Drag Racing Technique Improve your track times

LT1 NA bolt-on only record is broken

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 30, 2008 | 02:16 AM
  #16  
AdioSS's Avatar
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,371
From: Kilgore TX 75662
Tom, congratulations! As far as I am concerned, you now own the record.

Anybody can swap to a carb-style intake manifold with fuel injection if they want. The LT1 intake manifold IS a restriction. There are better designs available.
Old May 30, 2008 | 02:24 AM
  #17  
AdioSS's Avatar
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,371
From: Kilgore TX 75662
oh yeah, I would love to see a video of your car in action if anybody has it?
Old May 30, 2008 | 05:33 AM
  #18  
tomcowle's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 463
From: GENEVA, Ohio
Thanks, as soon as my un-technical self can figure out how to download the vids I'll get them up and the timeslips.
Old May 30, 2008 | 08:52 AM
  #19  
1SlowFormula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,756
From: West Linn, OR
Tom if you need help with the technology stuff let me know I can see what I can do to help you out...
Old May 30, 2008 | 09:18 AM
  #20  
Gear Jammer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Congratulations Tom!

I say you should put the FI back on and click off some 11.60s to silence everyone.

You've put a lot of work into this and deserve the timeslip; unofficial record or not. Good for you!

Scott
Old May 30, 2008 | 11:52 AM
  #21  
Z28SORR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,768
From: Friendswood, TX, USA
Originally Posted by tomcowle
John, I'll let others debate that issue. The PM's and calls I've fielded from other members told me that this sort of response would be forthcoming. They also said even if I ran the FI people would still find exception about something just because that is the nature of the beast.

People can argue a thousand different points on what they believe this un-official class to be, I went with the common rules with a twist and that twist (the carb) is one of the most evil creations ever made if you listen to all the exerts boast on how FI is so superior to carbs.

To the person who asked, no this does not have a glide in it.

Mr Norton, I thought about the "cam only" deal, but I still haven't put in my good trans, good convertor, good carb, good exhaust, good rear-end or lightened my car anywhere nearly as much as the others have. So we'll see.

Yes, I have videos and timeslips that I need to figure out how to get into the computer.

Thanks everybody!
Please don't take my comments as detrimental or derogatory. I think what you've accomplished is out standing!

However it's also meaningless. A couple of magazine editors does not constitute and Official Body of anything!!
Did you set this "record" at an Official Sanctioned event? Were there other competitors there? Were the editors of GM High Tech Mag. there? Did they sanction the timing apparatus? Did they record this "record" in any kind of historical log? Did you get a "Tech Inspection" (for this "class") before you ran? Would Guinness World Records put this in their book?
If I literally, strip my car down to nothing but a drivetrain and drivers seat, and then beat your time, do I win? See what I mean?

Also, when people talk about FI being better then Carbs, they are NOT talking about WOT 1/4 mile runs.
Old May 31, 2008 | 02:04 AM
  #22  
AdioSS's Avatar
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,371
From: Kilgore TX 75662
Originally Posted by Z28SORR
Please don't take my comments as detrimental or derogatory. I think what you've accomplished is out standing!

However it's also meaningless. A couple of magazine editors does not constitute and Official Body of anything!!
Did you set this "record" at an Official Sanctioned event? Were there other competitors there? Were the editors of GM High Tech Mag. there? Did they sanction the timing apparatus? Did they record this "record" in any kind of historical log? Did you get a "Tech Inspection" (for this "class") before you ran? Would Guinness World Records put this in their book?
If I literally, strip my car down to nothing but a drivetrain and drivers seat, and then beat your time, do I win? See what I mean?

Also, when people talk about FI being better then Carbs, they are NOT talking about WOT 1/4 mile runs.
The track is probably NHRA or IHRA sanctioned. Had GMHTP editors been there, they probably would have given him credit AND given him hell for ditching fuel injection like everybody else is.

Why are so many people criticizing Tom? He is obviously more familiar with carbs, so he converted his car to utilize one. Anybody could do the same, ubt they wouldn't automatically run better. It is pretty common for higher power LT1s to change their intake manifolds out to a single plane or sheetmetal. There is simply more power to be extracted with a better intake manifold design.

If you think it is so easy, then go ahead and strip down your car and outrun him.
Old May 31, 2008 | 07:22 AM
  #23  
AL SS590 M6's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 1998
Posts: 6,247
From: Charlotte,MI USA
Originally Posted by AdioSS
It is pretty common for higher power LT1s to change their intake manifolds out to a single plane or sheetmetal. There is simply more power to be extracted with a better intake manifold design.
See you hit the nail on the head. It's not the carb that made the difference it's the manifold.
Old May 31, 2008 | 09:43 AM
  #24  
SNOTGREEN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 139
From: Lexington Park, MD
Originally Posted by AdioSS
If you think it is so easy, then go ahead and strip down your car and outrun him.
This quote here, may be the one most people should pay closest attention to regarding what was accomplished.

