Drag Racing Technique Improve your track times

wondering what M6 stock lt1 cars run in the 1/4. . . . . .

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-14-2009, 09:15 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
3DFORMULA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bartonville, Ill
Posts: 309
Removing bolts to change the rearend is what then? The op ask for bolt-on help to go fast, I have provided some intelligence on bolt-ons that actually work. Now I'll show off.

Name:  P4221016.jpg
Views: 38
Size:  77.4 KB
3DFORMULA is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 07:07 AM
  #32  
Registered User
 
95firehawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Brighton, IL
Posts: 694
Originally Posted by McLovin
Dont hate due to the fact you didnt get a good motor from the factory. Some LT1's ran real strong from the factory, most ran like poop.
There's a Kills section post if I ever saw one.

Originally Posted by McLovin
Last time I checked the fastest t-56 f-body is LT1 powered.... That said, wow @ your poor modding choices. HPP and air-foil should never be on anyones mods list..........
Air foil was on the car when I bought it (as well as the K&N.) I bought the HPP to up the rev limiter. Didn't install the Powertune . It netted me an instant 4 tenths as well as 4 mph by not having to shift into third. Hmm...poor modding choices.

Originally Posted by Shawn 97 Z28 M6

But anyways. 12's in a barely modded LT1 6-speed are so 10 years ago.

Jordon Musser and I both had 12 second bolt on LT1's, complete with the factory 3.42 rear end, and weighing 3560 lbs. Sorry you don't believe it.
That's a very rare occurance. Even for today.
95firehawk is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 09:25 AM
  #33  
Moderator
 
AL SS590 M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1998
Location: Charlotte,MI USA
Posts: 6,249
Originally Posted by Shawn 97 Z28 M6
Umm.. I live in Dallas. The DA here is only negative during the winter. Speaking of which a buddy of mine just ran in -1300 DA outside of Detroit, so Michigan has decent weather too... I made the trek to HRP once, but it was so humid the track got moist after the sun went down. I didn't run any faster than I do locally, but I did see the first M6 and A4 H/C LS1 cars <- back then it wassaid that they couldn't run 12's with just heads/cam.

But anyways. 12's in a barely modded LT1 6-speed are so 10 years ago.

Jordon Musser and I both had 12 second bolt on LT1's, complete with the factory 3.42 rear end, and weighing 3560 lbs. Sorry you don't believe it.

But it can be done.

Now I'm continuing to make disbelievers w/ my 12.2 second "Cam only" SUV .
Whoa there, where did I say that I didn't believe your times? I just said that saying that some other car somewhere else in the country has a mechanical problem because his time slip doesn't match yours is just plain wrong.
AL SS590 M6 is offline  
Old 04-16-2009, 05:18 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
bkpliskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Snow Belt, PA
Posts: 654
Originally Posted by Shawn 97 Z28 M6
w/ a cai and drag radials I ran a PB of a 13.0@106 in my 97Z28 - shifted @5200 rpms I believe. Shorty headers and an offoad y it ran 12.7's @ 109 (I think) - shifted that @ 5600 .
Was it your car that I saw in the LT1 vs LS1 nitrous shootout in GMHTP in 04 with tony s?
From what I remember, you were running 10.9's and hanging with cars that seemed to have far more done to them at the time
bkpliskin is offline  
Old 04-16-2009, 05:53 PM
  #35  
Administrator
 
TedH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Brunswick, Maine 04011
Posts: 3,667
Originally Posted by bkpliskin
Was it your car that I saw in the LT1 vs LS1 nitrous shootout in GMHTP in 04 with tony s?
From what I remember, you were running 10.9's and hanging with cars that seemed to have far more done to them at the time
Hey, I was in that issue too...
TedH is offline  
Old 04-18-2009, 07:04 AM
  #36  
Registered User
 
bkpliskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Snow Belt, PA
Posts: 654
Originally Posted by TedH
Hey, I was in that issue too...
haha, sorry about that... I got the issue a couple years after it actually debuted... a friend gave it to me after I converted my 3.4L to an LT1 car. Which car were you driving? I can't find the issue right now but I know I still have it. As I remember it, there were only 2 LT1's, Shawns and Tonys. Were you driving a different car back then or is my memory a little fuzzy?
bkpliskin is offline  
Old 04-18-2009, 08:57 AM
  #37  
Super Moderator
 
JakeRobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Okemos, MI
Posts: 9,479
Originally Posted by 3DFORMULA
Removing bolts to change the rearend is what then?
There's a generally accepted definition of "bolt-ons". It does not mean that the parts are attached using bolts. Some people like to stretch the definition that way (like you're doing), but that's not what it means. Superchargers are attached using bolts. Hell, pretty much everything involves bolts. Not all of them are bolt ons.

