wondering what M6 stock lt1 cars run in the 1/4. . . . . .
#32
That's a very rare occurance. Even for today.
#33
Umm.. I live in Dallas. The DA here is only negative during the winter. Speaking of which a buddy of mine just ran in -1300 DA outside of Detroit, so Michigan has decent weather too... I made the trek to HRP once, but it was so humid the track got moist after the sun went down. I didn't run any faster than I do locally, but I did see the first M6 and A4 H/C LS1 cars <- back then it wassaid that they couldn't run 12's with just heads/cam.
But anyways. 12's in a barely modded LT1 6-speed are so 10 years ago.
Jordon Musser and I both had 12 second bolt on LT1's, complete with the factory 3.42 rear end, and weighing 3560 lbs. Sorry you don't believe it.
But it can be done.
Now I'm continuing to make disbelievers w/ my 12.2 second "Cam only" SUV .
But anyways. 12's in a barely modded LT1 6-speed are so 10 years ago.
Jordon Musser and I both had 12 second bolt on LT1's, complete with the factory 3.42 rear end, and weighing 3560 lbs. Sorry you don't believe it.
But it can be done.
Now I'm continuing to make disbelievers w/ my 12.2 second "Cam only" SUV .
#34
From what I remember, you were running 10.9's and hanging with cars that seemed to have far more done to them at the time
#35
#36
haha, sorry about that... I got the issue a couple years after it actually debuted... a friend gave it to me after I converted my 3.4L to an LT1 car. Which car were you driving? I can't find the issue right now but I know I still have it. As I remember it, there were only 2 LT1's, Shawns and Tonys. Were you driving a different car back then or is my memory a little fuzzy?
#37
There's a generally accepted definition of "bolt-ons". It does not mean that the parts are attached using bolts. Some people like to stretch the definition that way (like you're doing), but that's not what it means. Superchargers are attached using bolts. Hell, pretty much everything involves bolts. Not all of them are bolt ons.
Bolt-ons are engine modifications that don't require removing the valve covers or the oil pan, with the exception of power adders (nitrous, turbocharger, or supercharger). Examples:
* underdrive pulleys
* electric water pump
* cold air intake
* intake manifold
* exhaust
* throttle body
* MAF
* thermostat
That's what everyone in this thread is talking about, except for you. You can go on yammering about how all of your stuff is bolted on; it's still not what we're trying to discuss.
Okay? Good.
Bolt-ons are engine modifications that don't require removing the valve covers or the oil pan, with the exception of power adders (nitrous, turbocharger, or supercharger). Examples:
* underdrive pulleys
* electric water pump
* cold air intake
* intake manifold
* exhaust
* throttle body
* MAF
* thermostat
That's what everyone in this thread is talking about, except for you. You can go on yammering about how all of your stuff is bolted on; it's still not what we're trying to discuss.
Okay? Good.
#38
There's a generally accepted definition of "bolt-ons". It does not mean that the parts are attached using bolts. Some people like to stretch the definition that way (like you're doing), but that's not what it means. Superchargers are attached using bolts. Hell, pretty much everything involves bolts. Not all of them are bolt ons.
Bolt-ons are engine modifications that don't require removing the valve covers or the oil pan, with the exception of power adders (nitrous, turbocharger, or supercharger). Examples:
* underdrive pulleys
* electric water pump
* cold air intake
* intake manifold
* exhaust
* throttle body
* MAF
* thermostat
That's what everyone in this thread is talking about, except for you. You can go on yammering about how all of your stuff is bolted on; it's still not what we're trying to discuss.
Okay? Good.
Bolt-ons are engine modifications that don't require removing the valve covers or the oil pan, with the exception of power adders (nitrous, turbocharger, or supercharger). Examples:
* underdrive pulleys
* electric water pump
* cold air intake
* intake manifold
* exhaust
* throttle body
* MAF
* thermostat
That's what everyone in this thread is talking about, except for you. You can go on yammering about how all of your stuff is bolted on; it's still not what we're trying to discuss.
