Classic Engine Tech 1967 - 1981 Engine Related

Project F-117 Stealth Details

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 20, 2003 | 08:18 PM
  #16  
Bliggida's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 412
From: SAY Town
Sounds a lot like what I have planned for the '79 Z28.

only differences would be
295 front, 345 rear
blown nitrous
and 1KRWHP
with a 6 (12) speed.
Old Mar 20, 2003 | 09:52 PM
  #17  
68 Camaro Conv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 35
From: Jacksonville FL
I want to go back to something in the first post,
F 117...Sleek, fast, agile
You sure it was a 117 that you were in?? they are none of these things, LOL

Looking forward to seeing pics of the project
Old Mar 20, 2003 | 10:56 PM
  #18  
Bliggida's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 412
From: SAY Town
Probably commenting on how they look? Because, have to admit they do look all those things, even if they actually aren't.

Any goals for the quartermile too?
Old Mar 20, 2003 | 11:13 PM
  #19  
teamsleep13's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 199
From: Seattle Area
Ya I know those planes arent tooo impressive perfomance wise....but they sure look WICKED!!! All those hard sharp edges make them look fast and agile......but ya you get the point.


Quarter mile.....I would be happy will 10's on street tires. Not really building it for the 1/4. I want raw performance on the track, and I want it to scare the F*** outta me when I hit the loud pedal.

If any of you watch Top Gear, and have seen their reviews on either the Countach, Zonda, or the Mclaren, you will know what I mean. Jeremy Clarkson and Tiff Needle drive those things and have lots of fun doing it, but I know they have got to be shakin when they get outta the cars.

I want that.

Hunter
Old Mar 28, 2003 | 05:24 PM
  #20  
Ken S's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 2,368
From: OR
If I were you, I'd sick a good chunk of my concentration in designing and engineering first... with a low target weight in mind..

excellent chassis and suspension design + low weight(like 2000 lbs) Add in good aero's, and you'll proabably be able to exceed all your expectations with "mild" 500 HP 7.0L LS1.

If it was possible, I'd rather lose a 1000 lbs on my Camaro than have a 1000 hp.
Old Mar 28, 2003 | 11:28 PM
  #21  
Dr.Mudge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,148
From: Bay Area, CA
Re: DETAILS!!!!!

Originally posted by teamsleep13
I am still deciding on a transmission, but currently it is between a 4L80 or a G force manual.
Supercar with an automatic?............ Beef up the T56 and leave it. You wont be hooking with supercar tires or suspension anyway.
Old Mar 28, 2003 | 11:33 PM
  #22  
Dr.Mudge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,148
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally posted by teamsleep13
Quarter mile.....I would be happy will 10's on street tires. Not really building it for the 1/4.
I haven't seen a McClaren under low 11s, the suspension just doesn't have it in it.
Old Mar 28, 2003 | 11:35 PM
  #23  
Dr.Mudge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,148
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally posted by Ken S
If it was possible, I'd rather lose a 1000 lbs on my Camaro than have a 1000 hp.
Dont see that happening without ridiculous money. www.fastassdatsun.com has a chance, that is his goal, but its still iffy. C4 front and rear suspension, around 600-650 HP last I heard was the intent, and full box frame with 2000 pound weight.
Old Mar 29, 2003 | 03:26 AM
  #24  
Bliggida's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 412
From: SAY Town
Yeah, and in building a supercar, yet its lightweight, but its still going to have all the ammenities. 3,000 pounds after roll cage and stereo would be a tremendous feat.

My best hope for mine was 3,250 pounds.
Old Apr 2, 2003 | 10:53 AM
  #25  
Ken S's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 2,368
From: OR
Originally posted by Dr.Mudge
Dont see that happening without ridiculous money. www.fastassdatsun.com has a chance, that is his goal, but its still iffy. C4 front and rear suspension, around 600-650 HP last I heard was the intent, and full box frame with 2000 pound weight.
Yah.. but you can always dream..

For the rediculous money:
http://www.moslerauto.com/mt900/index.html
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jbert55
LT1 Based Engine Tech
19
Oct 31, 2015 03:52 PM
sherwinZ28
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
11
Aug 15, 2015 05:38 PM
Rittmeister
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
4
Aug 7, 2015 01:13 AM
jbert55
New Member Introduction
1
Aug 3, 2015 05:49 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 AM.