VEMaster???
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,009
From: so close I can taste it...
First you need to have your blm cell rpm and map stuff figured out so that you're using as much of each fuel trim cell as you can.
Then go out and run a datalog...the longer the better.
All you're going to modify in the ve tables is 3000rpm and below so there isn't much of a need to go any higher.
Open vemaster and it is going to ask you for a datamaster file and a bin file. Give it the datamaster file that you just made and the bin file you want to modify.
Then you can set it to adjust to whatever blm you want to shoot for. 124 should work fine in most cases.
Then let vemaster do it's work. It will create a word document that allows you to see how many records it has in each fuel trim cell and what the average blm was in each and what kind of multiplier it used to change the values in your ve tables. It also creates a new bin file (of the same name) with the modified ve tables.
Load the new bin into your chip and go out and do it all over again.
Usually 3 or 4 times does the trick and you'll know when to stop when vemaster is making small changes. Then leave well enough alone you should notice that the car runs much better at part throttle.
Then go out and run a datalog...the longer the better.
All you're going to modify in the ve tables is 3000rpm and below so there isn't much of a need to go any higher.
Open vemaster and it is going to ask you for a datamaster file and a bin file. Give it the datamaster file that you just made and the bin file you want to modify.
Then you can set it to adjust to whatever blm you want to shoot for. 124 should work fine in most cases.
Then let vemaster do it's work. It will create a word document that allows you to see how many records it has in each fuel trim cell and what the average blm was in each and what kind of multiplier it used to change the values in your ve tables. It also creates a new bin file (of the same name) with the modified ve tables.
Load the new bin into your chip and go out and do it all over again.
Usually 3 or 4 times does the trick and you'll know when to stop when vemaster is making small changes. Then leave well enough alone you should notice that the car runs much better at part throttle.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,827
From: Waynesboro, PA
Ok, so VEMaster automatically makes a new .bin file with the updated changes, and the word file is just to show you what it changed......Got it.
Have you used it, and did you have any luck, and were you happy with it?
Have you used it, and did you have any luck, and were you happy with it?
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,009
From: so close I can taste it...
Originally posted by The Highlander
Well.. VE Master never changed anything for me... Thanks
Well.. VE Master never changed anything for me... Thanks
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 124
(*) - An overflow occurred when applying the adj factor to the
original VE table entry. The max allowable value is being used, but it is
recommended you look for exhaust or intake vacuum leaks, since VE should
never be in excess of 100 (unless you have some kind of forced induction)
Does that message always show up when you run vemaster?
original VE table entry. The max allowable value is being used, but it is
recommended you look for exhaust or intake vacuum leaks, since VE should
never be in excess of 100 (unless you have some kind of forced induction)
Does that message always show up when you run vemaster?
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 178
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
While they say that VE Master won't work with 94-95 cars and only works with 96-97, I have noticed a difference on mine... a 1995.
What I have noticed is that my BLM values when driving are closer to 124 and there is less of a split BLM issue then what I had before. While, without a scanner, I may have not noticed the differences, I feel that the closer the BLM's are... and the less the computer has to adjust... the smoother the car.
Also, at WOT, as the BLM's remain under 128... my WOT BLM's stick at 128... whereas, if BLM's were higher... they would also be higher at WOT, and make tuning a little more difficult.
Just my $.02
What I have noticed is that my BLM values when driving are closer to 124 and there is less of a split BLM issue then what I had before. While, without a scanner, I may have not noticed the differences, I feel that the closer the BLM's are... and the less the computer has to adjust... the smoother the car.
Also, at WOT, as the BLM's remain under 128... my WOT BLM's stick at 128... whereas, if BLM's were higher... they would also be higher at WOT, and make tuning a little more difficult.
Just my $.02