Bolt-ons are engine modifications that don't require removing the valve covers or the oil pan, with the exception of power adders (nitrous, turbocharger, or supercharger). Examples:

* underdrive pulleys
* electric water pump
* cold air intake
* intake manifold
* exhaust
* throttle body
* MAF
* thermostat

That's what everyone in this thread is talking about, except for you. You can go on yammering about how all of your stuff is bolted on; it's still not what we're trying to discuss.

Okay? Good.
JakeRobb is offline  
Old 04-18-2009, 10:38 AM
  #38  
Registered User
 
3DFORMULA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bartonville, Ill
Posts: 309
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
There's a generally accepted definition of "bolt-ons". It does not mean that the parts are attached using bolts. Some people like to stretch the definition that way (like you're doing), but that's not what it means. Superchargers are attached using bolts. Hell, pretty much everything involves bolts. Not all of them are bolt ons.

Bolt-ons are engine modifications that don't require removing the valve covers or the oil pan, with the exception of power adders (nitrous, turbocharger, or supercharger). Examples:

* underdrive pulleys
* electric water pump
* cold air intake
* intake manifold
* exhaust
* throttle body
* MAF
* thermostat

That's what everyone in this thread is talking about, except for you. You can go on yammering about how all of your stuff is bolted on; it's still not what we're trying to discuss.

Okay? Good.

So, I guess that your higher hp, slower time producing, sig cars are a better route to go than my suggestion to the fella. Bolt-ons that work, are a smarter path. I'm not yammering about just my car. Bolt-ons that WORK, would be the best suggestion for the op. Check some of the signatures of the guys. I'm way under 300hp and lifting a wheel and running 12's. Okay? Good!
3DFORMULA is offline  
Old 04-18-2009, 06:18 PM
  #39  
Texas Moderator (1998-2009)
 
Shawn 97 Z28 M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: DFdubya, Tx.
Posts: 1,301
Originally Posted by bkpliskin
Was it your car that I saw in the LT1 vs LS1 nitrous shootout in GMHTP in 04 with tony s?
From what I remember, you were running 10.9's and hanging with cars that seemed to have far more done to them at the time
Yes. That was mine. At least someone appreciated my "stock rusted steel driveshaft", "decarbon shocks", and all that stuff.

One of my pics from the magazine is my avatar.
Shawn 97 Z28 M6 is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 07:59 AM
  #40  
Super Moderator
 
JakeRobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Okemos, MI
Posts: 9,479
Originally Posted by 3DFORMULA
So, I guess that your higher hp, slower time producing, sig cars are a better route to go than my suggestion to the fella. Bolt-ons that work, are a smarter path. I'm not yammering about just my car. Bolt-ons that WORK, would be the best suggestion for the op. Check some of the signatures of the guys. I'm way under 300hp and lifting a wheel and running 12's. Okay? Good!
I'm not making any claims about my cars. My times are on street tires and aren't anything to brag about. If I had money to spend on making my cars faster, I'd be doing several of the mods you recommended.

Modifications that work are indeed a smarter path. My point is only that the modifications you're recommending don't fit the traditional definition of "bolt-ons."

This whole conversation began with this post:

Originally Posted by Jazsun
I can only see 12's from a bolt on LT1 if it has drag radials, some suspension, and brutal disregard for the 10bolt and clutch.
And what you're recommending is more or less exactly what he said would be necessary (except that instead of brutal disregard, you're just replacing the 10-bolt and clutch).

So, we all agree, except that you (3DFORMULA) are the only one that considers a complete rear end swap and full suspension to be "bolt-ons".
JakeRobb is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 03:38 PM
  #41  
Registered User
 
3DFORMULA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bartonville, Ill
Posts: 309
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
Modifications that work are indeed a smarter path. My point is only that the modifications you're recommending don't fit the traditional definition of "bolt-ons."


And what you're recommending is more or less exactly what he said would be necessary (except that instead of brutal disregard, you're just replacing the 10-bolt and clutch).

