Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Will Altima, Mazda6, et al fear Malibu SS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 26, 2003 | 01:04 AM
  #1  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Will Altima, Mazda6, et al fear Malibu SS?

Will Malibu SS scare the competition? It will have a larger version of the Malibu's 200 horse 3.5...probably a 3.9L. It will have a retuned suspension and bigger wheels. A manual trans is unlikely.

Will it compete?
Old Apr 26, 2003 | 08:27 AM
  #2  
90 Z28SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,801
From: South Bend , IN
Re: Will Altima, Mazda6, et al fear Malibu SS?

Wouldnt the Malibu SS get AWD and 275 hp like the new Grand Am will have avail . ? Sounds logical since the 2 cars are on the same platform .
Old Apr 26, 2003 | 09:24 AM
  #3  
WERM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,873
From: South Jersey
I've never understood how they could call something "super sport" and not offer a manual transmission.

It also needs to be cheaper or faster than regular V6 models from other car companies (For an example of why this is necessary: consider a 240HP Supercharged MonteCarlo SS vs. 260HP Accord Coupe).
Old Apr 26, 2003 | 12:25 PM
  #4  
Chuck!'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,610
From: Cincinnati, OH
Re: Re: Will Altima, Mazda6, et al fear Malibu SS?

Originally posted by 90 Z28SS
Wouldnt the Malibu SS get AWD and 275 hp like the new Grand Am will have avail . ? Sounds logical since the 2 cars are on the same platform .
That'd be pretty damn cool.
Old Apr 26, 2003 | 12:30 PM
  #5  
SNEAKY NEIL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,072
From: Lilburn, GA, USA
Originally posted by WERM
I've never understood how they could call something "super sport" and not offer a manual transmission.

It also needs to be cheaper or faster than regular V6 models from other car companies (For an example of why this is necessary: consider a 240HP Supercharged MonteCarlo SS vs. 260HP Accord Coupe).
Doesn't the accord have 240hp?
Old Apr 26, 2003 | 12:49 PM
  #6  
WERM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,873
From: South Jersey
I stand corrected. It is 240HP, not 260. The 260 is the rating in the Acura. However, my point remains the same - that a "SS" model should be faster than its average competition.
Old Apr 26, 2003 | 12:56 PM
  #7  
MunchE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 599
From: Inland Empire, CA
So let's see, we have the Malibu SS, offering no manual transmission, horsepower in the low-mid range of the competition, bland styling, and modern Chevy interior quality...

Yeah, it'll compete alright.

When is GM going to learn that they have a bad image in the market, and to catch up they truly have to offer a superior value? The Malibu SS is just another example of the sub-par crap they've been pumping out in the last decade, and we wonder why no one buys anything but their trucks.

If it got AWD and 275hp, then it'd actually be a competitive, fast car, that can haul your groceries and have the safety bonus of AWD in bad weather. But something tells me that's just too obvious to actually be done.
Old Apr 26, 2003 | 05:45 PM
  #8  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
A 265 Horsepower Nissan Maxima SE: about $26,000 !

240 Horsepower Honda Accord EX sedans, about $27,000!

The $24,000 Nissan Altima SE that will match 5.0 Mustangs in the 1/4 mile: Priceless!

Seems everyone else can make well equpted family cars that are quick and don't sell for thousands of dollars more just for a decal.
For everything else, there's Chevy's SS's.

The name soon to be pimped out on everything from Daewoo based econocars to Chevy diesel dump trucks.

Last edited by guionM; Apr 26, 2003 at 05:48 PM.
Old Apr 26, 2003 | 06:50 PM
  #9  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Actually the Malibu's Epsilon platform has the goods to make the SS an excellent performer.

But I think AWD will be out of the question for Malibu, 275 hp is probably EXTREMELY optimistic, and the big deal killer for me would be no manual trans.
Old Apr 26, 2003 | 07:04 PM
  #10  
redzed's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,954
[QUOTE]Originally posted by guionM
[B][B]A 265 Horsepower Nissan Maxima SE: about $26,000 !

240 Horsepower Honda Accord EX sedans, about $27,000!

The $24,000 Nissan Altima SE that will match 5.0 Mustangs in the 1/4 mile: Priceless!

Seems everyone else can make well equpted family cars that are quick and don't sell for thousands of dollars more just for a decal.
For everything else, there's Chevy's SS's.

[QUOTE]

You're right about everything, except for the new Maxima. It's gone way upmarket. Expect to drop $30k on the new Maxima SE. It seems as if new Infiniti model are better deals in base form than their loaded Nissan counterparts. If you don't believe me, compare the larger GX35 SUV with the Altima-based Murano.

