Will the PE vs RPM table be used in open loop?
Re: Will the PE vs RPM table be used in open loop?
He is talking about BLM locker being able to lock the wot reference blm to 128. It does not learn at wot the wot tables are affected by the last known blm before wot condition was engaged.
That is nice and all, but it only helps wot tuning be consistent. What we really need is a way to select when we want open loop activated so that it's only during cruise maps and rpms. Isn't there some kind of way to trick the computer so that it looks at the open loop afr tables only in cell 6??
That is nice and all, but it only helps wot tuning be consistent. What we really need is a way to select when we want open loop activated so that it's only during cruise maps and rpms. Isn't there some kind of way to trick the computer so that it looks at the open loop afr tables only in cell 6??
Re: Will the PE vs RPM table be used in open loop?
Originally Posted by canbaufo
Another question is, regardless of closed loop or open loop; when it uses the PE vs RPM table does it wait until the MAF is maxed or does it start using it at less than 100 KPA? ...or ...does it start at 100 KPA and before and after the MAF maxes?
Re: Will the PE vs RPM table be used in open loop?
Originally Posted by 96 WS6
He is talking about BLM locker being able to lock the wot reference blm to 128. It does not learn at wot the wot tables are affected by the last known blm before wot condition was engaged.
That is nice and all, but it only helps wot tuning be consistent. What we really need is a way to select when we want open loop activated so that it's only during cruise maps and rpms. Isn't there some kind of way to trick the computer so that it looks at the open loop afr tables only in cell 6??
That is nice and all, but it only helps wot tuning be consistent. What we really need is a way to select when we want open loop activated so that it's only during cruise maps and rpms. Isn't there some kind of way to trick the computer so that it looks at the open loop afr tables only in cell 6??
Re: Will the PE vs RPM table be used in open loop?
There is no AFR table in LT1 Edit. Does anyone know of an equivalent table in it (not where I can look at it right now)?
I could have sworn there was a way to limit BLM's in certain ranges with a software upgrade, maybe I should do a search on it to bring some of that stuff back up.
I wish someone could clear up the truth about how and when the PE vs RPM table is used (whether closed loop or open loop, either one). Any mainstream tuners who wish to chime in feel free
I could have sworn there was a way to limit BLM's in certain ranges with a software upgrade, maybe I should do a search on it to bring some of that stuff back up.
I wish someone could clear up the truth about how and when the PE vs RPM table is used (whether closed loop or open loop, either one). Any mainstream tuners who wish to chime in feel free
Re: Will the PE vs RPM table be used in open loop?
ok, did a search and http://web.camaross.com/forums/showt...ght=blm+locker post #8 says you can use the BLM locker to run PE mode (open loop basically?) up to say ~1200 rpm. Does this at least mean you can lock BLM's at 128 at whatever RPM's you choose? If so then I guess that may be of help albeit not ideal. I'm telling you there is something else though. I have read about people limiting fuel trims to 120 ....will search some more.
Re: Will the PE vs RPM table be used in open loop?
Originally Posted by canbaufo
There is no AFR table in LT1 Edit. Does anyone know of an equivalent table in it (not where I can look at it right now)?
I could have sworn there was a way to limit BLM's in certain ranges with a software upgrade, maybe I should do a search on it to bring some of that stuff back up.
I wish someone could clear up the truth about how and when the PE vs RPM table is used (whether closed loop or open loop, either one). Any mainstream tuners who wish to chime in feel free
I could have sworn there was a way to limit BLM's in certain ranges with a software upgrade, maybe I should do a search on it to bring some of that stuff back up.
I wish someone could clear up the truth about how and when the PE vs RPM table is used (whether closed loop or open loop, either one). Any mainstream tuners who wish to chime in feel free

Re: Will the PE vs RPM table be used in open loop?
Another way I have read about is to change the throttle % to enable pe at 1200-2000 rpm to zero % so when you are cruising in that range at light throttle you are in pe. You can adjust fuel in the wot tables because you are not going wot under 2000 rpm anyway. It was something like that... then something about setting limits on the blms so the comp doesn't try to do anything.
Re: Will the PE vs RPM table be used in open loop?
