Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Thier are rumors the Solstice may get a new name when it goes into production.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 8, 2003 | 04:36 PM
  #16  
stars1010's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,121
From: Houston
Originally posted by Chris 96 WS6
Honestly I think it would be a mistake for it not to be called Solstice. Its a fresh but catchy name and the car already has quite a bit of buzz associated with it. Changing names would throw a lot of people off and the Firebird and Sunfire names have a lot of connotations associated with them that the Solstice probably doesn't need or that would not fit it.

No better way to ruin a fresh, new product than putting an old name on it.
My thoughts exactly. Who ever thought about putting the Firebird name on the Solstice needs to stay the hell away from the Camaro.
Old Jan 8, 2003 | 04:55 PM
  #17  
cmc's Avatar
cmc
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 681
From: Houston, TX USA
The '90 or '91 Fiero concept (the really sleek NSX-looking model) was at an auto show (or some other event on display) at one point with a "Trans Am GTA" badge on it...

Hmmmmm...
Old Jan 8, 2003 | 05:19 PM
  #18  
Doug Harden's Avatar
Prominent Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,282
Lightbulb Knowing that........

.........we are still a few years away from public discussion concerning the return of the Camaro..........and I would assume the gag order included the Firebird.......I doubt this will happen.......

Now I know some will point out that a "Solstice - Firebird" would be a major departure for the Firebird....the 5th gen Camaro ain't gonna' be on a "f-body" platform either....
Old Jan 8, 2003 | 08:21 PM
  #19  
SNEAKY NEIL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,072
From: Lilburn, GA, USA
I do wonder if that gag order applies to the Firebird, one would think so. Put me down for another person against naming that car "Firebird". Even though the new Camaro will not be based on the F platform, it should, and I think will, stay true to it's form and that is far more important than what platform it is on.
Old Jan 8, 2003 | 09:45 PM
  #20  
gtjeff's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 388
From: Racine, WI
Originally posted by cmc
The '90 or '91 Fiero concept (the really sleek NSX-looking model) was at an auto show (or some other event on display) at one point with a "Trans Am GTA" badge on it...

Hmmmmm...
This car was shown in Louisville KY a few months ago for the first time ever in public. Car even has a 4th generation fbody dash.!! No one knows what the current engine is? Pontiac was rumored to want to continue the trans am name plate. I see something like this more likely as a firebird or ta. To use the firebird name on solstice would be laughable, they have nothing in common.
Old Jan 9, 2003 | 01:55 AM
  #21  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally posted by Chris 96 WS6
This would be acceptable to me ONLY if Trans AM remained dead forever, or came back later as a limited edition variant of the Camaro. Tiny 2 seat, v6 roadster is not a Trans Am. Divorcing Firebird and Trans Am would be just as big of a jump as divorcing Camaro and Firebird, though.
I agree with you, I don't care if they call this car Firebird as long as there is NO Trans Am version. Trans Am needs to be a bad as V8 RWD 2+2. Maybe a Vette based T/A could see, but Id rather have a 2+2
Old Jan 9, 2003 | 10:19 AM
  #22  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Not to ruffle anyone's feathers, but....to me, Trans Ams, stopped being Trans Ams after 1981.
Old Jan 9, 2003 | 10:34 AM
  #23  
Sixer-Bird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,215
From: Coppell, Texas
I think Solstice is a very fitting name for this car. Firebird or Sunfire just doesn't sound right for it. Banshee could work though...
Old Jan 9, 2003 | 05:19 PM
  #24  
centric's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,022
From: Newhall, CA USA
Sunfire = connotations of 80's POS crapboxes.
Firebird = connotations of gold chains and chest hair.

Keep the Solstice name, GM.
Old Jan 9, 2003 | 05:42 PM
  #25  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally posted by centric
Sunfire = connotations of 80's POS crapboxes.
Firebird = connotations of gold chains and chest hair.

Keep the Solstice name, GM.
Firebird was 10 years old when it was earning that connotation. Over 20 years has past since then, & it's done pretty well. Think that view may be a little harsh & biased?
Old Jan 9, 2003 | 09:55 PM
  #26  
jrp4uc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,724
From: Hebron, KY
Originally posted by centric
Sunfire = connotations of 80's POS crapboxes.
lol...they only started calling it Sunfire in 1995! It's styling isn't that dated!

Of course it was Sunbird perviously, and I had one that was very reliable. It was a '90 and still going with nearly 150k miles when I sold it off...never had any trouble out of it and it went through a lot.
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 09:29 AM
  #27  
1990 Turbo Grand Prix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 764
From: Crystal Falls, MI USA
Why not?

As being the proud owner of a 2002 T/A Ram Air, I personally don't mind the useage of Firebird on the Solstice. This could breath new life into an aged name. As it goes for history, the Firebird name only refered to the V6 F-body in it's later years. Then when it becomes time for a new Camaro, call that the Trans Am to fill in the real bad boy void left buy the 2002. So then there would be a sports car for all types of enthusiast, a 4cyl Firebird sports coupe, a muscular Trans Am muscle car, and a larger V8 gran touring muscle GTO.
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 09:40 AM
  #28  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
I really think using the T/A name on a Camaro would cause all kind of confusion.
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 09:45 AM
  #29  
1990 Turbo Grand Prix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 764
From: Crystal Falls, MI USA
I see how you could get that! I didn't mean T/A on the Camaro, I meant a Pontiac version of the Camaro, but only called the Trans Am and not Firebird Trans Am as it was. Two completely different Pontiacs instead of one with different appearance and power packages.
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 09:52 AM
  #30  
Z28Marcus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 528
From: The land of ice and snow.
What on earth would be the point of calling it a firebird?

I mean the firebird conjures up an image of big engined muscle - not generally regarded by the general masses as a nimble little car (though us hardcore afficianados know that in reality they still handle just great).

The solstice is a different design mentality altogether - smaller, 2 seater with something like miata like handling and looks to match.

So why would any sane marketing person even consider confusing the general populace of consumers by renaming the Solstice as Firebird?

And yes I agree, the Firebird should come back modernized - but ultimately true to it's brawny, v8 roots or not all, just like the Camaro. Anything else would be heresy.

Pontiac - are you getting the message??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 PM.