V8 Silverado makes CNN.com 13 Great fuel-efficent list...
V8 Silverado makes CNN.com 13 Great fuel-efficent list...
http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/..._savers/5.html
Full-size pick-up
Chevrolet Silverado
Fuel economy: 15 mpg City / 20 highway
Twenty miles per gallon on the highway might not seem like a bid deal. but we're talking about a big truck here. Consider that the Silverado's fuel economy is identical to that of the car-based V6-powered Honda Ridgeline.
The Silverado, and its GMC Sierra twin, also have easy-to-drive ride and handling qualities that are unmatched by any other full-sized truck.
Chevrolet Silverado
Fuel economy: 15 mpg City / 20 highway
Twenty miles per gallon on the highway might not seem like a bid deal. but we're talking about a big truck here. Consider that the Silverado's fuel economy is identical to that of the car-based V6-powered Honda Ridgeline.
The Silverado, and its GMC Sierra twin, also have easy-to-drive ride and handling qualities that are unmatched by any other full-sized truck.
But the article already used the V6 ridgeline as an example. Thus the comparison that GM's V8 was more as fuel efficient as competing V6s was already made. I wanted to add to that point what the article didn't - their V8 is as fuel efficient as their own V6.
I've long since been a proponent for not automatically dismissing the 'larger' motor choice simply due to fuel economy concerns. My wife's 4runner for example would have only suffered by half a mpg going from the 4.0L V6 to the 4.7L V8. She was assuming it would be much worse.
And while we're on the topic - the Tundra's 380hp V8 gets 16/20 in 2WD flavor.
That's more power, plus slightly better economy than the subject of this article.
Oh, and 1 mpg lower than the Chevy V6.
What's my point?
That articles like this that simply present "engine X > engine Y" in a very limited and selective perspective are pretty misleading...
That's more power, plus slightly better economy than the subject of this article.

Oh, and 1 mpg lower than the Chevy V6.
What's my point?
That articles like this that simply present "engine X > engine Y" in a very limited and selective perspective are pretty misleading...
And while we're on the topic - the Tundra's 380hp V8 gets 16/20 in 2WD flavor.
That's more power, plus slightly better economy than the subject of this article.
Oh, and 1 mpg lower than the Chevy V6.
What's my point?
That articles like this that simply present "engine X > engine Y" in a very limited and selective perspective are pretty misleading...
That's more power, plus slightly better economy than the subject of this article.

Oh, and 1 mpg lower than the Chevy V6.
What's my point?
That articles like this that simply present "engine X > engine Y" in a very limited and selective perspective are pretty misleading...
And while we're on the topic - the Tundra's 380hp V8 gets 16/20 in 2WD flavor.
That's more power, plus slightly better economy than the subject of this article.
Oh, and 1 mpg lower than the Chevy V6.
What's my point?
That articles like this that simply present "engine X > engine Y" in a very limited and selective perspective are pretty misleading...
That's more power, plus slightly better economy than the subject of this article.

Oh, and 1 mpg lower than the Chevy V6.
What's my point?
That articles like this that simply present "engine X > engine Y" in a very limited and selective perspective are pretty misleading...
2wd vs. 2wd the Silverado still gets better mileage http://fueleconomy.gov/feg/findacar.htm
FWIW, my '07 Tahoe is rated at 15/21mpg, and with 25,000 miles on it, it has gotten a consistant 15.5mpg in real world driving (roughly a 50/50 split of hwy/city) On a level hwy, it will average 20mpg at 65mph, but start going up and down hills and it falls pretty quickly.