Originally Posted by 96 WS6
Another way I have read about is to change the throttle % to enable pe at 1200-2000 rpm to zero % so when you are cruising in that range at light throttle you are in pe. You can adjust fuel in the wot tables because you are not going wot under 2000 rpm anyway. It was something like that... then something about setting limits on the blms so the comp doesn't try to do anything.
you can just set the min and max blm to 128 and accomplish the same thing. the integrator can only move the fuel trim about 5%
Re: Will the PE vs RPM table be used in open loop?
Originally Posted by canbaufo
??????????
I think we must be talking about two entirely different things. I wasn't aware of closed loop learning happening at WOT, never heard of such a thing.
I think we must be talking about two entirely different things. I wasn't aware of closed loop learning happening at WOT, never heard of such a thing.
I can send a copy if you want, post or pm me your email.
Originally Posted by canbaufo
I was talking about limiting the max fuel trim to say ~120 (instead of 108) in the cells where I see the surge (30-50 KPA at 1200-1800 RPM) .....or ....in the MAF AFGS where I see the surge (13-30) ....surely there is a way to specify a range, no?
Originally Posted by infinitebird
I don't know of any way to do that. You can of course set the max trim in the constants, but I don't know of any way to have different maxes for different map or rpm values.
Re: Will the PE vs RPM table be used in open loop?
Originally Posted by canbaufo
I do have something in fuel that says "BLM = 128 at WOT, yes or no" ...I guess that's a way to lock the BLM? ...so I must have that feature already. How do you set the max trim? ...I might get by just fine doing that. I am interested in what 96 WS6 is saying too. CollinsAuto ....are you saying that even if min and max BLM are set to 128 it can still move around by 5% ?
Re: Will the PE vs RPM table be used in open loop?
I tried that WOT BLM locker program and it works perfectly. Everything is locked to 128 the second I go into PE mode. After working on the car this weekend I figured out that my car has an exhaust leak at the x pipe on the driver's side. I believe that is probably causing most of my surging at cruise problem and slightly split blms. Now the car runs like a beast at WOT but mediocre everywhere else.
Charlie, what is the original reason for you wanting open loop at cruise? Is there something in closed loop that you know for a fact is causing the surge? Could it be something physical or mechanical?
Charlie, what is the original reason for you wanting open loop at cruise? Is there something in closed loop that you know for a fact is causing the surge? Could it be something physical or mechanical?
Re: Will the PE vs RPM table be used in open loop?
Originally Posted by 96 WS6
I tried that WOT BLM locker program and it works perfectly. Everything is locked to 128 the second I go into PE mode. After working on the car this weekend I figured out that my car has an exhaust leak at the x pipe on the driver's side. I believe that is probably causing most of my surging at cruise problem and slightly split blms. Now the car runs like a beast at WOT but mediocre everywhere else.
Charlie, what is the original reason for you wanting open loop at cruise? Is there something in closed loop that you know for a fact is causing the surge? Could it be something physical or mechanical?
Charlie, what is the original reason for you wanting open loop at cruise? Is there something in closed loop that you know for a fact is causing the surge? Could it be something physical or mechanical?
Cmahsaft overlap create high oxygen content in the exhuast at low engine speeds. the net effect of this is that the PCM is fooled into thinking the engine is leaner then it is. In many cases you do not want the idle to be at 14.7:1 you might actually want it alot leaner then that due to the camshaft overlap tossing oxygen down the header tube !
Re: Will the PE vs RPM table be used in open loop?
Originally Posted by CollinsAuto
Cmahsaft overlap create high oxygen content in the exhuast at low engine speeds. the net effect of this is that the PCM is fooled into thinking the engine is leaner then it is. In many cases you do not want the idle to be at 14.7:1 you might actually want it alot leaner then that due to the camshaft overlap tossing oxygen down the header tube !
Interesting... I have been trying to understand what more overlap requires in terms of tuning. My cam is on a 115 lsa... should I use the VE tables or the MAF calibration tables to add fuel? First I want to get that exhaust leak I found this weekend fixed before I mess with anything.
Re: Will the PE vs RPM table be used in open loop?
Originally Posted by 96 WS6
Interesting... I have been trying to understand what more overlap requires in terms of tuning. My cam is on a 115 lsa... should I use the VE tables or the MAF calibration tables to add fuel? First I want to get that exhaust leak I found this weekend fixed before I mess with anything.


