Forced Induction Supercharger/Turbocharger

GM pm rods? or standard rods?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 12:39 AM
  #1  
Osmosis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 218
From: Seattle
GM pm rods? or standard rods?

3 yrs ago, had my engine rebuilt. The crank broke behind the timming chain on the snout I had just over 10k on the engine in this time, so its not uder warranty. I just purchased an eagle crank 4340. Now here's my question. On the dyno, I had just under 300rwhp. I have a paxton sn2000 that i get 8spi out of. Now, I also have a nos kit for anticipation of a 50 -75 shot. I was told my engine had the hi performance chevy rods. The rods are thicker on one side that the other, but I have no way of knowing how to ID the hiperfomrance rods (which I think are the pm rods) as compaared to the standard sbc rods. The rods do not have ARP bolts and I question the integrity of the person who built my engine???? If I do use these rods again, I will be using arp bolts!

So can you guys help me out so I can identify which rods I acutally have adn if they are safe to sustain up to 375-400rwhp.

I have been trying to post pics but can't figure it out? here is a link on thirdgen with pics

http://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/show...4&goto=newpost
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 02:21 AM
  #2  
Rodrigues's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,842
From: Bloomfield Hills MI
Re: GM pm rods? or standard rods?

I would eliminate the risk factor in this situation and invest in some inexpensive rods like eagles H beams. Its just not really a part of the motor where you want to skimp on if your looking to go anywhere but stock.
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 03:29 AM
  #3  
97WS6SCharged's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,784
From: Jacksonville
Re: GM pm rods? or standard rods?

I agree with Rodrigues. At the very least, a set of bushed Scat I beams can be had for around $200 dollars and they can take 400 rwhp with relative ease. Don't scrimp on the bolts though, since they hold everything together. Just out of curiosity, what kind of combo were you running? 290rwhp with a blower seems kinda low.
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 04:50 AM
  #4  
SMOKNZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 1,178
From: Cleveland, WI
Re: GM pm rods? or standard rods?

Originally Posted by 97WS6SCharged
290rwhp with a blower seems kinda low.
I agree, unless it's a V6. I ran my PM rods up to 540 Hp with ARP bolts FWIW. I now have Eagle Hbeams
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 05:03 AM
  #5  
97WS6SCharged's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,784
From: Jacksonville
Re: GM pm rods? or standard rods?

Yeah, his sig on the 3rd gen board says it's a 91Z with a 350, but I was wondering what kind of heads and intake and other whatnots he was running.
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 10:40 AM
  #6  
Osmosis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 218
From: Seattle
Re: GM pm rods? or standard rods?

The low hp is a LONG STORY! This my explain the hp story but that for now is not the issue at hand. http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=41102 I do have AFR 190 heads, LPE 213 cam recenlty changed from the zz3 in hopes to change the low hp..did not work

What is, Need to know what rods i have and if these will be strong enough?
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 12:14 PM
  #7  
Flip94ta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 610
From: Akron, OH.
Re: GM pm rods? or standard rods?

I dont know what rods you have but PM rods with arp bolts will handle the power (375-400) you are talking about.
Old Mar 22, 2005 | 01:19 AM
  #8  
breakmyfootoff's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,066
From: Odessa/Lubbock, Texas
Re: GM pm rods? or standard rods?

They look like the PM rods to me, if you want to know for sure take one of the end caps off and look at the surface where the end cap mates to the main body of the rod. On PM rods this area will be kinda rough looking (not machined). Rods are cast (or forged, depending on the rod) and then cut apart to make the 2 peices, except the PM rods which are cast and then they break them. I'm not sure what process they use to break them but that is how it's done. The two peices fit together perfectly and do not have a machined finish. Also, the lack of a balancing pad is also an indication of PM rods as all PM rods are cast to be within a certain wieght and are therefore "balanced". The balancing pad is an excess amount of metal that is usually cast into the rod cap, this extra metal is put there so that the rods can be matched by removing a small amount of metal from the balancing pads. Usually, all the rods are wieghed to find the lightest one, then a tiny bit of metal is ground from each balance pad of all the heavier rods to bring them as close as possible to the same wieght as that lightest one making them all equal. This is not necessary with the PM rods as they are all approx. the same wieght as cast, that is why they dont have the balancing pad on the bottom, it's not necessary.

Last edited by breakmyfootoff; Mar 22, 2005 at 01:31 AM.
Old Mar 22, 2005 | 02:14 PM
  #9  
onlyone07's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 207
From: Jacksonville, FL
Re: GM pm rods? or standard rods?

My opinion on Paxton blowers other than the Novi 1000/2000 is that they suck. I had a 92 Mustang with a 351W and 5psi from an SN2000 and ran a best of 12.8 @ 109.5. I pulled the blower off and sprayed the car with a 175 shot after that and ran 12.3 @ 114.

Now, before I tore this motor apart to stroke it(I bought the car with the blower on it), I noticed it had the wrong computer. But the Paxton's suck in general. Thats my opinion.

