Drag Racing Technique Improve your track times

Much Difference in traction?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2004, 07:08 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
hsyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 1,025
Much Difference in traction?

Hey guys my rear tires are shot right now and I'm going to order a set of Drag Radials for the rear and I cannot decide between these 2 choices:

Nitto 275/40/17
Nitto 315/35/17

Does anyone know what/if there is a difference in straightline traction between these 2? Are the 315's worth the extra $? Any input is
hsyr is offline  
Old 02-23-2004, 12:23 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Gold Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Wichita Falls, TX
Posts: 269
unless you have 11" wide rims, you want the 275/40/17 DRs. The 315s will not lay flat when mounted on a 9" rim and you will actually lose traction. There is only 1.22" differences in the tread width between the two sizes http://www.nittotire.com/popup_555r_sizes.asp
Gold Z is offline  
Old 02-23-2004, 02:15 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Red5.7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southgate, MI
Posts: 130
Even if both do fit, I'd take the 275 since it has a tad bit more sidewall.
Red5.7 is offline  
Old 02-23-2004, 11:30 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
raceguy333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SC
Posts: 42
the sidewalls are almost exactly the same...
275*.4 = 110mm
315*.35 = 110.25mm

and the 315 has a tad bit more..
raceguy333 is offline  
Old 02-23-2004, 01:30 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
hsyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 1,025
So you guys don't think there is much of a traction difference between the 2? I don't really care much about the minimum rim width for the 315 because there are many people out there running them on 9" rims still. But if the traction difference is that minimal then I'll stick to the 275.
hsyr is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 12:09 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
96redformula7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: El Paso
Posts: 405
Thumbs up

Do what I do, buy some rims from somewhere you can get cheap, I got the 5 star stock lt1 rims for $40 bucks each. Then, mount some ET STREETS.
96redformula7 is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 08:33 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
hsyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 1,025
Originally posted by 96redformula7
Do what I do, buy some rims from somewhere you can get cheap, I got the 5 star stock lt1 rims for $40 bucks each. Then, mount some ET STREETS.
Yea I would but considering that the closest track to me is 2 hours away and I'm on my stock 10 bolt that kind of traction isn't needed for me. All I was is a good daily driver tire that hooks better than street tires.
hsyr is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 10:56 AM
  #8  
Administrator
 
TedH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Brunswick, Maine 04011
Posts: 3,667
It isn't the tire that causes rear end probkems, it is the traction. You are looking for a tire that hooks at the track? If you find a tire and it hoks well, the shock to the rear will be the same regardless of the tire technology involved.

A set of ET Streets mounted on a second set of rims that you can use at the track is an easy solution. Mickey Thompson, BF Goodrich, and Nitto all have drag radials.

My guess is if your goal is to drive to the track, drop the tire pressure, race, put some air back in and drive home, then you want a tire that actually fits your rim within design parameters. Normal allowance is +/- one inch between the tire and rim widths for best traction and best wear.
TedH is offline  
Old 02-26-2004, 07:22 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
hsyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 1,025
Originally posted by tnthub
You are looking for a tire that hooks at the track?
No all I'm looking for is a tire and will give me maximum traction on the street that will fit my 17" rims and last more than 1000 miles. I have never been to the track before so ET streets or anything like that is out of the question. All I really want to know is if the 315 nitto will hook that much better than the 275 to buy them. Anyone use both that has an opinion?
hsyr is offline  
Old 02-26-2004, 07:43 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Gold Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Wichita Falls, TX
Posts: 269
When you put a 315 on a 9" rim it causes the tread to bow in the center causing a loss of traction and mileage. It doesn't matter if thr tread is slightly wider if it doesn't lay flat. A 275 fits the rim and lays flat and will give you much better traction. Go to your local tire store and talk to them...they will tell you the same thing.
Gold Z is offline  
Old 02-27-2004, 12:54 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
ABA383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Littlestown, PA
Posts: 1,903
I have had them both (275s and 315s BFG versions...) and I cut nearly identical 60's...with all being equal I vote for lighter and cheaper...

Besides, most 1/4 mile traction is based on the amount of tread on the ground from "front to back", not so much "side to side"...

Last edited by ABA383; 02-27-2004 at 12:58 PM.
ABA383 is offline  
Old 02-29-2004, 01:51 PM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
hsyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 1,025
Originally posted by ABA383
I have had them both (275s and 315s BFG versions...) and I cut nearly identical 60's...with all being equal I vote for lighter and cheaper...

Besides, most 1/4 mile traction is based on the amount of tread on the ground from "front to back", not so much "side to side"...

Just the answer I was looking for Thanx!
hsyr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WobblySausage
LT1 Based Engine Tech
6
10-07-2015 02:44 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
09-30-2015 04:20 PM
SergheiS
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
5
09-29-2015 08:56 PM
Bxlt1
Drivetrain
2
09-29-2015 03:18 PM



Quick Reply: Much Difference in traction?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 PM.