Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Trailblazer SS review.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 07:48 PM
  #61  
greg_nate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 318
Re: Trailblazer SS review.

Originally Posted by 96_Camaro_B4C
0-60 in 6.3 seconds? I'm guessing the more mainstream magazines will be getting 0-60 times in the 5.4-5.8 range.

Car and Driver got a 5.5 out of an LS2 SSR, albeit with a six speed manual. 1/4 mile was 14.1 @ 100 mph. The SSR curb weight was 4746 lbs in that test; Chevy lists it as 470x lbs. The Chevy website lists 4417 and 4594 for 2wd and 4wd Trailblazers (I'd imagine the SS 20" wheels will add a little to that). So the TB is slightly lighter than the SSR, especially in 2wd trim. 6.3/14.4 seems a little slow.
Yes, that time does seem slow. The Jeep SRT8 supposedly gets to 60 in under 5 seconds. The SRT8 has a 415 hp engine, while the TB SS has a 390 HP engine. However, the SRT8 is almost 300 lbs. heavier than the SS...so the power-to-weight ratio makes these two almost dead even. Therefore, how do they get 6.3 seconds in one car, and under 5 in the other?

Something isn't right.
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 08:00 PM
  #62  
greg_nate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 318
Re: Trailblazer SS review.

Originally Posted by UtOhCop
Why do you keep saying that? The SRT8 puts out a good 30 more horsepower then the LS2 SS.
Actually, it puts out 25 more horsepower. But the SRT8 is also more than three hundred pounds heavier. That puts the two dead even in performance.

The rule of thumb is that 10 pounds shed is equivalent to 1 horsepower gained. 300+ pounds is equivalent to a 30+ horsepower gain for the Trailblazer.

That's why mustangs with a 40 hp advantage get stomped by Corvettes.

The Trailblazer and the Jeep oughtta be a good match up.
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 06:12 PM
  #63  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Re: Trailblazer SS review.

Originally Posted by greg_nate
Yes, that time does seem slow. The Jeep SRT8 supposedly gets to 60 in under 5 seconds. The SRT8 has a 415 hp engine, while the TB SS has a 390 HP engine. However, the SRT8 is almost 300 lbs. heavier than the SS...so the power-to-weight ratio makes these two almost dead even. Therefore, how do they get 6.3 seconds in one car, and under 5 in the other?

Something isn't right.
If the 420 horses (latest figure) in the GC are as healthy as the 425 horses in the Magnum/Charger/300, then I'd expect it to be quicker than the TB SS. Does anyone know which transmission they're using in the GC SRT8? If it's the Mercedes-designed one, then I would expect low times relative to hp/weight.

Regarding Edmunds acceleration times, I believe they do not correct for weather conditions, and that the track they often use (in Fontana I think) is a little slow. Remember that standard weather corrections almost always result in a faster time, since testing is usually done in conditions worse than 59 degrees at sea level. Fontana will be warmer than 59 degree except in winter or late night/early morning. And it's a few hundred feet above sea level.
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 12:22 AM
  #64  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Trailblazer SS review.

Anyone know why you still can't price a TB SS on Chevy's website?
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 07:17 AM
  #65  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Re: Trailblazer SS review.

Originally Posted by Z284ever
Anyone know why you still can't price a TB SS on Chevy's website?

I've been wondering the same thing.

I was there a few weeks ago, after being missing for quite some time after the 06 site launched.

I don't understand why they removed it, unless it was by accident or something. Maybe they had server issues, a nd restored to a backup which was before they added the info, and don't realize it's missing, or something like that.
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 09:20 AM
  #66  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Trailblazer SS review.

Yeah, you can't even search for one on GM Buypower or build one on Edmunds.
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 09:36 AM
  #67  
1990 Turbo Grand Prix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 764
From: Crystal Falls, MI USA
Re: Trailblazer SS review.

Originally Posted by Z284ever
Anyone know why you still can't price a TB SS on Chevy's website?
Hmmm....

They're already on the ground too...

Interesting.
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 09:43 AM
  #68  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Trailblazer SS review.

Originally Posted by 1990 Turbo Grand Prix
Hmmm....

They're already on the ground too...

Interesting.
Yeah, interesting.

Wonder what's up.
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 11:10 AM
  #69  
Hoodshaker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 284
From: Van Nuys, Ca.
Re: Trailblazer SS review.

Originally Posted by Z284ever
Yeah, you can't even search for one on GM Buypower or build one on Edmunds.
You can build it on Edmunds. The SS option is a package (B4U) That is available on any of the 4 styles. So pick a style and then select the (B4U) SS package on the option page.
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 12:11 PM
  #70  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Re: Trailblazer SS review.

Originally Posted by Hoodshaker
You can build it on Edmunds. The SS option is a package (B4U) That is available on any of the 4 styles. So pick a style and then select the (B4U) SS package on the option page.
The RPO code for the SS always put a grin on my face!!

You know whoever selected that code was doing it with the subliminal message "Before You!" as in "I won the race!"
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 12:28 PM
  #71  
RussStang's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,011
From: Exton, Pennsylvania
Re: Trailblazer SS review.

Originally Posted by Darth Xed
The RPO code for the SS always put a grin on my face!!

You know whoever selected that code was doing it with the subliminal message "Before You!" as in "I won the race!"
Heh, I never thought about that.
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 12:38 PM
  #72  
Hoodshaker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 284
From: Van Nuys, Ca.
Re: Trailblazer SS review.

Originally Posted by Darth Xed
The RPO code for the SS always put a grin on my face!!

You know whoever selected that code was doing it with the subliminal message "Before You!" as in "I won the race!"
You know, its funny I always liked that RPO too but never thought about why. Nice catch.
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 01:29 PM
  #73  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Re: Trailblazer SS review.

FWIW, Chevy.com will let you select the SS package right now... but I can only see it on the higher level LS option group (1SB) right now...
Old Dec 10, 2005 | 09:39 AM
  #74  
GTPprix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 26
From: Macomb Township, MI
Re: Trailblazer SS review.

For real world stuff you guys might find what I'm working on right now interesting

http://forums.trailvoy.com/showthread.php?t=3049
Old Dec 10, 2005 | 08:41 PM
  #75  
Gold_Rush's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,870
Re: Trailblazer SS review.

Originally Posted by greg_nate
Actually, it puts out 25 more horsepower. But the SRT8 is also more than three hundred pounds heavier. That puts the two dead even in performance.

The rule of thumb is that 10 pounds shed is equivalent to 1 horsepower gained. 300+ pounds is equivalent to a 30+ horsepower gain for the Trailblazer.

That's why mustangs with a 40 hp advantage get stomped by Corvettes.

The Trailblazer and the Jeep oughtta be a good match up.
I don't know if things are that simple. You've still got other factors like gearing, etc...

And FYI: 03/04 Cobra's where not getting stomped by Ls1 c5's...atleast not in straightline acceleration and 1/4 mile.

But i do agree that that the TB SS and SRTGC should be a good matchup. I think the Jeep will be slightly faster, but the two should be close.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11 AM.