Computer Diagnostics and Tuning Technical discussion on diagnostics and programming of the F-body computers

Guru's please look at Freescan file and tell me whats wrong.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 10:16 AM
  #1  
RUNMYTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 232
From: Bristol, Tn
Guru's please look at Freescan file and tell me whats wrong.

I had my tune real close and now I go way rich at WOT and can only make 9psi vs 13 before.

http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=c...4e75f6e8ebb871
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 11:22 AM
  #2  
dookie454's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 573
Originally Posted by RUNMYTA
I had my tune real close and now I go way rich at WOT and can only make 9psi vs 13 before.

http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=c...4e75f6e8ebb871
I didnt look at the file, but based off what you said and I assume your using PE vs RPM to increase fuel then your running rich because fuel was set for 13psi, and now your only at 9psi and the fuel is still set for 13psi so it's rich.. that's the problem with running PE vs RPM is it's adding fuel based off RPM not actual airflow. This is all assuming a bunch of stuff but that's what happens when the PCM isnt detecting actual Boost.
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 04:20 PM
  #3  
RUNMYTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 232
From: Bristol, Tn
What would be the prefered way to tune for boost and not use PE vs RPM? Now if only I can find why I am not making 13psi, then my tune should come back online, until the outside temp changes drastically.
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 08:52 PM
  #4  
dookie454's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 573
Without running a boost referencing system (2 bar, 3 bar, etc) then your limited in what you can do since anything over 100kpa is unknown boost your entering the "unknown" area anytime you have 1+psi, basically timing and fuel have to be set for full WOT Boost, anything less than WOT is going to be overfueled and undertimed (in your case with less PSI then it was tuned for) unless you have something to compensate such as an FMU or some type of add on computer to help with boost, or a full out $3000 aftermarket system.

I personally stuck a 2 bar sensor in place of the 1bar and adjusted all the tables to compensate since I couldnt figure another way around the stock PCM limitations and the FMU setups werent reliable and no way am I spending $3000 on software that our stock PCM's cant run, fustrating.

Around 6psi you dont need much other then PE vs RPM, anything over that usually u will end up wanting more control.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Aaront810
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
13
Aug 29, 2020 09:34 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Sep 30, 2015 04:20 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
1
Sep 15, 2015 11:53 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Sep 14, 2015 02:02 AM
tommalcolm
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
2
Sep 11, 2015 03:39 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 AM.