Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Is it the year 2000 again? Just wow...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 08:18 AM
  #1  
USHotRod's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 639
From: Anchorage, AK
Is it the year 2000 again? Just wow...

http://finance.yahoo.com/family-home...od=family-home

An "independant" review.

Funny they didnt mention that these very same brands have quite a few of the top rated, most recommended models as well. Nope...they've got a long way to go to catch up.
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 08:31 AM
  #2  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Sounds like BS. Notice they don't say why they are rated the way they are.

The F-250 Lariat earned both the "worst value" and "worst safety performance" distinctions from Consumer Reports this year. It received an overall score of just 37 out of 100 points for predicted reliability, fuel economy, depreciation, ride, owner costs, accident avoidance, front-seat comfort, acceleration and owner satisfaction.
Um.. hello...the F250 is a large and expensive work truck, not a sports cars and luxury sedan. CR is so stupid.
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 09:18 AM
  #3  
El Duce's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 429
Well let's be honest here though, the Aveo, the Colorado/Canyon and the Nitro are some of the worst cars out there. (although I know someone on here will chime in with, "well my Colorado has been great") As a matter of fact, there's almost nothing from Dodge that is noteworthy. And I think anybody who's been in a Escalade lately knows that it might be one of the most overrated cars on the road.

I don't like how they ignore giving specifics for the cars that have been rated well, but I don't have a problem with naming the cars that they did as being pretty crappy.
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 09:56 AM
  #4  
km9v's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,296
From: Beaumont, TX
I wish it was 2000 again. then I'd have a brand new Camaro in my garage.
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 10:25 AM
  #5  
STOCK1SC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,049
From: Confederate States of America
Originally Posted by km9v
I wish it was 2000 again. then I'd have a brand new Camaro in my garage.
or maybe stop the 9/11 attacks.
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 10:36 AM
  #6  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
The Escalade is the only one that I'd question.

If it's that bad, why arent the Tahoe/Avalanche/Suburban/Yukon, etc listed? In fact, those have all gotten decent to good reviews from what I remember a few years back when they came out.

I can't imagine the Cadillac interior blows up the the whole thing.

I can kinda understand the others.
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 11:17 AM
  #7  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by Darth Xed
The Escalade is the only one that I'd question.

If it's that bad, why arent the Tahoe/Avalanche/Suburban/Yukon, etc listed? In fact, those have all gotten decent to good reviews from what I remember a few years back when they came out.

I can't imagine the Cadillac interior blows up the the whole thing.

I can kinda understand the others.
I agree, and in fact the Cadillac has the best interior out of all of them. Engine and transmission are great. I don't understand what the problem is. Probably MPG
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 12:26 PM
  #8  
soul strife's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 824
From: North of Cincy
A buddy of mine has an '06 F-250 and that thing has been bullet proof. It's a solid and has a great ride for a HD truck. He's owns a HVAC company and uses the truck daily so... I don't know what the problem is with a work truck that has a nice interior.
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 12:57 PM
  #9  
Silverado C-10's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,897
From: Greenville, SC
Some of those do deserve to be on the list...

Last edited by Silverado C-10; Apr 12, 2010 at 01:00 PM.
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 01:10 PM
  #10  
USHotRod's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 639
From: Anchorage, AK
Originally Posted by Silverado C-10
Some of those do deserve to be on the list...
While I dont doubt that, its just yet again a blatant bias towards impots.

A more responsible report would have also pointed out that the domestics do have a lot of class leading models as well. Not "they have a long way to go." Thats just feeding people misinformation and furthers the mindset that everything domestic made is inferior.
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 01:26 PM
  #11  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
This is a big nothing really.

Colorado is how old now (with no real changes)?
Aveo is how old now (with no real changes)?

Colorado doesn't have much of a future and the new Aveo is coming soon. These "worst car" lists have often been completely baseless because they continue to degrade big trucks and SUVs for being inefficient (well, duuuuhh!) I actually agree that the Escalade doesn't represent good value when compared to a Tahoe or Suburban, but you're paying for "bling" and name.

I can think of many bad imports (most anything by Scion and the new Honda Insight) but you won't catch CR in agreement with most other magazines on these.
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 01:44 PM
  #12  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
I actually agree that the Escalade doesn't represent good value when compared to a Tahoe or Suburban, but you're paying for "bling" and name.

This is probably quite true, but then value of purchase should not be a factor in "worst-made" vehcile lists...

"Worst-made" to me, implies craptacular build, components, etc...
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 02:00 PM
  #13  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by Darth Xed
This is probably quite true, but then value of purchase should not be a factor in "worst-made" vehcile lists...

"Worst-made" to me, implies craptacular build, components, etc...
Yup, same goes for fuel economy (I'm sure that is a complaint). You can't have 400HP in a large SUV and expect it to sip fuel like Civic.
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 02:24 PM
  #14  
mdenz3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,173
Think this article is crap? Tell the author: http://www.facebook.com/hannahelliott
Old Apr 12, 2010 | 05:56 PM
  #15  
97QuasarBlue3.8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,018
*****. Talk about airhead reporting.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 AM.