Okay? Good.
So, I guess that your higher hp, slower time producing, sig cars are a better route to go than my suggestion to the fella. Bolt-ons that work, are a smarter path. I'm not yammering about just my car. Bolt-ons that WORK, would be the best suggestion for the op. Check some of the signatures of the guys. I'm way under 300hp and lifting a wheel and running 12's. Okay? Good!
#39
One of my pics from the magazine is my avatar.
#40
So, I guess that your higher hp, slower time producing, sig cars are a better route to go than my suggestion to the fella. Bolt-ons that work, are a smarter path. I'm not yammering about just my car. Bolt-ons that WORK, would be the best suggestion for the op. Check some of the signatures of the guys. I'm way under 300hp and lifting a wheel and running 12's. Okay? Good!
Modifications that work are indeed a smarter path. My point is only that the modifications you're recommending don't fit the traditional definition of "bolt-ons."
This whole conversation began with this post:
So, we all agree, except that you (3DFORMULA) are the only one that considers a complete rear end swap and full suspension to be "bolt-ons".
#41
Modifications that work are indeed a smarter path. My point is only that the modifications you're recommending don't fit the traditional definition of "bolt-ons."
And what you're recommending is more or less exactly what he said would be necessary (except that instead of brutal disregard, you're just replacing the 10-bolt and clutch).
So, we all agree, except that you (3DFORMULA) are the only one that considers a complete rear end swap and full suspension to be "bolt-ons".
And what you're recommending is more or less exactly what he said would be necessary (except that instead of brutal disregard, you're just replacing the 10-bolt and clutch).
So, we all agree, except that you (3DFORMULA) are the only one that considers a complete rear end swap and full suspension to be "bolt-ons".
Last edited by 3DFORMULA; 04-20-2009 at 03:41 PM.
#42
And really all that I'm saying, and have done as example, is replace the parts that cannot handle the brutal abuse of the drag strip for a quick timeslip on a stock motor. And it realistly is just a matter of some bolt-ons. Some of ya may not consider this a traditional definition of "bolt-ons" however, I have only bolted a few parts on the car and kept my dependability, daily driver duties, fuel economy(26mpg highway), A/C, tunes, completely comfortable 2 seater, and still managed a great timeslip for a no horsepower added, 144,000 mile LT1 F-body. If it is a timeslip improvement somebody is asking for I just like to help let them see that it is not just adding horsepower that is necessary.
#43
Yeah, but adding HP is where it counts on the street. Your big old 12 bolt, suspension and whatnot arn't going to help your stock LT1 motor from getting its *** handed to it in a rollrace or highway merge. I can't belive someone would invest so much money into their car, yet not even put headers on the old LT1 - by far the best bang for buck bolt on to date for the LT1.
The OP asked "What kinda times do you run?" That can only be answered by a timeslip, which is provided from a dragstrip pass. Drag racing on the street is a STUPID, IMMATURE, DANGEROUS, ILLEGAL, and FOOLISH thing done by those who don't deserve a license. It is a priviledge to drive around my children who drive on these streets legally. Grow up boy!
However, you are correct. My bolt-ons would NOT assist in a roll race, which is NOT dragracing. So one would have to identify what it is they want to do with there car to get the correct set-up for there peticular playing.
Last edited by 3DFORMULA; 04-21-2009 at 09:38 AM.
#44
and yes, I did appreciate the mods list .. kickin' *** and takin' names with a good ole LT1
that's kinda what I'm trying to do at the moment
#45
haha, sorry about that... I got the issue a couple years after it actually debuted... a friend gave it to me after I converted my 3.4L to an LT1 car. Which car were you driving? I can't find the issue right now but I know I still have it. As I remember it, there were only 2 LT1's, Shawns and Tonys. Were you driving a different car back then or is my memory a little fuzzy?
http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...e/results.html