In any case, Chevrolet sedans seem to have fallen from grace with consumers in recent years. Chevy has dug a pretty deep hole, and the SS-badge isn't enough to get them out. The success they've been having with big truck and SUVs would almost seem to be a case of "being in the right place, at the right time." Corvette aside, does any any non-truck Chevrolet stand half-a-chance against the competion?
Old Apr 26, 2003 | 07:19 PM
  #11  
RiceEating5.0's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,313
Chevy will have to do something about that seriously bland styling. Its got to look the part of a sport sedan like the Altimas, Accord v6 coupe, and Mazada6's. The Malibu doesn't need to look all homely and bland like the current generation (i'm sure it will since i've seen the upcoming Max). It needs to look more sleek and aggressive.

If they get the styling and performance down right, the Malibu will be a capable contender. But that's wishiful thinking in my book. Either the styling, performance, or both will probably be lacking behind the competition.
Old Apr 26, 2003 | 07:39 PM
  #12  
WERM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,873
From: South Jersey
Originally posted by redzed

You're right about everything, except for the new Maxima. It's gone way upmarket. Expect to drop $30k on the new Maxima SE. It seems as if new Infiniti model are better deals in base form than their loaded Nissan counterparts. If you don't believe me, compare the larger GX35 SUV with the Altima-based Murano.


You're right there.... I have no idea what the point of the Maxima is anymore.

In any case, Chevrolet sedans seem to have fallen from grace with consumers in recent years. Chevy has dug a pretty deep hole, and the SS-badge isn't enough to get them out. The success they've been having with big truck and SUVs would almost seem to be a case of "being in the right place, at the right time." Corvette aside, does any any non-truck Chevrolet stand half-a-chance against the competion?


I certainly hope they don't put undersized wheels and tires and give them duller styling to help justify pricey SS models. We all know what happened when they tried this on the Camaro.

But you are right about Corvette - Chevrolet has a problem in that they only have one car that people rally behind and get excited about - but most can't afford it. All of their other excitement generating models have been discontinued or reborn in sanitized FWD form, to the protest and disgust of loyalists everywhere. Everything in the pipeline seems like it will be more exciting to AVIS than performance gurus with less than $35,000 to spend.
Old Apr 26, 2003 | 08:23 PM
  #13  
redzed's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,954
Originally posted by WERM
Originally posted by redzed

You're right about everything, except for the new Maxima. It's gone way upmarket. Expect to drop $30k on the new Maxima SE. It seems as if new Infiniti model are better deals in base form than their loaded Nissan counterparts. If you don't believe me, compare the larger GX35 SUV with the Altima-based Murano.


You're right there.... I have no idea what the point of the Maxima is anymore.

In any case, Chevrolet sedans seem to have fallen from grace with consumers in recent years. Chevy has dug a pretty deep hole, and the SS-badge isn't enough to get them out. The success they've been having with big truck and SUVs would almost seem to be a case of "being in the right place, at the right time." Corvette aside, does any any non-truck Chevrolet stand half-a-chance against the competion?


I certainly hope they don't put undersized wheels and tires and give them duller styling to help justify pricey SS models. We all know what happened when they tried this on the Camaro.

But you are right about Corvette - Chevrolet has a problem in that they only have one car that people rally behind and get excited about - but most can't afford it. All of their other excitement generating models have been discontinued or reborn in sanitized FWD form, to the protest and disgust of loyalists everywhere. Everything in the pipeline seems like it will be more exciting to AVIS than performance gurus with less than $35,000 to spend.
1. Nissan has moved the Maxima upmarket to compete in the Toyota Avalon price class. (It makes me wonder if there will be an new Infinit I35.) In contrast, the Altima is head-on against the Camry/Accord. This all makes sense in marketing terms, because the old 4-cylinder Altima fell beneath the Camry-class, and the Maxima fell uncomfortably above it. However, $28,000-$35,000 Maximas are just plain scary.

2. I don't think the SS package depreciated the Z28, and similarly, an Malibu SS won't make the base car any worse. Of course the big problem with "packaging" vs. "pick-and-choose" options is that it removes consumer choice.

3. The current Chevy carline has become an unappealing mix of downmarket FWD products, but mostly because of changing buying patterns. The Caprice died a slow death while the Tahoe rocketed up in the sales charts. If the future Malibu promises to be dull and underpowered, at least by current standard, it because the current model only found success in a very downmarket niche. It was, after all, "the cheapest V6 sedan on the market." As long as Chevrolet produces direct replacements for all of its depressing throw-away sedans, nothing can change. Making a Malibu SS doesn't seem to change that.
Old Apr 26, 2003 | 08:35 PM
  #14  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by redzed

2. I don't think the SS package depreciated the Z28,
I cannot tell you how much I disagree with this point!

Call the 4th gen Z/28 a sport.......because everything the 4th gen SS was, was on the Z/28's tab.
Old Apr 26, 2003 | 08:59 PM
  #15  
stars1010's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,121
From: Houston
Originally posted by Z284ever
I cannot tell you how much I disagree with this point!

Call the 4th gen Z/28 a sport.......because everything the 4th gen SS was, was on the Z/28's tab.
I agree, all the 4th gen SS was an up graded Z28. It totally made the Z28 look like the down graded version. Even though the 4th gen is my favorite when it comes to styling and performance the line up was all wrong.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 PM.