Forced Induction Supercharger/Turbocharger

383 or 355?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2005 | 11:14 PM
  #1  
blown94's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,228
From: Florida
383 or 355?

Wondering if the difference between a 383 and a 355 is going to be that huge, or am I just better off spending the extra money saved by giong 355 on a really good set of heads? Plans are to supercharge, and some nitrous, maybe a 100 shot or so. I have a powerdyne kit, 4.5 psi, but ive got a 6 psi pulley, and a 7" crank pulley, which by may calculations should put out about 7.5 psi. and just about max out the small unit. I already own the powerdyne, so its a limiting factor as of now. If I go 383, I have read it may impose a restriction since its a small s/c. Basically, im aiming for around 450-500 RWHP and I want it to be street friendly and able to drive to events in other states. I have an opportunity to buy a 383 kit for $750 but I need more details on it as I think it has hyper pistons and they would need replaced with forged,but its complete flywheel to balancer. Is it worth the extra $$ ill be spending to go 383 or is it not a good idea for my goals and would I be better off 355?
Old May 24, 2005 | 12:49 AM
  #2  
96m6lt1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,130
From: las vegas
Re: 383 or 355?

i would go 355
Old May 24, 2005 | 01:33 PM
  #3  
engineermike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Re: 383 or 355?

I would do a 383 but seriously consider going with a different supercharger.
Old May 25, 2005 | 08:56 PM
  #4  
blown94's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,228
From: Florida
Re: 383 or 355?

a bigger s/c is even more $$, plus the pistons, plus block work, im sure it wont get as good of fuel mileage, which defeats most of my goals for the project. I already own the powerdyne. I want this thing to be streetable to drive between states, maybe FL to NY. I dont wanna spend another $5k more building more than what im looking for especially since I want to go with a nice set of heads like afr 210's or so. Then we all know how you end up building the rest of the car around the engine because the chassis cant handle the power. Streetable and reliable are my goals, while maintaining the best fuel mileage possible. It can be done, you just need to make a plan and stick to it buildwise. Im leaning more towards the 355 right now.
Old May 26, 2005 | 05:24 PM
  #5  
Sneakin Deacon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 501
Re: 383 or 355?

mildly ported stock casting heads, appropriate cam, on a 355 would be my suggestion, as the cheapest possible thing to put together. not to firmiliar with the powerdyne units, but stock lt1 longblock and 7psi on an s-trim with just longtubes (dumping, probably could see more power with an X-pipe) has netted me 400whp through a 9" and 28" slicks. 450 to the wheels would be a forged bottom end and a pulley change away.
Old May 26, 2005 | 05:29 PM
  #6  
engineermike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Re: 383 or 355?

Originally Posted by blown94
Streetable and reliable are my goals.
For that, a 383 would be better because it would make the power at a lower rpm with less boost.
Old May 27, 2005 | 09:22 AM
  #7  
Turbo6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 368
From: Indianapolis, IN
Re: 383 or 355?

If you are sticking with the powerdyne, or if you only see yourself upgrading to maybe an S-trim or something equivalent in the future, I'd go 355, stock crank, forged pistons, eagle H-beam rods.

I would not spend all the money on some AFR 210's for this combo. The blower won't feed the heads and you don't need this aggressive of a head for the combo you are planning. I'd just get a nice set of Lloyd Eliott or equivalent stage 2 heads, mild streetable blower cam (around 218/230 or equivalent at .050"), and you will make great power for the minimal amount of investment. No extra block clearancing, no new oil pan or hammering on the old one to make it fit, cheaper heads that will flow close to what the AFR 210's do in the lift range that you will be running (since you won't be running a solid roller with .600"+ lift. That's the way I would build it...and in the future if you want a little more boost and performance, go up to an S-trim and the setup is still optimal for that.

I used to have that same powerdyne kit on my LT1 before the current car and I'm pretty familiar with it's capabilities and that is how I would build it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Z Power
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
Sep 19, 2015 11:19 PM
cristian1311
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
2
Sep 12, 2015 08:16 PM
95craz28
Fuel and Ignition
11
Sep 12, 2015 07:47 AM
smoknta
Cars For Sale
1
Aug 27, 2015 05:07 PM
alphaauto
Cars For Sale
0
Jul 26, 2015 04:40 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:05 PM.