Forced Induction Supercharger/Turbocharger

Ls1 cranks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 07:41 PM
  #1  
RawAzzLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 19
Ls1 cranks

whats the Highest documented HP for the stiock ls1 crank?
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 08:22 PM
  #2  
lethal93ta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 603
From: Bethel Pa.
not sure of the highest but I know a guy that has a mid 10 sec car on the stock bottom end that takes around 700 HP his car was like 3400 lbs, that was heads/cam LT headers, and a 300 shot of N20
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 08:23 PM
  #3  
Mikael's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 407
From: Tacoma, WA
I forget who it was, but 750ft/lbs has been seen.
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 10:02 AM
  #4  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 659
From: Chicago, IL
~700rwhp on a Dynojet.

But I think the crank will take 800rwhp and hopefully I can demonstrate that with my car.
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 10:50 AM
  #5  
RawAzzLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 19
Originally posted by Pro Stock John
~700rwhp on a Dynojet.

But I think the crank will take 800rwhp and hopefully I can demonstrate that with my car.
Ok you are now officially the guniea pig.
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 11:22 AM
  #6  
turb0racing's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 137
From: NY long island
Stock cranks usualy can take a brutal mid rpm turbo or SC beating. Its the pistons and rods that are the weak points.
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 05:14 PM
  #7  
RawAzzLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 19
Originally posted by turb0racing
Stock cranks usualy can take a brutal mid rpm turbo or SC beating. Its the pistons and rods that are the weak points.
I know, those are automatically being swapped for Billet rods and forged pistons, Im just not too enthused about buying a new crank i would love to see pro stock johns crank hold up to 800 foot lbs, go for it bro
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 10:10 AM
  #8  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 659
From: Chicago, IL
Harlan also did 700rwhp on an Eddy current dyno, which is probably more like 750rwhp... Stock crank.
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 10:21 AM
  #9  
RawAzzLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 19
Originally posted by Pro Stock John
Harlan also did 700rwhp on an Eddy current dyno, which is probably more like 750rwhp... Stock crank.
I know about that, but he fell of the face of the earth, havent heard anything new with Steve. btw how often does his crank see those power levels?
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 10:24 AM
  #10  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 659
From: Chicago, IL
Steve?

Matt Harlan is changing a few things, he will be at Thunder. Me too.
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 10:26 AM
  #11  
RawAzzLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 19
Originally posted by Pro Stock John
Steve?

Matt Harlan is changing a few things, he will be at Thunder. Me too.

who has the TT firehawk, that raced the bikes? wasnt it steve harlan? anyway, does it have more than 750rwhp yet?
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 10:32 AM
  #12  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 659
From: Chicago, IL
MATT Harlan, TT Firehawk that raced that bike in that vid.

Does he have 750rwhp (dynojet right now)... Maybe.
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 10:37 AM
  #13  
RawAzzLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 19
Think he will make it to 800rwhp and have it stay together?
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 10:42 AM
  #14  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 659
From: Chicago, IL
Do I think so? Yes.

I hope to hit the same number with a supercharger.

I have pretty much the same longblock setup as him. That was intentional on my part since I wanted to have the ability to compare similar cars with different FI setups.
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 10:43 AM
  #15  
RawAzzLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 19
what EMS will u both be using?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 AM.