Wade

Last edited by onlyone07; Mar 22, 2005 at 02:24 PM.
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 05:28 PM
  #10  
Osmosis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 218
From: Seattle
Re: GM pm rods? or standard rods?

Well, first of all, I never asked your "Opinion" on the blower. Second of all, I get great results with my sucky paxton, ran a 12.9 @111mph on a stock engine, capable of more if I were to put some slicks on. Second, i had considered going with a procharger as my buddy did, but I can not justify spending 3500 more on a new charger. Especially since I paid 3g's for this unit in 98. It cost me only 200 bucks to rebuild my sn2000, I get a consistant 9psi out of it, It's MOUSE QUIET in contrast with my buddies that has the procharger. Don't get me wrong, his car sounds awsome, but I can hear him 2 blocks away! And he and his wife have a lot of extra $$$ His car is a bit faster than mine and we run the same boost levels (9psi). He runs 12.5-12.6's. I run 12.9. Now, I don't have a ****ing money tree outside in my back yard, but by cost comparision, It's been a pretty decent blower if you take the time to understand the limitations of the sn series and know how to rebuild them when it's necessary. What I've found is that knowing the limiting factor of these blowers is essential for dependable operation. Heat kills them, get a large oil cooler, spinning them over 38K rpm's will wear them out fast. If I could do it all over again, I would have purchased a procharger, but then again, I think they were just coming available when I purchased my blower.

Last edited by Osmosis; Mar 24, 2005 at 08:13 PM.
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 06:15 PM
  #11  
onlyone07's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 207
From: Jacksonville, FL
Re: GM pm rods? or standard rods?

Calm down, buddy. Don't get offended because of my opinion's. I was just making a comment about the blower and your HP level. I'm glad that your happy with your Paxton. I was just sharing my own personal experience.

I know you were asking about rods, but others started asking about the blower, so I shared my story. Apparently I struck(sp) a nerve. Don't take things so seriously over the net.
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 06:33 PM
  #12  
Osmosis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 218
From: Seattle
Re: GM pm rods? or standard rods?

Well, like I said, I didn't ask for your opinion on the blower, then you come on this thread and tell me what a crappy blower I have That just is not cool. In my boat, price comparative, I get great results from it. I'm not willing to spend another 3500$ for .3 faster in the 1/4 for a procharger. Yet, If I could do it all over again, HE11 yes, I would have purchased an ATI. But my blower is easy to rebuild, 200 bucks a crack, and quiet as a mouse. I do have some giggle gas I'm going to throw on it once I build a 9inch rear end. Anyways, back to the subject, your opinion is just that, but I did not ask for your opinion of my blower. you just jump on this thread bashing my blower saying it sucks. I'm sorry you had such a bad experience with paxton, I could have too, but I learned how they work and learned what thier limitations are. It would be awsome to get an ATI pushing 20psi!
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 06:49 PM
  #13  
onlyone07's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 207
From: Jacksonville, FL
Re: GM pm rods? or standard rods?

Originally Posted by Osmosis
Well, like I said, I didn't ask for your opinion on the blower, then you come on this thread and tell me what a crappy blower I have That just is not cool.
Take what you read on the internet with a grain of salt. Don't be a baby because someone you've never met, never will meet, or probably never speak to, had a negative comment about your blower.

In my boat, price comparative, I get great results from it. I'm not willing to spend another 3500$ for .3 faster in the 1/4 for a procharger. Yet, If I could do it all over again, HE11 yes, I would have purchased an ATI. But my blower is easy to rebuild, 200 bucks a crack, and quiet as a mouse.
Sounds like you, yourself, aren't satisfied with the performance if you wished you had bought the ATI.

Anyways, back to the subject, your opinion is just that, but I did not ask for your opinion of my blower.
I never said it was anything more. Opinion's are like *******s, everybody has one.

you just jump on this thread bashing my blower saying it sucks. I'm sorry you had such a bad experience with paxton, I could have too, but I learned how they work and learned what thier limitations are.
I clicked on the thread because I was curious as to what was in it. As everyone else was. Others made remarks abuot your setup, I did too. You just got offended for some lame reason.

It would be awsome to get an ATI pushing 20psi!
One thing we agree on.
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 06:52 PM
  #14  
onlyone07's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 207
From: Jacksonville, FL
Re: GM pm rods? or standard rods?

On the subject at hand...I think some I-beam's would suffice.
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 08:20 PM
  #15  
Osmosis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 218
From: Seattle
Re: GM pm rods? or standard rods?

First thing, I am happy with my blower. However, If I could have purchased an ATI when I purchased my paxton, I would have because of the potential of the ATI far exceeds my paxton. I plan on using a 75shot of NOS, nothing more.

Now, If you think i was offended for some lame reason, you should consider if you put out a thread looking for some advise for rods and someone slammed your blower which you've had pretty good results with. I guess what i'm trying to say, you don't have anything nice to say, or constructive.....I hope you can figure the rest out. And the thing is if I was asking about my blower and you slammed it from your exp. that's fine, but i was asking about rods. I completely understand the limitations of my blower.


Second, I went with some eagle I beam's 5140 material.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 AM.