Forced Induction Supercharger/Turbocharger

Comp Cams tells me this cam for my setup???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 10:08 PM
  #16  
sleepybu's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 408
From: BC Canada
thanks 93formula

why not 114 lsa


Old Oct 29, 2003 | 10:12 PM
  #17  
INTMD8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 884
From: I reached back like a pimp and smacked that LS1....
The actual LSA # is insignifigant. Overlap is what needs to be considered.

A stock turbo buick cam is on a 107 LSA. But it also is 192/196 @.050 leaving it with negative 20 degrees overlap @.050.

218/218 on a 113lsa has negative 8 degrees of overlap.


My opinion on turbo cams is that overlap is not good (because at some point exhaust pressure will usually exceed intake pressure), and the way to reduce overlap and still run a decent amount of duration is to close the exhaust valve early. The cam I chose and will be installing soon is-

226 @.050 .558 lift intake

218 @.050 .542 lift exhaust

113 ICL

117 LSA
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 10:23 PM
  #18  
93formula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,929
From: vancouver, BC, Canada
interesting cam, did you select that or did a company do it for you, and why the 117 lsa?
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 10:41 PM
  #19  
cmotorsports.com's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 67
From: las vegas NV USA
There are way, way too many factors to just say things like "114 is best, or 117, or 106". Backpressure, RPM range, desired boost level, desired horsepower, A/R of turbo, location of turbo (exhaust heat as it enters housing), size of turbo, trim, head flow, cubic inches, etc. are all extremely important in determining both ICL and LSA. There is no rule of thumb with a turbo cam (or any cam really), there are just way too many variables. The only way to get the right cam is to take all of those into consideration, and only then can a cam be optimised.

As with any company, you need to talk to the right people. Call and ask for Seth or Sam. Everybody here kind of has their own specialty and those two are the turbo guys.
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 11:00 PM
  #20  
INTMD8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 884
From: I reached back like a pimp and smacked that LS1....
Originally posted by cmotorsports.com
There are way, way too many factors to just say things like "114 is best, or 117, or 106". Backpressure, RPM range, desired boost level, desired horsepower, A/R of turbo, location of turbo (exhaust heat as it enters housing), size of turbo, trim, head flow, cubic inches, etc. are all extremely important in determining both ICL and LSA. There is no rule of thumb with a turbo cam (or any cam really), there are just way too many variables. The only way to get the right cam is to take all of those into consideration, and only then can a cam be optimised.

As with any company, you need to talk to the right people. Call and ask for Seth or Sam. Everybody here kind of has their own specialty and those two are the turbo guys.

I agree.

Everyone tries to choose cams by duration, LSA, and lift, when those numbers should just be the result of the valve events chosen.
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 11:05 PM
  #21  
INTMD8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 884
From: I reached back like a pimp and smacked that LS1....
Originally posted by 93formula
interesting cam, did you select that or did a company do it for you, and why the 117 lsa?

I selected the cam.

I chose the valve events (IVO,IVC,EVO,EVC) and the duration, ICL, and LSA was the result of those numbers.

The lift was as much as I could get for that particular amount of duration.
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 06:26 AM
  #22  
engineermike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Originally posted by cmotorsports.com
. . . There is no rule of thumb with a turbo cam (or any cam really), . . .
My point exactly. You can't rule out 113 or 112 just because it's not the 114 or 115 you were expecting because there is no rule of thumb.
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 01:01 PM
  #23  
texlurch's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 702
From: Houston, TX USA
Strange. The p/n is the same one that Comp recommended to me for my twin setup, but the numbers you listed are way different than mine... (the lift is for 1.5, I run 1.6)

"(Comp Cams)
The camshaft I would run with this is a custom grind camshaft. The part
number is 07-000-8, and the grind number is LT1 3421/3314 HR112. I have included the specs to the camshaft below. Now, I cannot guarantee that this camshaft will work with pump fuel, but the key is to bleed off a little bit of cylinder pressure. The camshaft you have now is doing just that (LT4 Hot Cam). With the turbo set up that you have you could make more power with more boost, however, the camshaft is not going to do anything but bleed off the boost. The motor has too much static compression to build boost and run pump fuel with a proper
camshaft designed for a turbo application.

Thanks,
Sam@compcams

SPEC CARD
PART #: 07-000-8
ENGINE: LT1/LT4
GRIND #: LT1 3421 /3314 HR112.0
GROSS VALVE LIFT .507 .502
DURATION @ .006 TAPPET LIFT
279 275
VALVE TIMING OPEN CLOSE
@ .050 INT 2 46
EXH 44 0
SPECS FOR CAM INST. @ 112 CENTERLINE
INT EXH
DURATION @ .050 228.00 224.00
LOBE LIFT .338 .335
LOBE SEPARATION 112.0
ROCKER ARM RATIO 1.50 1.50 "

That is a 228- 224 duration, and .540 - .536 lift with 1.6 rockers.
I wonder if they messed up and gave you the wrong specs for the part number.. ?

Last edited by texlurch; Oct 30, 2003 at 01:04 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
MadMav
Parts For Sale
9
May 25, 2015 09:35 PM
carl.froehlich
LT1 Based Engine Tech
6
Mar 13, 2015 12:38 AM
Cam's maro
LT1 Based Engine Tech
1
Jan 30, 2015 09:21 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44 PM.