Computer Diagnostics and Tuning Technical discussion on diagnostics and programming of the F-body computers

Check out my Freescan Track data. Looking for suggestions...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 30, 2003 | 04:38 PM
  #1  
roguedriver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,194
From: Albuquerque, NM.
Check out my Freescan Track data. Looking for suggestions...

Went to the track today with the laptop. So my first WOT run showed BLM's at the low 130 (L) low 150 (R) range with about 1 to 2* of knock retard. I was running with 46psi fuel pressure. So I bumped the FP to 50lbs. The BLM's dropped a little bit (in the 130/140 range), but not much better. So I changed the injector constant from 24lbs to 22lbs to try and richen things up (I think this is the cheap and incorrect way vs changing the tables, but wanted to see what it would do). It really made a difference. My BLM's went down to 128/128 through the whole run with no KR at all, and my total timing was peaking at 44*. I shaved an instant 2 tenths off right there. I tried going lower on the injector constant, but think I passed the sweet spot cause the next two runs with the injectors running at 21lbs were a tenth slower. I put it back to 22lbs and scanned it while driving home. The drivability was changed a little bit, but not much. BLM's while driving are now around 115/115 to 128/128. A little richer then before. My questions are, which tables can I make changes to in TunerCat to run richer like I am now instead of changing the injector constant? Or, should I just leave things where there at? Also, should I change my VE tables below 3000 rpm to get my BLM's closer to 128 under normal driving conditions? Thanks in advance.
Ken R. 95Z
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 01:25 PM
  #2  
Hal Fisher's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 798
From: San Jose, CA
Seems like you did the correct thing, I'd leave it a lone. I have never been able to get mine to 128 and may actually try just fooling with the inj constant. If there was an altitude change between the track and where you normally drive this new setting may be in the middle.

The high advance of 44 was probably when letting off the throttle. The stock tables under load just aren't that high (add 3 degrees on what it says in the map100 table to get actual advance).

Hal
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
teal98
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
15
Sep 16, 2002 01:23 PM
danielbmx
Car Audio and Electronics
0
Aug 27, 2002 11:11 PM
johnsocal
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
21
Aug 17, 2002 01:06 AM
SilverWS6
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
13
Aug 14, 2002 09:29 PM
newby
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
10
Jul 27, 2002 11:39 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10 AM.