This isn't NASCAR, and the only way likely everybody would be happy is if the exact same mods were done to every single fbody, then shoot it out, it would come down to driver, track conditions, weather, tailwind, etc.

But that isn't the case. Non-power adder, stock internal (rotating assembly & heads), in an fbody. Do the most you can meeting that criteria, and who finishes first? I think those times are sick considering I am having fits just getting a 12-anything out of my own fbody.

Jealousy perhaps? I know I am a little!
Old May 31, 2008 | 09:09 PM
  #25  
3DFORMULA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 309
From: Bartonville, Ill
Fantastic job there Tom. You and 1slowformula are doing great. I enjoy seeing that the LT1 really has alot on the table from the factory. I haven't added any power yet to mine and I see some better times in it still on the table.
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 11:54 PM
  #26  
CamaroRacing12's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,307
From: Haverhill MA
congrats tom! but like many others i will agree that its unoffical... u really cant change the entire intake and expect it to still be a bolt on only car... but with what u did is amazing.... 11.70? like OMFG! good luck on any future goals... i give u all the credit in the world for your setup and times...

but i have to agree with john, shon still holds the offical record...
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 08:29 AM
  #27  
tomcowle's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 463
From: GENEVA, Ohio
Camaro12 et all,

I also don't think the intent of the rules was to gut a car down to the bare bones to the point it resembles a stripped recovery vehicle, nor run open headers or have the cars to not be street legal either. My car has a full interior with carpeting (except backseat), full exhaust system, bolt-on hood, I run on street tires (not slicks) and I drive my car to the track unlike those cars who have previously been faster than me. Do you see me complaining or adding exceptions to thier performance? They chose the route they did and I chose mine.

I've had plenty of conversations regarding my intake choice and the vast majority have said "Use it, but your not going to get the type of performance your expecting" Heck I even spoke to a person from GM High Tech and they said the same thing.

Honestly, if a person built a car specific to do this feat, the car could easily go 11.50's to 11.40's (maybe lower) without being overly exotic and still resemble a factory f-body and I'm not talking taking extreme weight measures into the equation. However its getting harder to find low mileage lt1 engines floating around and the "why bother" factor comes into play.

I'd like to thank all the well wishers and for the people who have called and thanked me that route.

Shon, its time to update your website. lol
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 07:21 PM
  #28  
CamaroRacing12's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,307
From: Haverhill MA
ok i first off congradulated u on ur accomplishment.... my car is full interior, a/c, erg, air, radio is all still in it also... and i drive my car to and from the track week in and week out and my car is a summer DD i drive it everywhere... so i agree with u on that...

but bottom line is a 1993-1997 F-Body did not come from the factory with a carb setup, therefore u did not break the bolt on record... but u did achieve something no one even thought was possible... i really think its amazing
Old Jun 3, 2008 | 06:56 AM
  #29  
SNOTGREEN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 139
From: Lexington Park, MD
But, these cars also didn't come with roller rockers(except LT4's), 12 bolt rears, 4.10 gears, aluminum driveshafts, larger bore throttle bodies, 255lph fuel pumps wired properly, modified PROMS/flash programs, 3600rpm stall converters, etc.

Why draw the line with a simple manifold/carb swap vice all these other modificiations? It isn't a sheetmetal or single plane high-rise intake with a dominator. Also, what about the guys that converted to coil-per cylinder? That wasn't factory equipment either. Or drag radials/slicks?

I think the fbody world needs a sanctioned "bolt-on" fbody shootout.
I also think it would be funny, if this said shootout had more than one class, lol!
Old Jun 3, 2008 | 09:55 AM
  #30  
3DFORMULA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 309
From: Bartonville, Ill
Originally Posted by SNOTGREEN
But, these cars also didn't come with roller rockers(except LT4's), 12 bolt rears, 4.10 gears, aluminum driveshafts, larger bore throttle bodies, 255lph fuel pumps wired properly, modified PROMS/flash programs, 3600rpm stall converters, etc.

Why draw the line with a simple manifold/carb swap vice all these other modificiations? It isn't a sheetmetal or single plane high-rise intake with a dominator. Also, what about the guys that converted to coil-per cylinder? That wasn't factory equipment either. Or drag radials/slicks?

I think the fbody world needs a sanctioned "bolt-on" fbody shootout.
I also think it would be funny, if this said shootout had more than one class, lol!
I like the idea.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 AM.