Classic Engine Tech 1967 - 1981 Engine Related

stock aluminum intakes... r they n e good

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 16, 2002 | 09:05 AM
  #1  
cwilgo63's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 39
From: Bremond, TX, USA
Post stock aluminum intakes... r they n e good

i have an 81 z with a 350....its been rebuilt and has an almost stock idle, stock heads with a performance valve job, roller rockers and pathetic 8.5 compression ratio....i have a 750 cfm quadrajet,shorty headers and a perfomance ignition i've always heard good things about chevy alum intakes and i was wondering if it would b worth it to but an edelbrock performer or rpm... i was told the intake cam stock on the car ang it has all the egr crap which i've capped off...thanx
Old Aug 19, 2002 | 06:46 PM
  #2  
Damon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,147
From: Phila., PA
Post

The aluminum LT-1 intake is good (early 70s). The 80s-era aluminum low-rise intake, however, is purely a weight savings piece- it don't flow worth a crap.

If it's got the 4-hole carburetor pattern to fit a QJet (tiny primaries, huge secondaries) it's an emissions-era piece and not good for performance. An Edlebrock performer will kick it's a$$.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
97TA-WS6-Con
Parts For Sale
7
Feb 1, 2015 01:01 PM
InfernalVortex
LT1 Based Engine Tech
3
Jan 17, 2015 09:35 AM
89 iroc zl1
3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech
0
Jan 14, 2015 02:18 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23 PM.