Front Tire Weight Difference
Front Tire Weight Difference
Has anyone actually compared the weights of the following two tires:
MT Sportsman Front 26 X 7.5 X 15
vs.
Pep Boys special, 165R15 or whatever the corresponding size is (can't think, too early).
They'll be going on a Centerline Telstar 15 X 4.
MT Sportsman Front 26 X 7.5 X 15
vs.
Pep Boys special, 165R15 or whatever the corresponding size is (can't think, too early).
They'll be going on a Centerline Telstar 15 X 4.
Re: Front Tire Weight Difference
Since the tires are roughly the same size, I'd say the 165R15 should be a bit heavier because of the steel belts of the radial. The 165R15 will also be a lot cheaper and will last longer.
Doing a quick web search:
The MT 26 x 7.5 is 16 pounds
A 165R15 is between 16 and 18 pounds depending on the brand. Most are 16.
Doing a quick web search:
The MT 26 x 7.5 is 16 pounds
A 165R15 is between 16 and 18 pounds depending on the brand. Most are 16.
Re: Front Tire Weight Difference
Good to know. I currently run the 165's, but have often wondered if my car would go faster on true front runners. Does anyone know? I would think the rolling resistance would be less with the MT's or any brand of belted front runner. Just curious if anyone has tracked this sort of thing.
Re: Front Tire Weight Difference
Originally Posted by maroon94z
Good to know. I currently run the 165's, but have often wondered if my car would go faster on true front runners. Does anyone know? I would think the rolling resistance would be less with the MT's or any brand of belted front runner. Just curious if anyone has tracked this sort of thing.
Well, I can't say for sure how much of a difference there would be, but less weight is always better.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carguy0119
2010 - 2015 Camaro Wheels, Tires, Brakes, Suspension
4
Apr 11, 2016 11:11 PM
Hurin
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
4
Dec 13, 2014 07:38 PM
chevroletfreak
LT1 Based Engine Tech
202
Jul 4, 2005 05:00 PM



