1/8 times
#1
1/8 times
Ran the 1/8 (only thing close) the other night. Ran a few 9.3s when the sun was up. Temp was lower 90s with about %80 humidity. Sun went down, was still upper 80s though. Here's my best run of the night.
R/T: .812
60': 2.170
330: 5.980
1/8: 9.177
MPH: 76.35
I don't think that's too bad for a near stock 1990 350. Someone said that would put me at low 14s and possibly high 13s. I dunno about that. Any idea what that would come out to in the 1/4?
R/T: .812
60': 2.170
330: 5.980
1/8: 9.177
MPH: 76.35
I don't think that's too bad for a near stock 1990 350. Someone said that would put me at low 14s and possibly high 13s. I dunno about that. Any idea what that would come out to in the 1/4?
#2
14.3's@97-98 MPH.
------------------
1996 Z28 Camaro
2001 best 1/4 BFG DR's NA - 11.865@113.57 w/1.634 60', 1/8 - 7.563@89.82mph Best 1/4 MPH 114.82 - Best 1/8 MPH 90.73 - 2002 Mid 11's NA, Mid 10's n2o
1989 GMC 1500 truck for work 18.1@73 305
8 cats to feed clean after 1999 V6 Mustang 5 speed
15.358@89.47 MPH w/ 2.227 60'
15.364@90.92 MPH w/ 2.383 60'
------------------
1996 Z28 Camaro
2001 best 1/4 BFG DR's NA - 11.865@113.57 w/1.634 60', 1/8 - 7.563@89.82mph Best 1/4 MPH 114.82 - Best 1/8 MPH 90.73 - 2002 Mid 11's NA, Mid 10's n2o
1989 GMC 1500 truck for work 18.1@73 305
8 cats to feed clean after 1999 V6 Mustang 5 speed
15.358@89.47 MPH w/ 2.227 60'
15.364@90.92 MPH w/ 2.383 60'
#3
from info from other runs by other people, those 1/8th mi. times come to:
14.11 @ 95.98
just an estimate, could always use more info.
------------------
1993 Grabber Blue Mustang GT
"Bolt-On's" (no power adder(s)
13.007 @ 108.39 w/ 2.149 60'
14.11 @ 95.98
just an estimate, could always use more info.
------------------
1993 Grabber Blue Mustang GT
"Bolt-On's" (no power adder(s)
13.007 @ 108.39 w/ 2.149 60'
#4
My Z28 ran stock,
60' - 2.139 (but I did get a couple of 2.06's in there)
330' - 5.929
660' - 9.097@77.99 MPH
1320'- 14.085@99.16 MPH
To run a 1/4 @ 14.11@95.98 MPH with a 1/8 @ 9.177@76.35 MPH would mean you would get (1/4)/(1/8) of 1.538, which is what cars with very strong topend charge get. Those year 350's were low end cars. If you say his 1/4 MPH would be 101-102, then it might pull it off then.
But none the less, a good running car.
------------------
1996 Z28 Camaro
2001 best 1/4 BFG DR's NA - 11.865@113.57 w/1.634 60', 1/8 - 7.563@89.82mph Best 1/4 MPH 114.82 - Best 1/8 MPH 90.73 - 2002 Mid 11's NA, Mid 10's n2o
1989 GMC 1500 truck for work 18.1@73 305
8 cats to feed clean after 1999 V6 Mustang 5 speed
15.358@89.47 MPH w/ 2.227 60'
15.364@90.92 MPH w/ 2.383 60'
60' - 2.139 (but I did get a couple of 2.06's in there)
330' - 5.929
660' - 9.097@77.99 MPH
1320'- 14.085@99.16 MPH
To run a 1/4 @ 14.11@95.98 MPH with a 1/8 @ 9.177@76.35 MPH would mean you would get (1/4)/(1/8) of 1.538, which is what cars with very strong topend charge get. Those year 350's were low end cars. If you say his 1/4 MPH would be 101-102, then it might pull it off then.
But none the less, a good running car.
------------------
1996 Z28 Camaro
2001 best 1/4 BFG DR's NA - 11.865@113.57 w/1.634 60', 1/8 - 7.563@89.82mph Best 1/4 MPH 114.82 - Best 1/8 MPH 90.73 - 2002 Mid 11's NA, Mid 10's n2o
1989 GMC 1500 truck for work 18.1@73 305
8 cats to feed clean after 1999 V6 Mustang 5 speed
15.358@89.47 MPH w/ 2.227 60'
15.364@90.92 MPH w/ 2.383 60'
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
squarehead
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
0
11-21-2014 08:02 PM
stars1010
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
6
07-17-2002 04:36 PM
stars1010
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
1
07-15-2002 03:51 AM