So, we all agree, except that you (3DFORMULA) are the only one that considers a complete rear end swap and full suspension to be "bolt-ons".
And really all that I'm saying, and have done as example, is replace the parts that cannot handle the brutal abuse of the drag strip for a quick timeslip on a stock motor. And it realistly is just a matter of some bolt-ons. Some of ya may not consider this a traditional definition of "bolt-ons" however, I have only bolted a few parts on the car and kept my dependability, daily driver duties, fuel economy(26mpg highway), A/C, tunes, completely comfortable 2 seater, and still managed a great timeslip for a no horsepower added, 144,000 mile LT1 F-body. If it is a timeslip improvement somebody is asking for I just like to help let them see that it is not just adding horsepower that is necessary.

Last edited by 3DFORMULA; 04-20-2009 at 03:41 PM.
3DFORMULA is offline  
Old 04-20-2009, 09:55 PM
  #42  
Registered User
 
Jazsun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,834
Originally Posted by 3DFORMULA
And really all that I'm saying, and have done as example, is replace the parts that cannot handle the brutal abuse of the drag strip for a quick timeslip on a stock motor. And it realistly is just a matter of some bolt-ons. Some of ya may not consider this a traditional definition of "bolt-ons" however, I have only bolted a few parts on the car and kept my dependability, daily driver duties, fuel economy(26mpg highway), A/C, tunes, completely comfortable 2 seater, and still managed a great timeslip for a no horsepower added, 144,000 mile LT1 F-body. If it is a timeslip improvement somebody is asking for I just like to help let them see that it is not just adding horsepower that is necessary.
Yeah, but adding HP is where it counts on the street. Your big old 12 bolt, suspension and whatnot arn't going to help your stock LT1 motor from getting its *** handed to it in a rollrace or highway merge. I can't belive someone would invest so much money into their car, yet not even put headers on the old LT1 - by far the best bang for buck bolt on to date for the LT1.
Jazsun is offline  
Old 04-21-2009, 09:32 AM
  #43  
Registered User
 
3DFORMULA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bartonville, Ill
Posts: 309
Originally Posted by Jazsun
Yeah, but adding HP is where it counts on the street. Your big old 12 bolt, suspension and whatnot arn't going to help your stock LT1 motor from getting its *** handed to it in a rollrace or highway merge. I can't belive someone would invest so much money into their car, yet not even put headers on the old LT1 - by far the best bang for buck bolt on to date for the LT1.

The OP asked "What kinda times do you run?" That can only be answered by a timeslip, which is provided from a dragstrip pass. Drag racing on the street is a STUPID, IMMATURE, DANGEROUS, ILLEGAL, and FOOLISH thing done by those who don't deserve a license. It is a priviledge to drive around my children who drive on these streets legally. Grow up boy!

However, you are correct. My bolt-ons would NOT assist in a roll race, which is NOT dragracing. So one would have to identify what it is they want to do with there car to get the correct set-up for there peticular playing.

Last edited by 3DFORMULA; 04-21-2009 at 09:38 AM.
3DFORMULA is offline  
Old 04-21-2009, 11:15 AM
  #44  
Registered User
 
bkpliskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Snow Belt, PA
Posts: 654
Originally Posted by Shawn 97 Z28 M6
Yes. That was mine. At least someone appreciated my "stock rusted steel driveshaft", "decarbon shocks", and all that stuff.

One of my pics from the magazine is my avatar.
That's how I knew it was you, I saw the name shawn and then remembered seeing that picture in the magazine

and yes, I did appreciate the mods list .. kickin' *** and takin' names with a good ole LT1

that's kinda what I'm trying to do at the moment
bkpliskin is offline  
Old 04-24-2009, 08:33 AM
  #45  
Administrator
 
TedH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Brunswick, Maine 04011
Posts: 3,667
Originally Posted by bkpliskin
haha, sorry about that... I got the issue a couple years after it actually debuted... a friend gave it to me after I converted my 3.4L to an LT1 car. Which car were you driving? I can't find the issue right now but I know I still have it. As I remember it, there were only 2 LT1's, Shawns and Tonys. Were you driving a different car back then or is my memory a little fuzzy?
Maybe mine was an earlier issue?

http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...e/results.html
TedH is offline  


Quick Reply: wondering what M6 stock lt1 cars run in the 1/4. . . . . .



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 PM.