! pisc1 on 13.5#'s of boost.

 

bah 550 ftlbs i can make that on a stock bottom end lt1 j/k

nice numbers

 

You could and I have.

There is nothing wrong with the OPs numbers,,, but nothing to justify a stab at lt1s.

Ill take 600# at 3k rpms for a street car any day over 550 at 5.5

 

maybe i should add some nitrous to show you guys the numbers on that. since thats the only way i can see an lt1 putting out that much tq at such a low rpm.

 

I can't help it if stuperchargers have lag.

 

Nice #'s! I assume you were joking about the lt1 comment. Peak tq @3000rpm is low and tough to do without juice, but 4k is doable.

http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=736153

check this thread out.

 

but u were talking about nitrous right. im planning on adding nitrous or alky injection in the future. im not sure which one yet.

 

What's your point here???

 

I haven't run nitrous in quite a while.

Granted I dont have any graphs yet, I have no problems making 10psi by 2k.... so I bet I can get it to peak by 3.

 

hmmmm I have a Dyno graph for this LSjuan.....

I like how the 2 graphs have different corrections also nice touch :P

 

 

looks like the same run to me.... just SAE and uncorrected...


so 680 rwhp out of a built short block LS1 with a blower?.......

 

Thats pretty rediculous at 3k...mine makes 600 ft-lbs @ 4025

Nice numbers East

 

eastoaklandss, my LT1 is proving better than your LS1 according to my calculations...

on 7psi my LT1 makes 570rwhp SAE Corrected (dynoed today). 570 + 15% = 655hp engine. Base is ~450hp.
On 14psi it should make 2x 450hp = 900hp - 15% = 765rwhp calc.

To make that clear... LT1 = 765rwhp vs LS1 = 680rwhp.

Had the car for 10yrs, $20K total investment including tires and oil.
$ for $ the LT1 smokes your LS1's ***. I'm playing friendly by the way, please excuse my competiveness.

I just went to dyno today havent figured out how to post my graph.

 

True, but your also running a stroker where as he's not. I'd also be willing to bet that you won't pick up another 195rwhp with 7 more psi. Not ******* here, but slap a pulley on that thing and bring back some more numbers....

Ken R.