Computer Diagnostics and Tuning Technical discussion on diagnostics and programming of the F-body computers

What version of Windows for TunerCAT?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 7, 2009 | 12:14 PM
  #1  
HardcoreRM125's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,628
From: Pgh, PA
What version of Windows for TunerCAT?

I am going to start tuning for my 95' OBDI LT1 car.

Recently got a laptop off a friend that is god awful slow (cause it has been p04n'ed out) so I am deleted all kinds of ****, and debating whether to ditch XP for an older operating system.

The computer will be used exclusively for tuning and playing Duke Nukem while driving around so I have zero qualms about "downgrading" to a better version of that **** we call Windows ...

Suggestions?

Or would you just stick with XP?

Joe




PS - Still haven't entirely ruled out LT1 Edit, but Tuner Cat seems to give me more options and doesn't lock me to a particular PCM. And it is cheaper
Old Aug 7, 2009 | 03:29 PM
  #2  
WS6T3RROR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,517
From: Engineerland
Xp has always been fine for me to do anything I needed to with tuning. I don't see any benefit in going to something older.

ps- entirely rule out lt1 edit, tunercat will do whatever you want to.
Old Aug 7, 2009 | 07:48 PM
  #3  
shoebox's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 27,725
From: Little Rock, AR
Tunercat works fine on my old W98 garage computer.
Old Aug 8, 2009 | 12:00 PM
  #4  
evilundisguised's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 302
I prefer XP, and haven't been able to get Tunercat to work with Vista (2 diff laptops)
Old Aug 9, 2009 | 11:49 AM
  #5  
DOOM Master's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 615
From: Pekin, IL, United States
I still use Win98 for my dedicated tuning PCs, both the desktop I have in the garage and my laptop (which is set for dual boot with WINXP for non-tuning stuff). Both are older equipment (Pentium 3 systems), so XP isn't always the fastest choice in my experience. I don't seem to have any problems running Tunercat on XP or 98, so that shouldn't be an issue.

As for LT1Edit, don't waste your money. Get Tunercat.
Old Aug 16, 2009 | 01:21 AM
  #6  
NJLT1SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 661
From: Montville, NJ, U.S.A.
Originally Posted by evilundisguised
I prefer XP, and haven't been able to get Tunercat to work with Vista (2 diff laptops)
That stinks, I just bought a new laptop that has Vista. I emailed the people at Tuner Cat, and here is the response I got:

Hi Nick,

Yes, the program will run under Windows Vista. We have not done any testing with Windows 7 yet but we do have one customer who ran it under Windows 7 without any problems

Best regards,

TC
Old Aug 16, 2009 | 01:25 AM
  #7  
reamo04's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,705
From: Kansas
i run TC on vista no problem...however, for datalogging, dont even think of vista Freescan wont load properly, and datamaster will not work either.

I am picking up an old fujitsubo laptop from a friend for $100 for datalogging.
Old Aug 16, 2009 | 01:30 AM
  #8  
NJLT1SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 661
From: Montville, NJ, U.S.A.
Looks like I will still have to keep my old Toshiba Pentium 1 with Windows 95 on it for Freescan, or data logging.


Nick
Old Aug 16, 2009 | 06:41 AM
  #9  
NJ-LE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 572
Acer 4420 running under Vista Home Premium here. TunerCat (rev 2.23) runs with no difficulties. FreeScan (rev 2.10) alway loads, usually runs but when logging to a .csv file, during the collecting it sometimes writes the same time slice repeatedly. Using the "force data" button will force it to write fresh data. Welcome to the "magic" of windows ...
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 07:50 PM
  #10  
HardcoreRM125's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,628
From: Pgh, PA
Well guys I got the computer up and running. I am using a hacked version of XP that pretty much eliminates all the bull **** that makes it a memory hog and adds some options. We will see how this OS dilemma turns out ...

But assuming I have no problems - I went ahead and got TunerCAT and the $EE Definition file. I have my cable. And I downloaded FreeScan and the trail version of Datamaster ...

As soon as I get my new lap top battery, I will test the stuff out! I really do need to hook up my Wide Band first though so I have a more solid idea of the A/F before I play with things...
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 08:12 PM
  #11  
evilundisguised's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 302
What wideband hardware/software do you have?
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 08:30 PM
  #12  
HardcoreRM125's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,628
From: Pgh, PA
Got an Innovate LC-1 sitting in my bedroom. Maybe over the next couple weeks I will get that **** installed and rolling...
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 09:21 PM
  #13  
DOOM Master's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 615
From: Pekin, IL, United States
Originally Posted by HardcoreRM125
As soon as I get my new lap top battery, I will test the stuff out! I really do need to hook up my Wide Band first though so I have a more solid idea of the A/F before I play with things...
Do not rely upon a laptop battery while tuning, especially if you are writing to the PCM. Get yourself a good inverter from Walmart or a hardware store and hardwire it to your battery. It will save you the trouble of fried PCMs.
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 09:46 PM
  #14  
HardcoreRM125's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,628
From: Pgh, PA
Why do you hardwire it?

To prevent some bull**** failure from a blown cig lighter fuse or something?
Old Aug 19, 2009 | 07:17 AM
  #15  
NJ-LE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 572
I think the most stable power is from the laptop's own battery. Just put it on the charger to top it off just before loading a tune. The tune load only takes about 4 minutes.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 AM.