Drivetrain Clutch, Torque Converter, Transmission, Driveline, Axles, Rear Ends

Ford 9" vs Dana 60 vs GM 12 Bolt - Rear Axle Comparisons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 12:45 PM
  #1  
97 6SPEED Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 857
From: Washington, Michigan USA
Talking Ford 9" vs Dana 60 vs GM 12 Bolt - Rear Axle Comparisons

Great article in the June 2008 issue of Car Craft, (See Page 40), on the subject rear axles. Just FYI
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 01:12 PM
  #2  
onebadponcho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 954
From: Shelton, WA
Wow, it's the middle of April and the June issue is out already? Since I recently ordered a 9", I'll have to check it out.
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 10:22 AM
  #3  
97 6SPEED Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 857
From: Washington, Michigan USA
Thumbs up

Yep, don't know what's currently "on the newsstands" but us subscribers definitely have the June 2008 issue of Car Craft, already in hand.

This article makes great reading for anyone considering an axle "upgrade".
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 10:38 AM
  #4  
onebadponcho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 954
From: Shelton, WA
Yeah, it is in fact out on newsstands. I skimmed through it.....makes me even happier I'll be getting a 9" that weighs the same as a 10 bolt. No gains in unsprung weight for me.
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 11:40 AM
  #5  
97 6SPEED Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 857
From: Washington, Michigan USA
Question

Originally Posted by onebadponcho
Yeah, it is in fact out on newsstands. I skimmed through it.....makes me even happier I'll be getting a 9" that weighs the same as a 10 bolt. No gains in unsprung weight for me.
You mean compared to a 12 bolt, right?

Our stock 10 bolts, have got to be at least 30 - 40 pounds lighter than any 9" inch.

Last edited by 97 6SPEED Z; Apr 17, 2008 at 11:43 AM.
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 01:37 PM
  #6  
onebadponcho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 954
From: Shelton, WA
Originally Posted by 97 6SPEED Z
You mean compared to a 12 bolt, right?

Our stock 10 bolts, have got to be at least 30 - 40 pounds lighter than any 9" inch.
Nope. That's not the case for a fabricated 9" rear.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 10:04 PM
  #7  
Bersaglieri's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,907
From: The Wild West
Wish I could see, although I already have a 9" and feel pretty confident about it. My Cummins has a Dana 60 up front

-Dustin-
Old May 5, 2008 | 10:34 PM
  #8  
ponyackn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 990
From: Sac to SoCal
Originally Posted by onebadponcho
Nope. That's not the case for a fabricated 9" rear.
Who makes this fabbed rear that you are talking about? Is it the one from Midwest Chassis?
Old May 6, 2008 | 12:51 PM
  #9  
wrd1972's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
Originally Posted by ponyackn
Who makes this fabbed rear that you are talking about? Is it the one from Midwest Chassis?
Here is the Midwest. If you go with the aluminum gear case it will be lighter than the 10 bolt.


Old May 7, 2008 | 12:09 AM
  #10  
ponyackn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 990
From: Sac to SoCal
Wow, might be time to sell my 12 bolt. Thanks for the good pics.
Old May 7, 2008 | 09:01 AM
  #11  
wrd1972's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
There is even a chromeoly torque arm and tunnel brace that are not shown in the pics. Looks very similar to the M9. But a lot cheaper.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
maybe2fast
Parts For Sale
11
Mar 16, 2015 09:45 AM
ddr698
Parts For Sale
2
Jan 9, 2015 10:05 AM
4586
Parts For Sale
2
Jan 3, 2015 07:22 PM
nodnarb481
Middle Atlantic
0
Jan 1, 2015 11:43 PM
rockync7
Cars For Sale
0
Jan 1, 2015 05:10 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 AM.